UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.     )

Filed by the Registrant   Filed by a Party other than the Registrant

Check the appropriate box:

 

☐ 

Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

☐ 

Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

☒ 

Definitive Proxy Statement

 

☐ 

Definitive Additional Materials

 

☐ 

Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Applied Materials, Inc.

 

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

  

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

☒ 

No fee required.

 

☐ 

Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 (1) 

Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

 (2) 

Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

 

  

 

 (3) 

Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

  

 

 (4) 

Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

 

  

 

 (5) 

Total fee paid:

 

  

 

 

☐ 

Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:

 

☐ 

Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1) 

Amount Previously Paid:

 

  

 

 (2) 

Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

  

 

 (3) 

Filing Party:

 

  

 

 (4) 

Date Filed:

 

  

 

 


LOGO

2020 NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING AND PROXY STATEMENTLOGO


   

 

LOGOLOGO

January 30, 202026, 2022

Dear Fellow Shareholders:

On behalf of the Board of Directors, we are pleased to invite you to attend Applied Materials’ 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, which will be held on Thursday, March 12, 2020,10, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific TimeTime. This year’s Annual Meeting will be conducted virtually due to the public health concerns resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our shareholders, employees, and community. The Annual Meeting will be held online at our corporate officeswww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022 and will provide shareholders with the opportunity to participate and submit questions as they would at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054.an in-person meeting.

We encourage you to read this Proxy Statement because it contains important information for voting your shares and sets forth how the Board oversaw your investment over the past year. This year’s Proxy Statement reflects our continued focus on our business strategy, an engaged and effective Board, sound corporate governance and executive compensation practices, our sustainabilityEnvironmental, Social, and corporate social responsibilityGovernance strategy, and our regular dialogue with and responsiveness to our shareholders.

Financial Performance and Business Strategy

In fiscal 2019,2021, Applied Materials delivered solid resultsthe best financial performance in a challenging market environment that was shaped by down cyclescompany history while navigating ongoing challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic. Our revenues increased 34% and earnings per share increased 63% year-over-year and we generated record annual cash flows from operations. We also continued to make substantial progress towards our 10-year roadmap for environmental and social responsibility.

As we look ahead, we remain very positive about our long-term growth opportunities. The digital transformation of the global economy accelerated in both semiconductor and display equipment spending. Our broad portfolio of products and technologies has helped make Applied afiscal 2021, making semiconductors more resilient company that can perform wellstrategically important to the world than at any other time in a variety of conditions. We are carefully managing our spending while increasing our R&D investments in new capabilities and products that put us in a great position for the future.

We maintain a positive long-term view of our markets as major new growth drivers emerge in the form of thehistory. The Internet of Things (IoT), big data, and artificial intelligence (AI). As are fueling increased demand for semiconductors and driving the need for next-generation silicon technologies. At the same time, the industry transitionsis increasingly adopting a new playbook for driving improvements in chip power, performance, area, cost, and time-to-market (PPACt). With our broad portfolio of highly enabling solutions, Applied Materials is strongly positioned to this new era of computing, there is a tremendous need for innovation in semiconductors and displays, and we believe this creates exciting opportunities for Applied. We remain focused on working closely withdeliver innovations that accelerate our customers to accelerate theircustomers’ PPACt roadmaps and bring technology breakthroughs to market.create significant value for our shareholders.

Shareholder Engagement and Demonstrated Responsiveness

We are committed to effective corporate governance that is informed by our shareholders, promotes the long-term interests of our company and its shareholders, and strengthens the Board’s and management’s accountability.

We have a robust shareholder outreach program that focuses on governance, compensation, environmental and sustainability issues of interest to our shareholders. Theshareholders, particularly in the areas of governance, compensation, environmental sustainability, and human capital matters such as diversity and inclusion. Our shareholder outreach program is a recurring, year-round effort, led by a cross-functional team that includes members of our Investor Relations, Global Rewards, Diversity and Inclusion, Environmental Health and SafetyESG, and Legal functions, with participation of independent directors where appropriate. Shareholder feedback continues to directly informsinform the Board’s decision-making on a variety of important matters.

In response to the high level of shareholder support at last year’s annual meeting for a proposal for shareholder action by written consent, management and directors engaged in an extensive shareholder outreach to hear directly from our shareholders on their views on the topic. Feedback received was shared and discussed with the full Board. In response to the shareholder feedback and after careful consideration, the Board is submitting for shareholder approval an amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to allow shareholder action by written consent.

Thank you for your continued investment in and support of Applied Materials.

Sincerely,

 

LOGO

 

Thomas J. Iannotti

Chairman of the Board

  

LOGO

 

 

Gary E. Dickerson

President and Chief Executive Officer

  

 

3050 Bowers Avenue

Santa Clara, California 95054

Phone:(408) 727-5555

  

Mailing Address:

Applied Materials, Inc.

3050 Bowers Avenue

P.O. Box 58039

Santa Clara, California 95052-803995054-3299


LOGOLOGO

NOTICE OF

20202022 ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

Thursday, March 12, 202010, 2022

at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time

The 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Applied Materials, Inc. will be held on Thursday, March 12, 2020,10, 2022, at 11:00 a.m. Pacific TimeTime. Due to the public health concerns resulting from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic and to support the health and well-being of our shareholders, employees, and community, the Annual Meeting will be a virtual meeting held online at our corporate officeswww.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022 via a live webcast. Shareholders of record at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054.the close of business on January 12, 2022 and holders of proxies for those shareholders may attend and vote at the Annual Meeting. You will be able to vote and submit questions online through the virtual meeting platform during the Annual Meeting. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Please see “Virtual Annual Meeting” on page iv for additional information.

Items of Business

 

1.To elect ten directors to serve for aone-year term and until their successors have been duly elected and qualified.

2.  To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2019.2021.

3.  To ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020.2022.

4.  To approve an amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to allow shareholders to act by written consent.consider two shareholder proposals, if properly presented at the Annual Meeting.

5.To transact any other business that may properly come before the Annual Meeting or any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting.

Your vote is important to us. You may vote via the Internet or by telephone, or if you requested to receive printed proxy materials, by signing, dating, and returning your proxy card. If you are voting via the Internet or by telephone, your vote must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on Wednesday, March 11, 2020.9, 2022. For specific voting instructions, please refer to the information provided in the following Proxy Statement, together with your proxy card or the voting instructions you receive bye-mail or that are provided via the Internet.

If you received a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials on how to access the proxy materials via the Internet, a proxy card was not sent to you, and you may vote only via the Internet, unless you have requested a paper copy of the proxy materials, in which case, you may also vote by telephone or by signing, dating, and returning your proxy card. Shares cannot be voted by marking, writing on, and returning the Notice of Internet Availability. Any Notices of Internet Availability that are returned will not be counted as votes. Instructions for requesting a paper copy of the proxy materials are set forth on the Notice of Internet Availability.

 

By Order of the Board of Directors

LOGO

Christina Y. LaiTeri A. Little

Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and
Corporate Secretary

Santa Clara, California

January 30, 202026, 2022

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Shareholder Meeting to be held on March 12, 2020:10, 2022: The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available atwww.proxyvote.com. www.proxyvote.com.


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

   Page
20202022 Proxy Statement Summary   i 

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

   i 

Proposals and Board Recommendations

   i 

Director Nominees

   ii 

Board Practices and Composition

   iii 

Corporate Governance

   iv 

Virtual Annual Meeting

iv

Executive Compensation

   v 

Sustainability and Corporate Social ResponsibilityOur Commitment to ESG

   xixii 
Proposal 1—Election of Directors   1 

Nominees

   1 
Board and Corporate Governance Practices   7 

Board Composition and Nominee Considerations

   7 

Nominee Skills and Experience

   7 

Board Composition and Refreshment

   89 

Corporate Governance

   911 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

   911 

Board Leadership

   1011 

Director Onboarding and Education

   1011 

Board and Committee Evaluations

   1011 

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

   1112 

Management Succession Planning

   1213 

Shareholder Rights

   1213 

Shareholder Engagement

   1314 

Shareholder Communications

   1415 

Stock Ownership Guidelines

   1415 

Standards of Business Conduct

   1415 

Board Meetings and Committees

   1415 
Director Compensation   1617 

Compensation Program for Directors

   1617 

Director Compensation for Fiscal 20192021

   1718 
Stock Ownership Information   1819 

Principal Shareholders

   1819 

Directors and Executive Officers

   1920 
Proposal 2—Approval, on an Advisory Basis, of the Compensation of Our Named Executive Officers   2021 
Compensation Discussion and Analysis   2122 

Executive Summary

   2122 

Compensation Governance and Decision-Making Framework

   2830 

Components of Total Direct Compensation

   2931 

Additional Compensation Programs and Policies

   3843 
   Page
Human Resources and
Compensation Committee Report
   4044 
Executive Compensation   4145 

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019

   4145 

Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 20192021

   4246 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 20192021 Year-End

   4347 

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 20192021

   4448 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

   4448 

Employment Agreement

   4549 

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

   4649 

CEO Pay Ratio

   4651 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

   4751 
Proposal 3—Ratification of the Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm   4853 

Fees Paid to KPMG LLP

   4853 

Policy on Audit Committee’sPre-Approval of Audit and PermissibleNon-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

   4954 

Audit Committee Report

   4954 
Proposal 4—Approval of an Amendment and Restatement of Our Certificate of Incorporation to Allow Shareholders to Act by Written ConsentShareholder Proposal Regarding Special Shareholder Meeting   5055 

BackgroundShareholder Proposal

   5055 

Shareholder EngagementBoard of Directors Statement in Opposition

   5056 
Proposal 5—Shareholder Proposal Regarding Executive Compensation Program and Policy58

Shareholder FeedbackProposal

   5058 

Board’s Decision and RationaleBoard of Directors Statement in Opposition

   51

Shareholder Approval Required

5258 
Questions and Answers About the Proxy Statement and Our 20202022 Annual Meeting   5360 
Other Matters   5865 

Shareholder Proposals or Nominations for 20212023 Annual Meeting

   5865 

No Incorporation by Reference

   5865 
Appendix A: Unaudited Reconciliation ofNon-GAAP Adjusted Financial Measures   A-1 
Appendix B: Proposed Amended and Restated Certificate of IncorporationB-1

Reconciliation ofnon-GAAP adjusted financial measures used in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement, other than as part of disclosure of target levels, can be found in Appendix A.

 

 

Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Proxy Statement contains forward-looking statements, including those regarding anticipated growth and trends in our businesses and markets, industry outlooks, market share, technology transitions, our business, strategies and financial performance, our development of new products, technologies and capabilities, and other statements that are not historical fact, and actual results could differ materially. Risk factors that could cause actual results to differ are set forth in the “Risk Factors” section of, and elsewhere in, our 20192021 Annual Report on Form10-K and other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. All forward-looking statements are based on management’s estimates, projections, and assumptions as of the date hereof, and Applied Materials undertakes no obligation to update any such statements.


20202022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

20202022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Your proxy is being solicited on behalf of the Board of Directors of Applied Materials, Inc. We are making this Proxy Statement available to shareholders beginning on January 30, 2020.26, 2022. This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this Proxy Statement. We encourage you to read the entire Proxy Statement for more information prior to voting.

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

 

 

Date and Time:  March 12, 2020,10, 2022, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time
Location:  Applied Materials, Inc., 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054The Annual Meeting will be held online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022 via a live webcast. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person. Please see “Virtual Annual Meeting” on the page iv for additional information.
Record Date:  January 16, 202012, 2022
Voting:  Shareholders as of the record date are entitled to vote. Each share of common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on.
Attendance:  Shareholders and their duly appointed proxies may attend the meeting.

Proposals and Board Recommendations

 

 

    For More Information Board Recommendation
Proposal 1 – Election of Directors  Pages 1 to 6  FOR each Nominee

Judy BrunerRani Borkar

 

Stephen R. ForrestGary E. Dickerson

 

Yvonne McGill

   

Xun (Eric) ChenJudy Bruner

 

Thomas J. Iannotti

 

Scott A. McGregor

   

Xun (Eric) Chen

Aart J. de Geus

Gary E. Dickerson

 

Alexander A. Karsner

Adrianna C. Ma

    
   
Proposal 2 – Executive Compensation  Page 2021  FOR

Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 20192021

   
   
Proposal 3 – Ratification of Registered Accounting Firm  Page 4853 FOR

Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 20202022

   
   
Proposal 4 – Amend and Restate our Certificate of Incorporation to Allow Shareholders to Act by Written ConsentShareholder Proposal Regarding Special Shareholder Meeting  Pages 5055 to 5257 ×FOR AGAINST

ApprovalShareholder proposal requesting that the Board take steps to give the owners of an amendment and restatement10% of our Certificate of Incorporationoutstanding common stock the power to allow shareholderscall a special shareholder meeting

Proposal 5 – Shareholder Proposal Regarding Executive Compensation Program and PolicyPages 58 to act by written consent59× AGAINST

Shareholder proposal to improve the executive compensation program and policy, such as to include CEO pay ratio and voices from employees

     


 

Applied Materials, Inc.    i

Applied Materials, Inc.    i


Director Nominees

 

 

Name and Occupation

 

Age

 

Director Since

 

Independent

 

Committees

 

Age

 

 

Director Since

 

 

Independent

 

 

Committees

Rani Borkar

 

 

60

 

 

2020

 

 

 

 

Strategy and Investment

Corporate Vice President, Azure Hardware Systems and
Infrastructure, Microsoft Corporation

    

Judy Bruner

 

 

61

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

Governance (Chair)

 

 

63

 

 

2016

 

 

 

 

Audit (Chair)

Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief
Financial Officer, SanDisk Corporation (retired)

    

Audit

 

    

Governance (Chair)

 

Xun (Eric) Chen

 

 

50

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 

52

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

Compensation

Managing Partner, SB Investment Advisers (US), Inc.

    

Strategy

 

    

Strategy and Investment

 

Aart J. de Geus

 

 

65

 

 

2007

 

 

 

 

Strategy (Chair)

 

 

67

 

 

2007

 

 

 

 

Strategy and Investment

Chairman of the Board of Directors,Co-Chief Executive
Officer, Synopsys, Inc.

    

Investment

 

    

Gary E. Dickerson

 

 

62

 

 

2013

     

 

64

 

 

2013

    

President and Chief Executive Officer, Applied Materials, Inc.

        

Stephen R. Forrest

 

 

69

 

 

2008

 

 

 

 

Audit

Professor of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science,
Physics, and Materials Science & Engineering, University of Michigan

    

Strategy

Investment

 

Thomas J. Iannotti

 

 

63

 

 

2005

 

 

 

 

Compensation (Chair)

 

 

65

 

 

2005

 

 

 

 

Compensation (Chair)

Senior Vice President and General Manager, Enterprise
Services, Hewlett-Packard Company (retired)

        

Alexander A. Karsner

 

 

52

 

 

2008

 

 

 

 

Compensation

 

 

54

 

 

2008

 

 

 

 

Compensation

Senior Strategist, X

    

Governance

 

Senior Strategist, X (parent company: Alphabet Inc.)

    

Governance

 

Adrianna C. Ma

 

 

46

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

Investment (Chair)

 

 

48

 

 

2015

 

 

 

 

Audit

Managing Partner, Haleakala Holdings LLC

    

Audit

Governance

 

Operating Partner, Index Ventures

    

Strategy and Investment

 

Yvonne McGill

 

 

52

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

Audit

 

 

54

 

 

2019

 

 

 

 

Audit

Chief Financial Officer, Senior Vice President, Infrastructure Solutions Group and Global Financial Planning and Analysis, Dell Technologies

    

Corporate Controller and Infrastructure Solutions Group
Chief Financial Officer, Dell Technologies

    

Governance

Scott A. McGregor

 

 

63

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

Audit

 

 

65

 

 

2018

 

 

 

 

Strategy and Investment

President and Chief Executive Officer, Broadcom Corporation (retired)

       

Strategy

 

       

    (Chair)

Audit



 

ii     2020 Proxy Statement

ii    2022 Proxy Statement


20202022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

Board Practices and Composition

 

Ensuring the Board is composed of directors who possess a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders is a top priority of the Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Our Board composition reflects strong Board practices that support regular refreshment based on our board needs, evolving strategy, and proactive succession planning.

 

Director Nominee Expertise Key Attributes

LOGO

LOGOIndustry and Technology Executive Leadership Growth and Emerging Technologies Global Business Financial and Accounting Service, Operations and Manufacturing Strategy and Innovation Cybersecurity Risk Management Government Policy and Sustainability 1 8 2 10 3 4 10 7 10 10

 

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Semiconductor Industry & Technology Financial and Accounting Global Business Strategy and Innovation Operations and Infrastructure Government Policy M&A and Organizational Growth Risk Management Public Company Board Experience Executive Leadership Independence 9 of 10 director nomineesdirectors are independent Diversity 40%50% of director nominees arethe Board is ethnically and/or gender diverse 40% are female 30% are female 20% are ethnically diversediverse1 Tenure 2 directors added to the Board over last 23 years Regular refreshment resulting in average director tenure of less than 8 years > 10 years tenure 4-10 years tenure 0-4< 4 years tenure3 directors 4 directors 3 directors 3 directors1 - Ethnically diverse means a director who self-identifies as one or more of the following (defined by Nasdaq as an Underrepresented Minority): Black or African American, Hispanic or Latinx, Asian, Native American or Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

Board Practices Support Thoughtful Board Composition

 

 

Board Composition to Support Company Strategy

The Board and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee regularly evaluate the size and composition of the Board to ensure appropriate alignment with the Company’s evolving business and strategic needs.

 

 

Policy on Board Diversity

The Board is committed to having a Board that reflects diverse perspectives, including those based on gender, ethnicity, skills, experience at policy-making levels in areas that are relevant to the Company’s global activities, and functional, geographic, or cultural background. The Board has adopted a Policy on Board Diversity as part of its Corporate Governance Guidelines, which highlights its commitment to actively seek out women and ethnically diverse director candidates.

 

 

Annual Board Evaluations

The Board conducts an annual self-assessment of the Board, Board Committees, and individual directors to evaluate effectiveness.

 

 

Board Refreshment

The Board believes the fresh perspectives brought by new directors are critical to a forward-looking and strategic Board when appropriately balanced by the deep understanding of Applied’s business provided by longer-serving directors.

 

 

Director Succession Planning

The Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee reviews the short-short-term and long-term strategies and interests of Applied to determine what current and future skills and experience are required of the Board in exercising its oversight function.

 



 

Applied Materials, Inc.    iii

Applied Materials, Inc.    iii


Corporate Governance

 

We are committed to effective corporate governance that is informed by our shareholders, promotes the long-term interests of our shareholders, and strengthens Board and management accountability.

Governance Highlights

 

 Annual Election of Directors

 Shareholder Right to Act by Written Consent

 Independent Chair of the Board

  

 Shareholder Proxy Access

 Independent Chairman of the Board

 No Poison Pill

 Highly Independent Board (9 of 10 Director nominees) and Committees

  

 No Supermajority Vote RequirementsPoison Pill

 Annual Board, Committee, and Individual Evaluations

 No Supermajority Vote Requirements

 Robust Board Succession Planning

  

 Majority Voting for Directors

RobustPolicy on Board Succession PlanningDiversity

  

 Regular Executive Sessions of Independent Directors

 Active Shareholder Engagement Practices

  

 Stock Ownership Guidelines for Directors and Executives

 Shareholder Right to Call a Special Meeting

  

 Clawback Policy for Annual and Long-Term Incentive Plans

Shareholder Engagement

We believe that strong corporate governance should include regular engagement with our shareholders to enable us to understand and respond to shareholder concerns. We have a robust shareholder outreach program led by a cross-functional team that includes members of our Investor Relations, Global Rewards, Diversity and Inclusion, Environmental Health and SafetyESG, and Legal functions. Independent members of our Board are also involved, as appropriate. In the fall, we solicit feedback on our executive compensation program, corporate governance practices, and sustainability and inclusiondiversity and diversityinclusion initiatives, as well as any matters voted on at our prior annual meeting. After the filing of our proxy statement, we engage again with our shareholders about important topics to be addressed at our annual meeting. Following our annual meeting, we review the results of the meeting and investor feedback, as well as evaluate emerging trends in corporate governance and other areas. We share feedback we receive from our shareholders with the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, and the full Board. Shareholder input is then factored into the Board’s decision-making. See Shareholder Engagement“Shareholder Engagement” on page 1314 for more information.

Virtual Annual Meeting

In responseThis year’s Annual Meeting will be held in a virtual format through a live webcast. You are entitled to participate in the Annual Meeting if you were a shareholder as of the close of business on January 12, 2022, the record date, or hold a valid proxy for the meeting. To be admitted to the high levelAnnual Meeting at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022, you must enter the 16-digit control number found on your Notice of Internet Availability, proxy card, or the voting instructions you receive by e-mail. Beneficial shareholders who did not receive a 16-digit control number from their bank or brokerage firm and who wish to attend the meeting should follow the instructions from their bank or brokerage firm, including any requirement to obtain a legal proxy. Most brokerage firms or banks allow a shareholder to obtain a legal proxy either online or by mail. The meeting webcast will begin promptly at 11:00 a.m., Pacific Time, on March 10, 2022. We encourage you to access the webcast prior to the scheduled start time of the Annual Meeting. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual Annual Meeting, please call the technical support at last year’s annualnumber that will be posted on the virtual shareholder meeting forlog in page. For information on how to vote your shares, please see “Questions and Answers about the proposal on shareholder action by written consent, this year, we also engaged in extensive shareholder outreach to hear directly fromProxy Statement and our shareholders on their views on shareholder action by written consent, as well as our existing special meeting process. Some of our independent directors participated in the outreach with several of our shareholders. Feedback received from the shareholders was shared and discussed with the Board. See “Shareholder Engagement2022 Annual Meeting” on page 13 for more information.60 of this Proxy Statement.



 

iv     2020 Proxy Statement

iv    2022 Proxy Statement


20202022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

We are committed to ensuring that shareholders will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate as they would at an in-person meeting. Our directors and members of our management team will join the virtual meeting and be available for questions and we are committed to answering all relevant questions we receive during the meeting. Shareholders may submit questions during the meeting through the virtual meeting platform at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022. We will address as many questions during the meeting as time permits, but if there are any questions that cannot be addressed due to time constraints or for any other reason, we will post answers to such questions on our website following the meeting. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group them together and provide a single response to avoid repetition. Only questions that are relevant to the purpose of the Annual Meeting or our business will be answered.

Executive Compensation

 

Company Overview

Applied Materials is the leader in the materials engineering solutions used to produce virtually every new chip and advanced display in the world. Our expertise in modifying materials at atomic levels and on an industrial scale enables customers to transform possibilities into reality. At Applied Materials, our innovations make possible the technology shaping the future.Make Possible® a Better Future.

We develop, design, produce and service semiconductor and display equipment for manufacturers that sell into highly competitive and rapidly changing end markets. Our competitive positioning is driven by the ability of our abilitytalented workforce to identify major technology inflections early, and to develop highly differentiated materials engineering solutions for our customers to enable those technology inflections. Through our broad portfolio of products, technologies and technologies,services, innovation leadership and focused investments in research and development, we are enabling our customers’ success and creating significant value for our shareholders. Applied’s ability to hire, develop and retain a world-class global workforce is based on our commitment to creating a Culture of Inclusion that embraces different backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences to build stronger, more resilient teams. Consistent with our core values, we enable our employees to do their best work by providing quality training and learning opportunities; promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion; and upholding a high standard of ethics and respect for human rights.

2019In addition to our other accomplishments, we’ve made significant progress towards our 10-year road map for environmental and social responsibility. At Applied, making a positive contribution is at the foundation of our culture and our vision to Make Possible® a Better Future. Our 1x, 100x and 10,000x sustainability framework refers to the holistic goals and commitments we’ve set for our operations, how we work with customers and suppliers and how our technology can be used to advance sustainability on a global scale. More details of Applied’s ESG vision and strategy, including a copy of the Company’s most recent Sustainability Report, can be found at https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/corporate-responsibility.

Our Performance Highlights

Over the past several years, our broad portfolio of products and services has made Applied a more resilient company that can perform well in a variety of conditions.market environments. In 2019,2021, we delivered solidthe best financial performance against very aggressive targets in Applied Materials’ history while navigating a dynamic and challenging market environment that was affectedimpacted by down cycles in both memory and display equipment spending.the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Key highlights include:

 

  

RevenueRecord revenue of $14.6$23.1 billion, with year-over-year increases of 62% in overall orders, 78% in Semiconductor Systems orders, and 77% in year-end backlog at a company level – to $11.8 billion;

 

  

Operating profitRecord operating income of $3.4$6.9 billion, resulting in GAAP EPS of $2.86,$6.40, and record non-GAAP adjusted operating income of $7.3 billion, resulting in non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $3.04$6.84 (see Appendix A for a reconciliation ofnon-GAAP adjusted measures); and

 

  

DeliveredRecord operating cash flow of $3.2$5.4 billion, equal to 22%23.6% of revenue; andrevenue.

 

  

Returned $3.2 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.

Applied Materials, Inc.    v


Highlights of five-year performance achievements across key financial measures

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Revenue Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Margin Non-GAAP Adjusted EPS +57% $14.7B FY2017 $23.1B FY2021 +3.7 PTS 28.0% FY2017 31.7% FY2021 +105% $3.33 FY2017 $6.84 FY2021

Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin andnon-GAAP adjusted EPS are performance targets under our bonuslong-term incentive and long-term incentivebonus plans. See Appendix A fornon-GAAP reconciliations.



Key financial highlights for our reporting segments in fiscal 2021 include the following:

 

Semiconductor Systems segment: we delivered record annual revenue of $16.3 billion – an increase of 43% year-over-year.

Applied Materials, Inc.    v

Applied Global Services segment: we grew revenue to a record $5.0 billion – an increase of 21% year-over-year, and increased the number of installed base tools covered by long-term service agreements – providing a recurring revenue stream – by 12%, to nearly 15,000.


Display and Adjacent Markets segment: we delivered revenue of $1.6 billion and maintained profitability during an industry down cycle.

Strategic and Operational Highlights

We believeApplied’s strategy is to deliver highly differentiated materials engineering products and services that enable major technology inflections and drive our customers’ success.

LOGO

See inflections early Identify customers' High Value Problems Develop Differentiated Valuable Sustainable products Ensure customer success + Generate residual value

The digital transformation of the electronics industry isglobal economy accelerated in a period of transition as major new growth drivers emergefiscal 2021, making semiconductors more strategically important to the world than in the form ofany time in history. Long-term megatrends including the Internet of Things (IoT), big data and artificial intelligence (AI). In fiscal 2019, we continued are fueling increased demand for semiconductors and driving the need for next-generation silicon technologies. Applied Materials has focused its strategy and investments to focus on initiativesdeliver innovations that will help accelerate our customers’ roadmaps and put Appliedimprovements in the best position for the future.power, performance, area, cost, and time-to-market (PPACt) of next-generation semiconductor devices. Key highlightsstrategic and operational accomplishments during fiscal 2021 include:

Our epi and thermal revenues each grew 70% and chemical mechanical planarization (“CMP”) revenue grew more than 60%.

 

  

We continued to prioritizeexpand our operating expenses towards R&Doffering of Integrated Materials Solutions (“IMS”), which are highly differentiated products that combine multiple process technologies with onboard metrology and sensors within a single system to solve major technology challengesenable unique films, structures, and devices. Our latest IMS system enables a 50% reduction in interconnect resistance at the most advanced foundry-logic nodes and creates a multibillion-dollar opportunity for Applied Materials over the next five years.

vi    2022 Proxy Statement


2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

We launched our innovative AIx (Actionable Insight Accelerator) platform that brings together process tools, sensors, metrology with data analytics and machine learning to accelerate the discovery, development, and commercial deployment of new chip technologies for our customers and drive our long-term growth strategy.customers.

 

  

In addition to advancements in our traditional unit process equipment, we introduced new Integrated Materials Solutions – a new categoryservices business, the tenure of products that combine multiple process steps in a single system to help customers create new types of semiconductor structures and devices.

We strengthened our capabilities to address the growing number of applications within the IoT, communications, automotive, power and sensor markets.

We grew our installed base of semiconductor and display equipment by approximately 2,000 systems to now total nearly 43,000. Also, the number of tools we have under long-term service agreements (which generate subscription-style revenue) has grown from 1.9 years at the end of 2020 to 2.3 years at the end of 2021, and our renewal rate for long-term service agreements increased byto approximately 30% since 2017.90%.

 

  

We expandedcontinued to make substantial progress towards our R&D capabilities by opening the Materials Engineering Technology Accelerator (META Center), astate-of-the-art10-year facility aimed at speeding customer prototyping of new materials, process technologiesroadmap for environmental and devices. The META Center extends Applied’s ability to collaborate with customers to pioneer new ways of improving chip performance, power and cost.social responsibility, as described in more detail on page xii.

Total Shareholder Return Performance

In fiscal 2021, our total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance reflected increased demand for semiconductors and wafer fab equipment driven by the digital transformation of the global economy. As shown below, Applied has substantially outperformed the S&P 500 Index and our peer group over the past five years, reflecting the company’s ability to create unique and innovative materials engineering solutions that accelerate its customers’ technology roadmaps. In addition, from the close of market on the last trading day of fiscal 2021 through the close of market on December 31, 2021, Applied’s stock price increased by approximately 15%.

Fiscal 2017 – Fiscal 2021 Total Shareholder Return vs. S&P 500 and Proxy Peers1

LOGO

450% 400% 350% 300% 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 402% 231% 138% AMAT FY21 Proxy Peers S&P 500

1Reflects results from October 31, 2016 through October 29, 2021, sourced from S&P Capital IQ. Proxy peer data reflects companies set forth on page 31, weighted by market capitalization.

Key Compensation Actions

Performance-Based Compensation Decisions.The Board’s Human Resources and Compensation Committee (“HRCC”(the “HRCC”) approved an aggressive set of scorecard targetsperformance goals for the executive officers for fiscal 2019,2021, including financial targets above any levels that Applied had achieved in the past, as well as equally challenging operational targets. AlthoughNo adjustments were made during the aggressive targets resultedyear to the performance goals or to the Company’s results in below-target bonus payments, the Company expects to see market share growth for calendar year 2019 and also made significant progress on long-term growth initiatives.

determining incentive payouts. During fiscal 2019,2021, Applied delivered solidexceptional financial and operational performanceresults in a challenging environment and made meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals that areremain focused on enabling strong longer-term revenue and EPS growth; however, the results were below aggressively set targets. Accordingly, bonus payouts to our executive officers were below target bonus amounts. growth.

As part of our multi-year incentive program, for the period of 2017 to 2019 through 2021, the HRCC approved aggressive goals fornon-GAAP adjusted operating margin and wafer fabrication equipment (“WFE”) market share.relative total shareholder return. The results for this three-year performance period were aboveexceeded target, resulting in above target levelabove-target vesting of performance share unit awards for our executive officers.



 

Applied Materials, Inc.    vii


viValue Creation Awards. 2020 Proxy StatementAs described in the Company’s 2021 proxy statement, in early fiscal 2021 the HRCC approved long-term value creation awards for Mr. Dickerson, Mr. Durn and Dr. Raja (the “Value Creation Awards”). The HRCC concluded that an incremental incentive opportunity would (i) strengthen the alignment of the officers’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, during a period when Applied can take advantage of significant value creation opportunities resulting from rapid changes in the technology industry, and (ii) help secure the benefit of the officers’ leadership in a highly competitive market for proven executive talent among technology companies, as underscored by Mr. Durn’s subsequent departure. As a result of a number of months of careful deliberation of award design, the awards were structured to:

Be entirely performance-based, requiring the sustained achievement of absolute TSR hurdles to directly align the officers’ interests with those of our shareholders;

Only deliver value at stock price levels that significantly exceed Applied’s then-all-time high stock price on the grant date; and

Cliff vest at the end of a five-year performance period – a substantially longer retention requirement than the annual long-term incentive awards.

Mr. Durn forfeited his award as a result of his departure. The HRCC does not expect to grant similar awards in the coming years. For additional information regarding the Value Creation Awards, please see page 39.

ESG Objective. We have added ESG objectives to the fiscal 2021 annual incentive plan, to measure and incentivize progress towards our long-term ESG goals. While the Company’s ESG goals are long-term in nature, the HRCC believes that it is important to annually assess progress towards those goals. As a result, the HRCC included ESG objectives in the annual incentive program, rather than in long-term incentive awards. For additional information regarding the annual incentive program, please see page 31. For additional information regarding the Company’s ESG goals and accomplishments, please see page xii.

Chief Financial Officer Transition. In October 2021, we announced the departure of our prior Chief Financial Officer, Daniel J. Durn, and the appointment of Robert J. Halliday as Applied’s interim CFO while the Company conducts a search for Mr. Durn’s successor. The structure of the compensation approved for Mr. Halliday, as detailed on page 42, reflects the anticipated limited-term nature of his appointment.

viii    2022 Proxy Statement


20202022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

Stock Price Performance

In fiscal 2019, our stock price performance reflected steady market optimism, particularly in the second half of the year, as the semiconductor market environment showed early signs of strength in foundry and logic spending, and continued reduction in memory inventory levels. Over the past five years, Applied has outperformed the S&P 500 Index, as shown below. In addition, Applied outperformed peers by over 40% in fiscal 2019.

FY2015 – FY2019 Total Shareholder Return vs. Key Peers

LOGO



Applied Materials, Inc.    vii


Primary Compensation Elements and Executive Compensation Highlights for Fiscal 20192021

The primary elements of our compensation program consist of base salary, annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive awards. Other elements of compensation include a 401(k) savings plan, deferred compensation benefits and other benefits programs that are generally available to all employees. Primary elements and highlights of our fiscal 20192021 compensation program for our named executive officers (“NEOs”) (except for Mr. Halliday) were as follows:

 

    Element of Pay 

 

 Structure 

 

 Highlights
             
     

Base Salary

(see page 29)31)

  

 

 

 

Fixed cash compensation for expectedday-to-day responsibilities

 

  

 

 

 

Fiscal 2019Prior to fiscal 2021, only minimal changes to base salaries for each named executive officer (“NEO”) increased from 2018 levels to reflect increases in competitive pay positioning levelsthe NEOs were made for multiple years

  
   

Reviewed annually and adjusted when appropriate, based on scope of responsibility, performance, time in role, experience, and competitive market for executive talent

 

  Reflecting (i) continued strong performance across the business, driven by our executive leadership and (ii) the continuing growth in the size and complexity of the Company, in fiscal 2021 the HRCC approved salary increases ranging from 3% to 15%  
             
     

Annual

Incentive

Bonuses

(see page 29)31)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable compensation paid in cash

 

Based on performance againstpre-established financial, operational, strategic, and individual performance measures

 

Includes assessment of the Company’s progress towards long-term ESG goals

Financial andnon-financial metrics provide a comprehensive assessment of executive performance

 

Performance metrics evaluated annually for alignment with strategy and market trends

 

NEO annual incentives determined through a three-step performance measurement process:

 

 

LOGO     LOGO

Funding Allocation 1 Initial Funding ThresholdPerformance Hurdle Non-GAAP Adjusted EPS 21 Funding Corporate Scorecard Business and Strategic Goals Allocation 2 3 Individual Performance ModifierModifer Individual NEO Performance

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2019No increase in target bonusesbonus as a percentage of base salary were the same asfrom fiscal 2018 levels2020 to fiscal 2021 for allany of the NEOs, except forwith the exception of Mr. Durn, whose target was increased to reflect competitive pay positioning level for annual incentive targets for CFOsHalliday – in connection with his appointment as interim CFO

 

The initial funding thresholdperformance hurdle for fiscal 2021 was $5.25 of non-GAAP adjusted EPS, goalsignificantly above Applied’s actual result for fiscal 20192020. Actual non-GAAP adjusted EPS for fiscal 2021 was $2.90. The Company achieved an actual result of $3.04$6.84

 

As the initial funding thresholdperformance hurdle was achieved,met, annual bonuses for the annual bonusesNEOs were based on the performance of(i) the Company’s results as compared to the objective and quantifiable business and strategic goals in the corporate scorecard for each NEOand (ii) an assessment of individual performance results as compared to quantitative and strategic objectives

 

Based on achievement compared to goals, fiscal 2019 actual annual bonuses

Resulting payouts ranged from 0.49x112% to 0.69x150% of target for our NEOs

 

— Achievement against the corporateCorporate scorecard modifiers ranged from 0.49x1.12x to 0.65x target1.24x (see corporate scorecard information on pages 3234 and 33)35)

 

— Based on an assessment of individualIndividual performance results and the impact against both quantitative and strategic objectives, each NEO, except for Mr. Durn, received an IPF of 1.0x. Mr. Durn received an IPF ofmodifiers ranged from 1.0x to 1.25x in recognition of his above and beyond performance in successfully managing external investor relationships and his vision and execution in driving major improvements in efficiency and effectiveness across the Finance organization (see individual performance highlightsfactor details on page 34)36)

  
                         
             
    

Long-Term

Incentives

(see page 35)37)

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance share units (“PSUs”) to establish rigorous long-term performance alignment

 

Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to provide link to shareholder value creation and for retention value

 

PSUs vest based on achievement of3-yearnon-GAAP3-year non-GAAP adjusted operating margin goal and3-year Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) measured againstTSR relative to the S&P 500 Index

 

PSUs vestsvest at end of3-year performance period, based on achievement of performance goals; RSUs vest ratably over 3 years

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The target vehicle mix of the equity awards consists of 75% PSUs and 25% RSUs for the CEO and 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs for the other NEOs

 

Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin is a key measure of our Company’s long-term success

 

For fiscal 2019, the WFE market share metric applicable for fiscal 2018 PSUs was replaced with relativeRelative TSR which better reflects our growing Display and Services businesses, in addition to our semiconductor segment, and incentivizes management to outperform the market through eachin any business environment

During fiscal 2021, Value Creation Awards were granted to three key executives. These awards are based on absolute TSR to ensure additional alignment with shareholders and will only deliver value to the participants if Applied achieves unprecedented stock price growth during the five-year performance period and if the executives continue their employment with Applied through the performance period

  
  
                  


 

viii     2020 Proxy Statement

Applied Materials, Inc.    ix


2020 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

Pay Mix

In fiscal 2019,2021, a significant portion of our executive compensation consisted of variable compensation and long-term incentives. As illustrated below, 92%95% of CEO compensation for fiscal 2019 comprised2021 consisted of variable compensation elements, and 84% of CEO overall compensation was delivered in equity with multi-year vesting.

 

FY2019Fiscal 2021 Compensation Mix1

CEO

  

All Other NEOs2

 

LOGO

LOGO

Base Salary 5% Annual Incentive Bonus 10% RSU 17% PSU 67% 84% Long-Term Incentives 95% Variable Compensation

  

 

LOGO

LOGO

Base Salary 11% Annual Incentive Bonus 18% RSU 31% PSU 40% 72% Long-Term Incentives 89% Variable Compensation

84% Long-Term Incentives 92% Variable Compensation 76% Long-Term Incentives 87% Variable Compensation

1 Represents total direct compensation for FY2019fiscal 2021, including the grant date fair value of annual equity awards but not including the grant date fair value of the Value Creation Awards, which are not expected to be made in subsequent years and are not representative of ongoing compensation.

2 Excludes Mr. Durn, whose fiscal 2021 compensation reflects only partial-year service, and Mr. Halliday, whose fiscal 2021 compensation is not representative of ongoing NEO compensation.

Summary of 20192021 Total Direct Compensation

The following table summarizes elements of annual total direct compensation for our NEOs for fiscal 2019,2021, consisting of (1) base salary, (2) annual incentive bonus and (3) long-term incentive awards (the grant date fair value of stock awards). This table excludes amounts not considered by the HRCC to be annual total direct compensation, such as certain other amounts required by the SEC to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table (see page 4145 of this Proxy Statement). Additionally, the grant date fair value of the Value Creation Awards is shown separately as these awards are not expected to be made in subsequent years and are not representative of annual total direct compensation.

 

Name and Principal Position  Salary
($)
   

Annual
Incentive
Bonus

($)

   

Annual
Long-Term
Incentive
Award

($)

   

Total

($)

 

Gary E. Dickerson

  

 

1,024,808

 

  

 

1,133,000

 

  

 

11,696,506

 

  

 

13,854,314

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

                    

Daniel J. Durn

  

 

620,673

 

  

 

580,078

 

  

 

3,931,029

 

  

 

5,131,780

 

Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

                    

Ali Salehpour

  

 

620,673

 

  

 

411,750

 

  

 

3,931,029

 

  

 

4,963,452

 

Senior Vice President, Services, Display and Flexible Technology

                    

Prabu G. Raja

  

 

564,058

 

  

 

430,948

 

  

 

2,892,132

 

  

 

3,887,138

 

Senior Vice President, Semiconductor Products Group

                    

Steve G. Ghanayem

  

 

564,058

 

  

 

497,543

 

  

 

2,892,132

 

  

 

3,953,733

 

Senior Vice President, New Markets and Alliances Group

                    


Name and Principal Position  

Salary(1)

($)

   

Annual
Incentive
Bonus

($)

   

Annual
Long-Term
Incentive
Award

($)

   

Total

($)

   

Value
Creation
Award(2)

($)

 

Gary E. Dickerson

  

 

1,049,808

 

  

 

2,039,400

 

  

 

16,696,405

 

  

 

19,785,613

 

  

 

15,014,064

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

                         

Prabu G. Raja

  

 

648,135

 

  

 

1,195,703

 

  

 

4,780,991

 

  

 

6,624,829

 

  

 

4,619,937

 

Senior Vice President, Semiconductor Products Group

                         

Ali Salehpour

  

 

653,942

 

  

 

974,152

 

  

 

4,501,365

 

  

 

6,129,459

 

  

 

—  

 

Senior Vice President, Services, Display and Flexible Technology

                         

Om Nalamasu

  

 

552,789

 

  

 

848,513

 

  

 

3,019,654

 

  

 

4,420,956

 

  

 

—  

 

Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer

                          

Robert J. Halliday(3)

  

 

268,500

 

  

 

351,844

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

620,344

 

  

 

—  

 

Interim Chief Financial Officer

                         

Daniel J. Durn(4)

  

 

681,635

 

  

 

—  

 

  

 

5,312,294

 

  

 

5,993,929

 

  

 

4,619,937

 

Former Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

                         

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    ix
(1)

Fiscal 2021 consisted of 53 weeks.

(2)

Reflects grant date fair value determined for accounting purposes, of non-recurring performance-based awards. The awards only deliver value to participants if total shareholder return hurdles are met during the five-year performance period and only if participants continue their employment with Applied through the end of the performance period, as described in more detail beginning on page 39.

(3)

Mr. Halliday served as a corporate vice president until his appointment as interim CFO effective September 30, 2021. The base salary and annual incentive bonus shown are prorated for service in, and compensation for, those roles.

(4)

Mr. Durn voluntarily terminated his employment with Applied effective October 15, 2021. His base salary was prorated based on his service during fiscal 2021. In connection with his departure, Mr. Durn forfeited his eligibility for the fiscal 2021 annual incentive bonus and all previously awarded and unvested long-term incentive awards (including the Value Creation Award).

x    2022 Proxy Statement


2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Pay and Performance

The HRCC approvessets aggressive performance goals for the CEO, as well as for the entire executive leadership team. As a result, despite outstanding TSR growth from fiscal 20152017 through 2019,2021, our CEO’s ongoing total direct compensation has remained essentially flatwithin a comparable range over the same period. Given the non-recurring nature of the Value Creation Award granted to Mr. Dickerson in early fiscal 2021, that award is not reflected in the chart below. However, the HRCC intends to take the value of that award into consideration when making future compensation decisions for Mr. Dickerson.

 

LOGO

LOGOTotal Direct Compensation (1) Total Shareholder Return (2) $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 Value of $100 Invested on 10/27/2017 FY2017 $14.5 FY2018 $13.7 FY2019 $13.9 FY2020 $17.1 FY2021 $19.8 $60 Annual Total Director Compensation ($ million) $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0

 

(1) 

Total direct compensation consists of annual base salary, annual incentive bonus and long-term incentive award (grant date fair value of annual equity awards). Total direct compensation shown above excludes other amounts required by the SEC to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table.Table and, as discussed above, also excludes the grant date fair value of the Value Creation Award.

(2) 

TSR line illustrates the total shareholder return on our common stock during the period from October 23, 201527, 2017 through October 25, 201929, 2021 (the last business day of fiscal 2019)2021), assuming $100 was invested on October 23, 201527, 2017 and assuming reinvestment of dividends.



 

x     2020 Proxy Statement

Applied Materials, Inc.    xi


2020 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

 

Sustainability and Corporate Social ResponsibilityOur Commitment to ESG

 

Our Approach

Applied is committed to growing ourits business in a sustainable and socially responsible manner. We are focusing our resources and capabilities on addressing the sweeping technological challenges in the era of Artificial Intelligence and big data, and working with our customers to build a safer, more equitable, and sustainable future.

At the heart of Applied’s values is a commitment to operate with responsibility and integrity while making a positive contribution to our industry and the world around us. To drive change and innovation, we are making investments toinvest in our research and development, our operations, our supply chain, and to our interactions with our local communities. We are committed to advancing sustainability, not only through improvements in our own operations but also through investing in technological innovation. We are also committed to transparency and have aligned our disclosures and objectives with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals and leading Environmental, Social, and Governance (“ESG”) reporting frameworks such as those developed by the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) and Global Reporting Initiative (GRI).

Sustainability Framework

In 2020, we launched a new sustainability framework and integrated strategy to guide our ongoing ESG work. Our sustainability framework is called 1x, 100x, 10,000x, and covers our direct impact, the impact of our value chain (customers and suppliers), as well as how we can advance sustainability on a global scale.

LOGO

Lead With Purpose Protect our Planet Innovate for Progress 1X FOR OUR BUSINESS 100X FOR THE INDUSTRY 10,000X FOR THE WORLD

Our Sustainability Commitments

We have announced sustainability commitments for the next decade that we believe will dramatically reduce our environmental impact. Although these goals are aggressive, we believe them to be achievable. We:

Will move to 100% renewable energy in our U.S. operations by 2022;

Aim to move to 100% renewable energy in our global operations by 2030;

Intend to achieve a 50% reduction in our Scope 1 and 2 CO2 emissions by 2030 compared to our 2019 baseline;

Plan to establish science-based targets and will report our Scope 3 emissions by the end of 2022; and

Are committed to report, starting in 2022, in line with the Task Force on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

xii    2022 Proxy Statement


2022 PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

Furthermore, we are committed to building a culture of inclusion for our employees with a focus on leadership, promoting diversity and inclusion, and eliminating systemic barriers to inclusion. In addition, we are providing ongoing career development for employees to encourage innovation and engagement.

Our Fiscal 2021 ESG Accomplishments

To ensure that Applied is able to meet its ambitious long-term ESG goals, we established a set of interim objectives for fiscal 2021. As described in more detail on page 34, the Company’s level of achievement of these objectives was added to the corporate scorecard, which informs bonus payouts for our executive officers. Overall, Applied made substantial progress in all of the framework areas. Key achievements included that we:

 Received the first deliveries of renewable energy from Applied’s investment in a Texas-based wind power project

 Increased women’s representation at Applied in the US and globally

 Controlled Scope 1 and 2 emissions despite unprecedented demand in the semiconductor industry

 Made progress on identifying energy and chemical efficiencies for our semiconductor products

 Began analysis of our Scope 3 carbon footprint, and are on track to set Science Based Targets by the end of 2022

 Significantly increased the quality and transparency of our ESG reporting

 Began to forge efficiency partnerships with multiple customers

 Positively impacted over 10,000 girls through Generation Girl, an Applied Materials Foundation initiative

Sustainability and Corporate Social Responsibility Governance

Our Board and management actively oversee sustainability matters to foster accountability. The Board’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee (the “Governance Committee”) oversees the Company’s overall ESG strategy, policies, and performance. We have established executive leadership of a company-wide strategy on environmental, social and governance (ESG)ESG matters and reporting and are focused on integrating sustainability into our operations and company culture through initiatives aligned to company strategy that address a broad set of stakeholders, including shareholders, customers, employees, suppliers, governments, and our local communities. Our Director of ESG, Corporate Sustainability and Reporting leads ESG efforts across our business and reports to the Governance Committee quarterly.

Our Environmental, Health, and Safety & Sustainability (“EHS”EHSS”) organization is dedicated to maintaining a safe and healthful working environment, demonstrating environmental leadership, and meeting or exceeding regulatory compliance. The Head of EHSEHSS also reports directly to the Board of DirectorsGovernance Committee on a quarterly basis and provides a morein-depth environmental and sustainability update to the Audit Committee on an annual basis. We have a team fully dedicated to supporting our work in designing a culture of inclusion, and ourthe HRCC oversees our corporate culture and human capital management programs, including our diversity and inclusion practices and initiatives. The HRCC approved ESG objectives for our annual bonus program to incentivize our leadership to improve employee safety, engagement and learning and development, to promote a culture of inclusion and to accelerate the representation of women and underrepresented minorities inmaintain progress toward all our workforce.2030 ESG goals. Further details and data on our sustainability and corporate social responsibility practices and accomplishments can be foundare included in our annually published Corporate Social Responsibility Report.

We believe that investing in our people, in our communities, and in operating our business sustainably will drive long-term value for Applied and its shareholders. These three pillars, as described below, provide the framework bySustainability Report, which we manage our key initiatives:can be found at https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/corporate-responsibility.

Sustainability

 

  Conducting business in environmentally conscious, socially responsible and ethical manner while protecting the health and safety of our workers and communityApplied Materials, Inc.    xiii

Guiding principles include designing efficient and sustainable products, pollution prevention, worker protection and ethical business practices

People

Building a culture of inclusion with a focus on leadership, eliminating systemic barriers and fostering engagement

Promoting ongoing career development for employees to encourage innovation and engagement

Community

Investing financial and human resources in communities where we work and live

Investing in education, arts and culture, civic engagement, and the environment

Encouraging employee involvement through charitable donations and volunteer programs



Applied Materials, Inc.    xi


Key InitiativesOur Sustainability Vision and Strategy

 

Diversity and InclusionLead with Purpose  Supply ChainInvest in People

We believe diversethrough a values-based approach to innovation, decision-making and inclusive teams create a richer culture, enhance performance, and attract the best talent.community action

 

  Transparency. Publish diversityOur immediate priority is to protect the health and inclusion informationsafety of our workers, customers, and neighboring communities. In response to highlight initiativesthe uncertainty and accomplishments and provide key diversity data todisruptions of the COVID-19 crisis, our stakeholdersbusiness continuity teams directed a comprehensive response across all the regions where we operate.

 

  Commitment.ContinueWe worked alongside governments and trade associations to build a culture of inclusionkeep critical facilities operating and to accelerate progress towards meeting Company goals of increasing women’s representation globally and underrepresented minorities in our U.S. workforce. Promote the next generation of diverse technology leaders by supporting STEM education programsminimize global supply chain disruptions.

 

  Engagement.Integrate emphasis on diversityTogether with our employees and inclusion in new hire orientation and employee development programs and measure inclusionthe Applied Materials Foundation, we responded to the immediate humanitarian needs in our annual employee surveycommunities by delivering funding, personal protective equipment, and other essential donations.

  We increased diversity on our Board of Directors, refreshed our Standards of Business Conduct, and integrated progress against our 2030 ESG goals into our corporate scorecard and factored it into our executive compensation program.

  

Sustainable supply chains are core to our success,build a deep-rooted Culture of Inclusion and we actively seek to managefoster a diverse and promote global best practices.skilled talent pipeline

 

  Industry Coalition. MemberAmid complex social challenges, we continued to implement our multiyear strategy to foster a meaningful Culture of Responsible Business Alliance (formerly EICC)Inclusion that helps address systemic race and have adopted its Code of Conduct,gender barriers with the objective to promote safe working conditionsbecome the destination employer in supply chains and environmentally-responsible, sustainable and ethical business operationsour industry.

 

  CommitmentWe implemented new tools to High Standards. Requireexpand our sourcing of diverse talent and guide our managers in eliminating bias from our hiring process.

  We achieved our highest-ever level of participation in inclusion training and personal engagement, from top executive leadership through all companiesemployee levels.

  Our commitment to protecting human rights wherever we do business is formalized in our global supply chain to implement Responsible Business Alliance Codenew Human Rights Statement of Conduct and Applied’s Standards of Business ConductPrinciples, which we published in June 2021.

  

EnvironmentProtect our Planet  EthicsInnovate for Progress

We seek to operateby respecting the Earth’s finite resources while enabling growth in our business and develop products in a way that minimizes environmental impact.the data economy

 

  GHG Emissions. CommittedThe tools, processes, and innovations that enabled our company to reducing GHG emissions indeliver during the global COVID-19 crisis, coupled with learnings from our own operationsClimate Risk Assessment, will help us achieve greater efficiency and infootprint reductions across our industries through energy-efficient product design and customer solutionsbusiness as the world emerges from the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic.

 

  Water and Waste Reduction. Our Austin, TX water reclamation project has recycled 5.7 million gallons of water. Our continued focus on recycling increased our 2018 waste diversion rateWe also consider this an opportunity to 81%. Packaging materials now account for roughly 70%accelerate the sustainable transformation of our total recyclablesindustry and of worldwide technology use. We continue to invest in renewable electricity sources. In 2020 we signed a major power purchase agreement for a wind energy project, and commercial operation commenced in late 2021. This project is expected to be a major factor in enabling us to meet our U.S. renewable energy goal.

 

  Renewable Energy.We have additional work to do to decouple our business growth from our environmental footprint. Our onsite green-power generation initiativesScope 1 and 2 emissions in 2018 produced 3.4 Gigawatt hours (the equivalent of powering 2.3 million homes per year). In 2018, 31%2020 increased 5% from the 2019 baseline, due to record production of our energy consumption came from renewable sourcessemiconductor products.

  

We maintain highest ethical standardsto empower transformative innovation that improves technology in interactionsharmony with employees, customers, suppliers, competitors and public.resources

 

  Human Rights. Our StandardsWe are taking an end-to-end, data-driven approach to identify opportunities to innovate across our full network of Business Conduct include several important provisions on human rights, including prohibitions onmanufacturing, logistics, and supply chain—and focusing where we can have the use of child labor or forced, bonded or indentured labor in our operationsgreatest impact.

 

  Conflict Minerals. Committed to responsible sourcingOur Design for Sustainability Center of materialsExcellence is driving groundbreaking sustainability innovation across our product lines, resulting in lower energy and chemical consumption, and driving cost savings for us and our products. Do not directly purchase conflict minerals or have any direct relationship with mines or smelters that process these minerals. Are involved in the Conflict-Free Sourcing Initiative (CFSI)customers.

 

  TrainingWe are piloting new packaging solutions to reduce weight and Business Ethics Helplines. Conduct numerous global training reinforcement programswaste and offer 24/7 Business Ethics Helplinesincrease recyclability, and shifting to intermodal shipping, to decrease the carbon footprint associated with airfreight.

  Following the launch of our new Supply Chain Certification for Environmental and Social Sustainability (SuCCESS2030) initiative in July 2020, we established a SuCCESS2030 Center to oversee and support its implementation.

 



 

xii     2020 Proxy Statement

xiv    2022 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

LOGOLOGO

PROXY STATEMENT

PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nominees

 

 

Applied’s Board of Directors is elected each year at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders. Applied currently has 11ten directors. Dennis D. Powell is retiring from the Board, and his service on our Board will end upon completion of his current term in March 2020. The Board has authorized a reduction in the size of the Board from 11 to ten directors, effective upon the election of directors at the Annual Meeting. Upon the recommendation of the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee, the Board has nominated the ten individuals listed below for election at the Annual Meeting, each of whom currently serves as a director of Applied. These nominees bring a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience, and backgrounds, as well as diverse viewpoints and perspectives to represent the long-term interests of shareholders and to fulfill the leadership and oversight responsibilities of the Board.

If any nominee listed below becomes unable to stand for election at the Annual Meeting, the persons named as

proxies may vote for any person designated by the Board to replace the nominee. Alternatively, the proxies may vote for the remaining nominees and leave a vacancy that the Board may fill later, or the Board may reduce the authorized number of directors. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Board is not aware of any nominee who is unable or will decline to serve as a director.

Each director elected at the Annual Meeting will serve until Applied’s 20212023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders andor until he or she isthey are succeeded by another qualified director who has been elected, or, if earlier, until his or hertheir death, resignation, or removal.

 

 

 ✓

 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR EACH OF THE FOLLOWING DIRECTOR NOMINEES

 

LOGO

Rani Borkar

Corporate Vice President, Azure Hardware Systems and Infrastructure, Microsoft Corporation

Independent Director

Director since 2020

Age 60

Board Committees:

  Strategy and Investment

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  Industry and technology experience

  Executive leadership experience

  Growth and emerging technologies

  Global business experience

  Service, operations and manufacturing

  Strategy and innovation

Rani Borkar has served as Corporate Vice President, Azure Hardware Systems and Infrastructure, at

Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”), a global technology provider, since June 2019. Ms. Borkar also served as Microsoft’s Corporate Vice President, Microsoft Cloud Capacity, Supply Chain and Provisioning, from September 2017 to June 2019. From 2016 to 2017, Ms. Borkar was Vice President, OpenPOWER Development at IBM Corporation, a global technology and consulting company. Prior to IBM, Ms. Borkar worked at Intel Corporation for 27 years, most recently as Intel’s Corporate Vice President and General Manager, Product Development Group. Ms. Borkar is a member of the board for the Global Semiconductor Alliance, and she serves on the Board of Trustees at Oregon State University to help guide the State of Oregon’s effort to advance economic development and innovation.

Applied Materials, Inc.    1


 

 

 

LOGO 

Judy Bruner

 

Executive Vice President, Administration and Chief Financial Officer, SanDisk Corporation (retired)

   

Independent Director

 

Director since 2016

 

Age 6163

 

Board Committees:

  Audit (Chair)

 

  Corporate Governance and Nominating (Chair)

 

  Audit

Other Current Public Boards:

 

  Qorvo, Inc.

Rapid7, Inc.

  Seagate Technology plc

  Varian Medical Systems, Inc.

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

 

  Executive leadershipIndustry and managementtechnology experience

 

  Semiconductor industryExecutive leadership

  Accounting principles, financial controls, financial reporting rules and regulations, and audit procedures

Global business, industry, finance, information technology and operational experience

 

  Risk managementGlobal business experience

  Financial and controlsaccounting expertise

 

  Strategy and innovation

 

  Public company board experienceCybersecurity

  Risk management

 
 

 

Judy Bruner served as Executive Vice President,

Administration and Chief Financial Officer of SanDisk

Corporation, a supplier of flash storage products, from June 2004 until its acquisition by Western Digital in May 2016. Previously, she was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Palm, Inc., a provider of handheld computing and communications solutions, from September 1999 until June 2004. Prior to Palm, Inc., Ms. Bruner held financial management positions at 3Com Corporation, Ridge Computers and Hewlett-Packard Company. She currently serves as a member of the boardsboard of directors of Qorvo, Inc., Rapid7, Inc., and Seagate Technology plc and Varian Medical Systems, Inc.plc. Ms. Bruner previously served as a member of the board of directors of Brocade Communications Systems, Inc., from 2009 until its acquisition in November 2017.2017, and Varian Medical Systems, Inc., from 2016 until its acquisition in April 2021.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    1


 

 

LOGO 

Xun (Eric) Chen

 

Managing Partner,

SB Investments Advisers (US), Inc.

   

Independent Director

 

Director since 2015

 

Age 5052

 

Board Committees:

 

  Human Resources and Compensation

 

  Strategy and Investment

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

 

  Executive leadershipIndustry and managementtechnology experience

 

  Semiconductor industryExecutive leadership experience

  Growth and emerging technologies

 

  Global business industry and operational experience in the technology and information sector

   Mergers and acquisitions, capital markets

 

  Strategy and innovation

 

   Public company board experience

 
 

 

Eric Chen ishas been a Managing Partner of SB Investment

Investment Advisers (US), Inc. (“SBIA”), an investment adviser focused on investments in the technology sector, since March 2018. Prior to joining SBIA, Dr. Chen was the Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder of BaseBit Technologies, Inc., (“Basebit”) a technology company in Silicon Valley. He served as CEO of BaseBit Technologies since it was founded in October 2015, except from March 2016 until December 2017, when BaseBit was a portfolio company of Team Curis Group, a group of integrated biotechnology and data technology companies and laboratories, during which time Dr. Chen served as CEO of Team Curis Group. From 2008 to 2015, Dr. Chen served as a managing director of Silver Lake, a leading private investment firm focused on technology-enabled and related growth industries. Prior to Silver Lake, Dr. Chen was a senior vice president and served on the executive committee of ASML Holding N.V. (“ASML”). He joined ASML following its 2007 acquisition of Brion Technologies, Inc. (“Brion Technologies”), a company he co-founded in 2002 and served as Chief Executive Officer. Prior to Brion Technologies, Dr. Chen was a senior vice president at J.P. Morgan. He served as a member of the boards of directors of Qihoo 360 Technology Co. Ltd. from 2014 to July 2016 and of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (“Varian”) from 2004 until its acquisition by Applied in 2011. Dr. Chen also currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Che Hao Duo Group.

2    2022 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

 

 

LOGO    

Aart J. de Geus

 

Chairman andCo-Chief Executive Officer,

Synopsys, Inc.

   

Independent Director

 

Director since 2007

 

Age 6567

 

Board Committees:

 

  Strategy (Chair)

and Investment

 

Other Current Public Boards:

 

  Synopsys, Inc.

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

 

  Executive leadershipIndustry and global managementtechnology experience

 

  Semiconductor industryExecutive leadership experience

 

  Innovation, management developmentGrowth and understanding of global challenges and opportunitiesemerging technologies

 

  Navigating a company fromstart-up through various stages of growthGlobal business experience

 

  MergersStrategy and acquisitions

  Cybersecurityinnovation

 

  Risk management and controls

  Public company board experience

 
 

 

Aart J.  de Geus is  aco-founder Founder  of  Synopsys,   Inc., a

  provider of electronic design automation software and

related services for semiconductor design companies, and currently serves as its Chairman of the Board of Directors and Co-Chief Executive Officer. Since 1986, Dr. de Geus has held various positions at Synopsys, Inc., including President, Senior Vice President of Engineering and Senior Vice President of Marketing, and has served as a member of its board of directors. From 1982 to 1986, Dr. de Geus was employed by the General Electric Company, a global power, renewable energy, aviation, healthcare and finance company, where he was the Manager of the Advanced Computer-Aided Engineering Group.
 
 
 
 
 

2    2020 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

 

 

LOGO 

Gary E. Dickerson

 

President and Chief Executive Officer,

Applied Materials, Inc.

  

Director since 2013

 

Age 6264

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

 

  Executive leadershipIndustry and managementtechnology experience

 

  Semiconductor industryExecutive leadership experience

  Growth and emerging technologies

 

  Global business industry and operational experience

 

  Extensive engineeringService, operations and technological leadershipmanufacturing

 

  Understanding of complex industryStrategy and global challengesinnovation

 

  Expertise in driving strategy, innovation and product developmentRisk management

 
 

 

Gary  E.  Dickerson  has  been  President of  Applied  since June 2012 and  Chief  Executive  Officer and a  member

of the Board of Directors of Applied

since September 2013. Mr. Dickerson was named President of Applied in June 2012, after joiningjoined Applied following its acquisition in November 2011 of Varian Semiconductor Equipment Associates, Inc. (“Varian”), a supplier of semiconductor manufacturing equipment. Mr. Dickerson had served as Chief Executive Officer and a director of Varian since 2004. Prior to joining Varian in 2004, Mr. Dickerson served 18 years with KLA-Tencor Corporation, a supplier of process control and yield management solutions for the semiconductor and related industries, where he held a variety of operations and product development roles, including President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Dickerson started his semiconductor career in manufacturing and engineering management at General Motors’ Delco Electronics Division and then AT&T, Inc.

 

LOGO

Stephen R. Forrest

Professor of Electrical Engineering & Computer

Science, Physics, and Materials Science &

Engineering, University of Michigan

Independent Director

Director since 2008

Age 69

Board Committees:

  Audit

  Strategy

  Investment

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

  Semiconductor, displays and alternative energy technologies

  Research and development portfolio management

  Government policy

  Strategy, innovation, technology licensing and product commercialization

  Establishing partnerships to develop businesses in new markets focused on alternative energy and other technologies

Stephen R. Forrest holds faculty appointments as

Professor of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, as Professor of Physics, and as Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at the University of Michigan, and leads the University’s Optoelectronics Components and Materials Group. Dr. Forrest also has been the lead editor of Physical Review Applied, a scientific journal covering engineering, physics and technologies, since June 2017. From January 2006 to December 2013, Dr. Forrest also served as Vice President for Research at the University of Michigan. From 1992 to 2005, Dr. Forrest served in a number of positions at Princeton University, including Chair of the Electrical Engineering Department, Director of the Center for Photonics and Optoelectronic Materials, and director of the National Center for Integrated Photonic Technology. Prior to Princeton, Dr. Forrest was a faculty member of the Electrical Engineering and Materials Science Departments at the University of Southern California. Dr. Forrest has participated in the founding of five companies commercializing fiber optic components, displays, lighting and solar cells.
  
Applied Materials, Inc.    3

Applied Materials, Inc.    3


 

 

LOGO 

Thomas J. Iannotti

 

Senior Vice President and General Manager,

Enterprise Services, Hewlett-Packard Company

(retired)

   

Chairman of the Board

 

Independent Director

 

Director since 2005

 

Age 6365

 

Board Committees:

 

  Human Resources and Compensation (Chair)

 

Other Current Public Boards:

  Atento S.A.

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

 

  Service management forIndustry and technology companies on a global, regional and country levelexperience

 

  SeniorExecutive leadership and management experience

 

  Global business industry and operational experience

 

  International strategicService, operations and business developmentmanufacturing

 

  Public company board experienceStrategy and innovation

  Risk management

 
 

 

Thomas J. Iannotti served as Senior Vice President

and General Manager, Enterprise Services, for Hewlett-Packard Company, a technology solutions provider to consumers, businesses and institutions globally, from February 2009 until his retirement in October 2011. From 2002 to January 2009, Mr. Iannotti held various executive positions at Hewlett-Packard, including Senior Vice President and Managing Director, Enterprise Business Group, Americas. From 1978 to 2002, Mr. Iannotti worked at Digital Equipment Corporation, a vendor of computer systems and software, and at Compaq Computer Corporation, a supplier of personal computing systems, after its acquisition of Digital Equipment Corporation. Mr. Iannotti currently servespreviously served as lead directorChairman of the board of directors of Atento S.A. (ATTO).
 

 

 

LOGO 

Alexander A. Karsner

 

Senior Strategist, X (parent company: Alphabet Inc.)

  

Independent Director

 

Director since 2008

 

Age 5254

 

Board Committees:

 

  Corporate Governance and Nominating

Human Resources and Compensation

Other Current Public Boards:

  Corporate Governance and NominatingExxon Mobil Corporation

  Broadscale Acquisition Corp.

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

 

  Expertise in public policyIndustry and government relationstechnology experience

 

  Domestic and international trade, development and investment marketsExecutive leadership experience

 

  CybersecurityGrowth and emerging technologies

 

  Environment and sustainability, including renewable energy policy, technologies and commercialization

  Entrepreneurial leadershipGlobal business experience

 

  Strategy and innovation

 

  Public company board experienceRisk management

  Government policy and sustainability

 
 

 

Alexander A. Karsner is Senior Strategist at X, the innovation lab of Alphabet Inc. Mr. Karsner is also Executive Chairman of Elemental Labs, which pursues

market transformation through nature-based solutions. He is also the Founder and has been the Chief Executive Officer of Manifest Energy Inc., an energy technology development and investment firm, since July 2009, and has served as its Executive Chairman since January 2013. From January 2016 to July 2019, Mr. Karsner most recently served as Managing Partner of Emerson Collective, an investment platform funding non-profit, philanthropic and for-profit portfolios advancing education, immigration, the environment and other social innovation initiatives, from January 2016 to July 2019. Prior to this, Mr. Karsner has been Founder and CEO of Manifest Energy Inc., an energy technology development and investment firm, since July 2009, and has served as its Executive Chairman since January 2013.initiatives. From March 2006 to August 2008, he served as Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy at the U.S. Department of Energy, and exercised a diplomatic role as a principal in the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change.Energy. From August 2002 to March 2006, Mr. Karsner was Founder and Managing Director of Enercorp, a private company involved in international project development, management and financing of energy infrastructure. Mr. Karsner has also worked with Tondu Energy Systems of Texas, Wartsila Power Development of Finland and other multi-national energy firms and developers. He is a Precourt Energy Scholar at Stanford University’s School of Civil and Environmental Engineering, andcurrently serves on Advisory Boards of MIT Medialab, and the Polsky Center for Entrepreneurship at the University of Chicago’s Booth School of Business. Mr. Karsner served as a member of the board of directors of Codexis, Inc. from 2009 to 2014, as well as Argonne National Laboratory,Exxon Mobil Corporation and was previously an Associate of the Harvard Kennedy School. He presently is on the board of Conservation International and director emeritus of the National Marine Sanctuaries Foundation. He is a Life Member of the Council of Foreign Relations and the Trilateral Commission, Distinguished Fellow of the Council on Competitiveness and a Henry Crown Fellow of the Aspen Institute.Broadscale Acquisition Corp.

 

4    2020 Proxy Statement

4    2022 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 1—ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO 

Adrianna C. Ma

 

ManagingOperating Partner, Haleakala Holdings LLCIndex Ventures

  

Independent Director

 

Director since 2015

 

Age 4648

 

Board Committees:

 

  Investment (Chair)Audit

  Audit

  Corporate GovernanceStrategy and NominatingInvestment

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

 

  BroadIndustry and technology experience with technology companies

 

  Expertise in global growth investmentExecutive leadership experience

  Growth and emerging technologies

  Global business experience

 

  Financial and accounting expertise

 

  MergersStrategy and acquisitions, capital marketsinnovation

 

  Board experience with technology-enabled growth companiesRisk management

 
 

 

Adrianna C. Ma has servedcurrently serves as the Operating Partner of Index Ventures, a venture capital firm she joined in September 2020. Prior to joining Index

Ventures, Ms. Ma was Managing Partner of Haleakala Holdings LLC, her personal investment firm, since July 2019. From May 2015 to June 2019,

she was a Managing Partner at the Fremont Group, a private investment company where she was responsible for a portfolio of funds, including its investment strategy, asset allocation, manager selection and risk management. From 2005 to April 2015, Ms. Ma served as a Managing Director at General Atlantic LLC (“General Atlantic”), a global growth equity firm, where she invested in and served on the boards of directors of technology-enabled growth companies around the world. Prior to joining General Atlantic, Ms. Ma worked at Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated as an investment banker in the Mergers, Acquisitions and Restructuring Department. Ms. Ma previously served as a member of the board of directors of Jagged Peak Energy Inc. from 2019 to 2020 and C&J Energy Services, Inc. from 2013 to 2015.
 
   

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

 

Yvonne McGill

 

Corporate Controller and Infrastructure Solutions

Group Chief Financial Officer Senior Vice President, Infrastructure Solutions Group and Global Financial Planning and Analysis

Dell Technologies, Inc.

   

Independent Director

 

Director since 2019

 

Age 5254

 

Board Committees:

 

  Audit

 

  Corporate Governance and Nominating

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

 

  Executive leadershipIndustry and managementtechnology experience

 

  Accounting principles, financial controls, financial reporting rules and regulations, and audit proceduresExecutive leadership experience

 

  Global business industryexperience

  Financial and operational experience in the technology sectoraccounting expertise

  Strategy and innovation

  Risk management

  
 

 

Yvonne McGill has been Corporate Controller and

Infrastructure Solutions Group Chief Financial Officer since February 2020, and previously was Chief Financial Officer and

Senior Vice President, Infrastructure Solutions Group since March 2018 and Senior Vice President, Global Financial Planning and Analysis since August 2015 at Dell Technologies, Inc., a leading global end-to-end technology provider, with a comprehensive portfolio of IT hardware, software and service solutions spanning both traditional infrastructure and emerging, multi-cloud technologies. Ms. McGill served in various other finance leadership roles since joining Dell in 1997. Prior to Dell, Ms. McGill worked at ManTech International Corporation and Price Waterhouse. She is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive). Ms. McGill also currently serves on the Susan G. Komen Greater and Central Texas Foundation Board.
 
    

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    5

Applied Materials, Inc.    5


 

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

Scott A. McGregor

 

President and Chief Executive Officer,

Broadcom Corporation (retired)

   

Independent Director

 

Director since 2018

 

Age 6365

 

Board Committees:

 

  Audit

  Strategy and Investment (Chair)

 

Other Current Public Boards:

 

  Equifax Inc. (since October 2017)

 

Key Qualifications and Expertise:

 

  Executive leadershipIndustry and managementtechnology experience

 

  Semiconductor industryExecutive leadership experience

  Growth and emerging technologies

 

  Global business industryexperience

  Financial and operational experienceaccounting expertise

 

  Strategy innovation, management development and understanding of global challenges and opportunitiesinnovation

 

  Cybersecurity

 

  Public company board leadershipRisk management

 
 

 

Scott A. McGregor served as President and Chief

Executive Officer and as a member of the board of directors of Broadcom Corporation, a world leader in wireless connectivity, broadband, automotive and networking infrastructure, from 2005 until the company was acquired by Avago Technologies Limited in February 2016. Mr. McGregor joined Broadcom from Philips Semiconductors (now NXP Semiconductors), where he was President and Chief Executive Officer. He previously served in a range of senior management positions at Santa Cruz Operation Inc., Digital Equipment Corporation (now part of HP), Xerox PARC and Microsoft, where he was the architect and development team leader for Windows 1.0. Mr. McGregor currently serves as a member of the board of directors of Equifax Inc., and Luminar Technologies. He previously served as a member of the boardsboard of directors of Ingram Micro Inc., Luminar Technologies, TSMC, and Xactly Corporation.Xactly.
 
 
 
 
  

Chairman Emeritus

 

 

James C. Morgan became Chairman Emeritus in March 2009, following his retirement as our director and Chairman of the Board. Mr. Morgan spent more than 31 years as a director and employee of Applied, including over 20 years as Chairman of the Board.

Mr. Morgan first joined Applied in 1976 and served as Chief Executive Officer from 1977 to 2003. As Chairman Emeritus, Mr. Morgan does not attend any Board or Committee meetings, has no voting rights and receives no retainer or meeting fees.

 

 

6    2020 Proxy Statement

6    2022 Proxy Statement


BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

Board Composition and Nominee Considerations

 

 

Nominee Skills and Experience

Our director nominees haveThe Board values having directors who possess a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, and collectively bring to our Board diverse viewpoints and perspectives, that

strengthen its ability toand effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders. The chart

Listed below illustrates broad categoriesare certain of the key skills and expertiseexperience that the Board considers important for our director nominees offer that we believedirectors to have in light of our current business in order to contribute to the effective leadership and exercise of oversight responsibilities by the Board.

 

 

Industry and TechnologyExperience with and knowledge of our industry and technologies, as well as our end markets, facilitate a deeper understanding within the Board of our equipment and service products and the markets in which we compete.
Executive LeadershipExperience in executive-level positions at large multi-national companies, including public company board experience, contribute practical insight into our business strategy and operations.
Growth and Emerging TechnologiesExperience identifying and developing emerging technologies are important to our growth strategies and provide important insights as we develop new technologies and our business grows into new areas.
Global BusinessExperience in a leadership role at an organization with substantial global operations can provide valuable business and cultural perspectives.
Financial and AccountingExperience with financial markets, financing operations, and accounting and financial reporting processes provide important oversight of our capital structure, financing activities, and financial reporting and internal controls.
Service, Operations and ManufacturingExperience with and understanding of service management and service offerings for technology companies, manufacturing operations and other operational processes contributes to understanding our business and also can provide important insights on the operations of our customers.
Strategy and InnovationExperience in setting and executing corporate strategy and with strategic transactions is important to the successful planning and execution of our long-term vision.
CybersecurityExperience managing cybersecurity, information and data security risks or cybersecurity threats can provide important input to the Board in its oversight of the company’s cybersecurity risks.
Risk ManagementExperience overseeing enterprise risk management or business continuity planning in a large organization, or other experience in managing risk at the enterprise level or in a senior compliance or regulatory role, provide important input to the Board in its oversight of the Company’s enterprise risk management program.
Government Policy and SustainabilityExperience working with government policy offers us insight into the regulatory environment in which we operate and experience with sustainability initiatives contributes to the Board’s oversight of our Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) strategy.

 

LOGO  

LOGO

Applied Materials, Inc.    7

Semiconductor Industry & Technology Financial


Board Matrix. The matrix below summarizes certain of the key experiences, qualifications, skills, and Accounting Global Business Strategy and Innovation Operations and Infrastructure Government Policy M&A and Organizational Growth Risk Management Public Company Board Experience Executive Leadership Independence 9 of 10attributes that our director nominees bring to the Board to enable effective oversight. This matrix is intended to provide a summary of our director nominees’ qualifications and is not a complete list of each director nominee’s strengths or contributions to the Board. Additional details on each director nominee’s experiences, qualifications, skills, and attributes are independent Diversity 40% of director nominees are ethnically and/or gender diverse 30% are female 20% are ethnically diverse Tenure 2 directors added to Board over last 2 years 10 years tenure 4 directors 4-10 years tenure 3 directors 0-4 years tenure 3 directorsset forth in their biographies.

Skills and Experience 

LOGO

Borkar

 

LOGO

Bruner

 

LOGO

Chen

 

LOGO

De Geus

 

LOGO

Dickerson

 

LOGO

Iannotti

 

LOGO

Karsner

 

LOGO

Ma

 

LOGO

McGill

 

LOGO

McGregor

Industry and Technology

          

Executive Leadership

          

Growth and Emerging Technologies

   

 

     

 

    

 

 

Global Business

          

Financial and Accounting

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

Service, Operations and Manufacturing

   

 

  

 

  

 

    

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Strategy and Innovation

          

Cybersecurity

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Risk Management

  

 

   

 

       

Government Policy and Sustainability

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

Tenure and Independence

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Tenure (years)

 1 5 6 14 8 16 13 6 2 4

Independence

      

 

     

Demographics

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Age

 60 63 52 67 64 65 54 48 54 65

Gender Identity

 F F M M M M M F F M

African American or Black

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Alaskan Native or Native American

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Asian

   

 

   

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

   

 

  

 

Hispanic or Latinx

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

White

  

 

   

 

      

 

  

LGBTQ+

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

  

 

 

Diversity.Diversity. Our Board values having a Board that reflects diverse perspectives, including those based on gender, ethnicity, skills, experience at policy-making levels in areas that are relevant to the Company’s global activities, and functional, geographic, or cultural backgrounds. In 2019 theOur Board has adopted a Policy on Board Diversity within our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which reflects the Board’s commitment to actively seek out women and ethnically diverse director candidates and to consider the factors above, among others, in the context of the current composition of the Board and needs of the Company when identifying and evaluating director candidates.

The 10ten director nominees for election at our 20202022 Annual Meeting bring to our Board a variety of different backgrounds,

skills, professional and industry experience, and other attributes and perspectives that contribute to the overall diversity of our Board.

Independence.Independence. The Board’s Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee expects eachnon-employee director to be free of relationships, interests or affiliations that could give rise to conflicts of interest or interfere with the director’s exercise of independent judgment. Applied’s Corporate Governance Guidelines require that a majority of our directors must be independent, and that our

Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, and Governance Committees must consist solely of independent directors.

Director independence is determined under Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules. The Board has affirmatively determined that,

8    2022 Proxy Statement


BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

other than Mr. Dickerson, our Chief Executive Officer, all members of the Board who served during 20192021 and all director nominees other than Mr. Dickerson, our Chief Executive Officer, are independent under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules.

Tenure.Tenure. The Board believes that new ideas and perspectives are critical to a forward-looking and strategic Board, as are the valuable experiences and deep understanding of Applied’s business and industries that longer-serving directors offer. Our Governance Guidelines do not impose a term limit on Board service;service, but our directors are not typically nominated forre-election after they reach the age of 70. Feedback from the annual Board evaluations and individual discussions between eachnon-employee director and our Chairman isChair are an important determinant of Board tenure. OurAs a result of our ongoing Board refreshment hasefforts, we have added two new directors to the Board over the last twothree years, andwhich has resulted in a balanced range of tenures, which ensuresensuring both continuity and fresh perspectives among our director nominees.

Applied Materials, Inc.    7


Our nominees have an average tenure of 7slightly less than eight years, which is lower thanmatches the average tenure for independent directors of other S&P 500 companies, and three of our nominees have been memberscompanies.

Key Attributes of the Board for four years or less.

 

Regular

refreshment

resulting in

average director

tenure of 7 years

LOGO

 

LOGO

Independence 9 of 10 directors are independent Diversity 50% of the Board is ethnically and/or gender diverse 40% are female 30% are ethnically diverse1 Tenure 2 directors added to the Board over last 3 years Regular refreshment resulting in average director tenure of less than 8 years > 10 years 4-10 years < 4 years 3 directors 4 directors 3 directors 1 - Ethnically diverse means a director who self-identifies as one or more of the following (defined by Nasdaq as an Underrepresented Minority): Black or African American, Hispanic or Latinx, Asian, Native American or Alaska Native or Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander

Board Composition and Refreshment

Identification of New Director Candidates. Identifying and recommending individuals for nomination and election to our Board is a principal responsibility of our Governance Committee, which performs this function through an ongoing, year-round process.

The Governance Committee regularly considers the size and composition of the Board and assesses whether the

composition appropriately aligns with the Company’s evolving business and strategic needs. The focus is on ensuring that the Board is composed of directors who possess a wide variety of relevant skills, professional experience and backgrounds, bring diverse viewpoints and perspectives, and effectively represent the long-term interests of shareholders. In accordance with the Policy on Board Diversity, including our commitment to having a Board that reflects diverse perspectives, the Governance Committee actively seeks out women and ethnically diverse director candidates, as well as candidates diverse in skills, experience at policy-making levels in areas that are relevant to our global activities, and functional, geographic, or cultural background.

In its consideration of potential director candidates, the Governance Committee reviews the short-short-term and long-term strategies and interests of the Company to determine what current and future skills and experiences are required of the Board in exercising its oversight function. Specific search criteria evolve over time to reflect the Company’s dynamic business and strategic needs and the changing composition of the Board, and may include such factors as:

 

  Operating experience or thought leadership in key markets, industries, technologies, or business models that are aligned with the Company’s strategic growth plans;

 

  Business or cultural background in regions where the Company does significant business;

 

  Senior executive leadership and management experience; and

 

  Subject matter expertise in such areas as corporate finance and financial reporting, governance, compensation, risk management, and marketing.

In accordance with the Policy on Board Diversity, the Governance Committee actively seeks out women and ethnically diverse director candidates.

The Governance Committee also considers succession planning in light of anticipated retirements, and for Board and Committee Chair roles, to maintain relevant expertise and depth of experience.

In addition, all director candidates are also expected to possess or demonstrate:

 

  Sound judgment, analytical and inquisitive perspective, and practical wisdom;

 

  Strategic mindset and an engaged and collaborative approach;

 

  Independence, personal and professional ethics, integrity and values; and

 

  Commitment to representing the long-term interests of Applied’s shareholders.

The Governance Committee may retain a search firm to assist in identifying and evaluating new candidates for director nominees and may also consider referrals from directors, shareholders, or other sources. Ms. McGill, who joined our Board in July 2019, was identified and vetted as a potential candidate by a third-party search firm for consideration by the Governance Committee. The Governance Committee evaluates and interviews potential Board candidates and makes appointment recommendations to the full Board. All members of the Board may interview candidates.

Recent Board Refreshment. As a result of the foregoing process, the Board has added two new directors over the last two years, each of whom have brought valuable and diverse backgrounds and perspectives to the overall composition of the Board. The most recent appointment was Ms. McGill in July 2019. Ms. McGill is a segment chief financial officer for Dell Technologies, Inc. who brings to our Board executive leadership and management experience, as well as global business, industry and operational experience in the technology sector. Her financial and accounting background provides key experience and expertise to the Board, as Mr. Dennis Powell, Chair of the Audit Committee, prepares to retire upon completion of his current term in March 2020.

 

 

8    2020 Proxy Statement

Applied Materials, Inc.    9


BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

Regular Review of Board Composition

Drives Refreshment

LOGO

LOGO

1 Assess Develop a search profile of relevant skills, background and experience sought in new directors 2 Identify Information provided to third-party search firms Potential candidates identified by independent directors, shareholders, independent search firm, our people 3 Evaluate Governance Committee screens candidates for qualifications, skills, diversity, independence and potential conflicts Candidates meet with directors 4 Recommend Governance Committee recommends selected candidates to the Board Results Two new directors over the last three years

Recent Board Refreshment. As a result of the foregoing process, the Board has added two new directors over the last three years, each of whom has brought valuable and diverse backgrounds and perspectives to the Board. The most recent appointment was Ms. Borkar in December 2020, who is Corporate Vice President, Azure Hardware Systems and Infrastructure at Microsoft. In this role, she leads the core organizations building Microsoft’s cloud computing platform, including silicon, systems, and supply chain. Ms. Borkar has extensive experience in semiconductor design, having served in engineering and executive roles at IBM Corporation and

Intel Corporation. Ms. Borkar brings to our Board experience in the semiconductor industry, chip design, and cloud computing, as well as leadership and management experience.

Re-nomination of Directors for Election at Annual Meeting. In considering whether to recommendre-nomination of a director for election at our Annual Meeting, the Governance Committee considers factors such as:

 

  The extent to which the director’s skills, qualifications and experience continue to contribute to the success of our Board, taking into account current core competencies of the Board, and the mix of skills and experience desired;

 

  Feedback from the annual Board evaluations and individual discussions between eachnon-employee director and our Chairman;Chair;

 

  Attendance and participation at, and preparation for, Board and Committee meetings;

 

  Shareholder feedback, including the support received by director nominees elected at our 20192021 Annual Meeting;

 

  Outside board and other affiliations, including any actual or perceived conflicts of interest; and

 

  Considerations under the Board’s Policy on Board Diversity and the extent to which the director continues to contribute to the diversity of our Board.

Based on the Governance Committee’s recommendation, the Board selects director nominees and recommends them for election by Applied’s shareholders.

Shareholder Recommendations or Nominations. The evaluation procedures described above apply to all candidates for director nomination, including candidates submitted by shareholders. Shareholders wishing to recommend a candidate for consideration by the Governance Committee should submit the candidate’s name, biographical data and a description of his or hertheir qualifications in light of the criteria listed above to Christina Y. Lai,Teri A. Little, Corporate Secretary, Applied Materials, Inc., 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1268, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95052, or bye-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com.

Shareholders wishing to nominate a director should follow the specific procedures set forth in our Bylaws.

 

 

10    2022 Proxy Statement


BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

Corporate Governance

 

 

Corporate Governance Guidelines

Applied’s Corporate Governance Guidelines establish the governance framework within which the Board conducts its business and fulfills its responsibilities. These guidelines and other important governance materials are available on our website at: http://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/

investor-relations/governance-documents.governance-documents. The Board regularly reviews our Corporate Governance Guidelines in light of legal and regulatory requirements, evolving best practices and other developments. In December 2019, the Board formalized its focus on diversity by adopting a Policy on Board Diversity within our Corporate Governance Guidelines as described above on page 7 under “Diversity.”

Applied Materials, Inc.    9


Board Leadership

Our corporate governance framework provides the Board flexibility to determine the appropriate leadership structure for the Company and whether the roles of ChairmanChair and CEO should be separated or combined. In making this determination, the Board considers many factors, including the needs of the business, the Board’s assessment of its leadership needs from time to time, and the best interests of shareholders. If the role of ChairmanChair is filled by a director who does not qualify as an independent director, the Boardindependent directors will designate a Lead Independent Director.

The Board believes that it is currently appropriate to separate the roles of ChairmanChair and CEO. The CEO is responsible for setting our strategic direction and theday-to-day leadership of our business, while the Chairman,Chair, along with the rest of our independent directors, ensures that the Board’s time and attention are focused on effective oversight of the matters most critical to Applied. Mr. Iannotti, an independent director, currently serves as the ChairmanChair of the Board. Mr. Iannotti has significant experience and knowledge of Applied, workingincluding having worked with two CEOs and different management teams at Applied, and the Board believes that his deep knowledge of the Company and industry, as well as his strong leadership and governance experience, enable him to lead the Board effectively and independently.

Director Onboarding and Education

When new directors join theour Board, they participate in a comprehensive onboarding program to learn about our industry, business, strategies, and policies. Themulti-day onboarding program includes meetings with senior executives to discuss our businesses, strategy, operations, and our corporate functions such as finance, technology, information systems and legal, and a tour of the Maydan Technology Center, ourstate-of-the-art R&D facilities.facility. New directors also meet with the executives and staff supporting the Committees on which they sit, as well as the Committees’ external consultants and advisors. Each new director is also partnered

with an experienced fellow director “mentor” to facilitate the integration of the new director to the Board.

For continued education regarding our business and industry, we provide presentations by internal and external experts during Board meetings on topics such as technology inflections, industry trends, changes in the geopolitical and macroeconomic landscape, and the ESG landscape, with particular focus on the implications and impact to the

Company. Our Board and Committees also regularly review developments in corporate governance to continue enhancing the Board’s effectiveness. We encourage directors to participate in external continuing director education programs and provide reimbursement for expenses associated with this participation. Throughout the year, Board members also attend Company events, including Analyst Day, our Engineering and Technology (ET) Conference, and Diversity Day. In addition, in 2019, the Board held Board and Committee meetings at our offices in Taiwan, where directors attended the grand opening of our new Display Equipment Manufacturing Center and R&D Laboratory, participated in a local employeeall-hands meeting and met with our regional executives. These interactions, along with meetings with leaders below the CEO Executive Staff level throughout the year, give directors additional visibility to provide oversight of the Company’s culture, strategies, and operations.

Board and Committee Evaluations

Our Board recognizes that a thorough, constructive evaluation process enhances our Board’s effectiveness and is an essential element of good corporate governance. Each year, the Governance Committee, in consultation with our independent Board Chairman,Chair, reviews and determines the design, scope, content, and execution of the evaluation process, including whether to engage a third party to facilitate the evaluation.

The evaluation process consists of assessments of the Board, each standing committee of the Board and individual directors. Written questionnaires solicit feedback on a range of issues, including Board and Committee structure and composition; meeting process and dynamics; execution of key responsibilities; interaction with management; and information and resources.

Following completion of the written questionnaires, aggregated results, including all written comments, together with data analyzing results compared to the prior year, are provided to the Chairman,Chair, who meets with each director individually to discuss additional input on these topics and to provide individual feedback. Committee chairs lead a discussion of evaluation results for their respective Committees and a summary of Board and Committee evaluation results is discussed with the full Board, including suggestions for updating policies and practices per evaluation results. Director suggestions for improvements to the evaluation questionnaires and process are considered for incorporation for the following year.

 

 

10    2020 Proxy Statement

Applied Materials, Inc.    11


BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

20192021 Board Evaluation Process

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Questionnaire One-on-One Discussions Board Report Closed Session Evaluation questionnaire provides director feedback on an unattributedanonymized basis One-on-One Discussions Candid,Non-anonymized questionnaires provided to Chair to facilitate candid, one-on-one discussions between the Chairman andwith each director, to solicitwhere the Chair solicits additional feedback and provideprovides individual feedback Board Report Board and Committee evaluation results provided to the full Board Closed Session Closed session discussion of Board and Committee evaluations led by our ChairmanChair and independent Committee chairs Policies and practices are updated as appropriate per evaluation results and discussions

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

One of the Board’s most important functions is overseeing risk management for the Company. Applied’s risk oversight framework illustrated below shows the close interaction between the full Board, individual committees, and senior management.

 

LOGO

LOGO

Applieds management has day-to-day responsibility for: Identifying risks and assessing them in relation to Company strategies and objectives; Implementing suitable risk mitigation plans, processes and controls; and Appropriately managing risks in a manner that serves the best interests of Applied, its shareholders and other stakeholders Management regularly reports to the Board on its risk assessments and risk mitigation strategies for the major risks of our business. Senior management and other employees also report to the Board and its committees from time to time on risk-related issues The Board The Board has the ultimate responsibility for, and is actively engaged in, oversight of the Companys risk management, in some cases directly by the full Board, and in some cases through delegation of certain types of risks to the oversight of the appropriate Board Committee. The full Board oversees risks and opportunities associated with ESG matters.Committee COMMITTEES Audit Oversees the enterprise risk management program, as well as risks related to financial, regulatory, compliance, cybersecurity and environmental, health and safety matters, and regularly reviews with management, the head of internal audit and the independent accountants the steps taken to monitor and mitigate risk exposures Governance Oversees the management of risks related to corporate governance matters, including director independence, Board composition and succession, shareholder communications, and overall Board effectiveness HR & Compensation Oversees risks associated with Applieds compensation policies, plans and practices, organizational talent and culture, management succession, and human capital management, including the corporate culture, and diversity and inclusion programs and initiatives Management Applieds management has day-to-day responsibility for: Identifying risks and assessing them in relation to Company strategies and objectives; Implementing suitable risk mitigation plans, processes and controls; and Appropriately managing risks in a manner that serves the best interests of Applied, its shareholders and other stakeholders. Management regularly reports to the Board on its risk assessments and risk mitigation strategies for the major risks of our business. Senior management and other employees also report to the Board and its committees from time to time on risk-related issues.

 

Applied has implemented an enterprise risk management (“ERM”) program, overseen by the Audit Committee, which provides an enterprise-wide perspective on Applied’s risks. The risks identified are reported to the Board, with a focus on the most significant risks facing the Company, including strategic,

operational, financial, and legal and compliance risks. Oversight responsibility for a particular risk may fall

within an area of responsibility and expertise of one of the Board Committees. Management reviews the ERM program activities regularly with the Audit Committee, presents an analysis of risk mitigation

Applied Materials, Inc.    11


strategies to the Board or the respective Committee with oversight responsibility for the risk, and provides annual risk mitigation updates to the full Board.

12    2022 Proxy Statement


BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

Risk Assessment of Compensation Programs. We have assessed our compensation policies, plans, and practices, and determined that they do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on Applied. To make this determination, our management reviewed ourApplied’s compensation policies, plans, and practices, and assessed the following aspects: design, payment methodology, potential payment volatility, relationship to our financial results, length of performance period, risk-mitigating features, performance measures and goals, oversight and controls, and plan features and values compared to market practices. Management reviewed its analysis with the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, which agreed with this determination. Applied also has in place various controls to mitigate risks relating to compensation policies, plans, and practices, such as executive stock ownership guidelines and a clawback policy that enables the recovery of certain incentive compensation payments in certain circumstances.

Management Succession Planning

The Board has delegatedand the HRCC recognize that developing the capabilities of Applied’s executives is vital to our ability to capitalize on our opportunities and increase long-term shareholder value. Accordingly, the Human ResourcesHRCC’s most important goal is to oversee the Company’s programs that foster executive capability and Compensation Committee (“HRCC”) primary responsibility for overseeingretention, with emphasis on leadership development, management capabilities, and succession plans.

We build our leadership capability using a multi-step approach to succession planning for our most critical roles, including CEO, executive, and technology leadership positions. Our executive organizationalsuccession planning process is a carefully designed, thoughtful, and long-term approach overseen by the HRCC and the Board. With the guidance of the HRCC, the Board also maintains a CEO emergency succession plan. We plan, and prepare as many years in advance as possible, for anticipated transitions to ensure leadership continuity and positive outcomes for the Company. Another key component of succession planning is leadership assessment and development as well as human capital management programs. of potential successors, including moving leaders into new, increasingly complex roles that complement their professional development. In addition, diversity of our succession pipelines is a priority of our Board and the Company, and we strive to ensure a diverse succession slate.

Management updates the HRCC on programs andexecutive leadership developments every quarterquarterly and reports to the full Board at leaston succession planning annually.

The HRCC reviewsregularly discusses and advises on management’sreports to the Board with respect to succession and development programs for the CEO and other senior executives, with an eye toward ensuring development of the talent needed to lead Applied today and in the future and readiness of succession candidates who can assume top management positions without undue interruption. Board members have opportunities throughout the year to engage

with members of senior management and other high-potential leaders in a variety of formal and informal settings, including Board meetings and events, preparatory meetings, analyst meetings, and internal and external business and technology conferences.

The HRCC and Board also regularly discuss matters related to organizational health and discuss individual executive transitions as the need arises over the course of the year. The Board’s goal is to have a long-term and continuing process for effective senior leadership capability, development, and succession, and to ensure that there are readyreadily available choices available when the time is right. The HRCC also receives quarterly reports from the Group Vice President of Human Resources, covering a range of topics relating to corporate culture and human capital management, including the

Company’s diversity and inclusion practices and initiatives and its sexual harassment policies.

Shareholder Rights

In addition to direct engagement through our recurring shareholder engagement program discussed below, Applied haswe have instituted a number of mechanisms that allow shareholders to advance their points of view, including:

Right to Call a Special Meeting. Our Bylaws permit shareholders holding at least 20% of our outstanding shares of common stock to call a special meeting.

Right to Act by Written Consent. Our Certificate of Incorporation permits shareholders holding at least 20% of our outstanding shares of common stock to initiate the process for shareholders to take action by written consent without a meeting.

Proxy Access. Our Bylaws permit proxy access. Any shareholder (or group of up to 20 shareholders) owning 3% or more of Applied’s common stock continuously for at least three years may nominate up to two individuals or 20% of our Board, whichever is greater, as director candidates for election to the Board, and require us to include such nominees in our annual meeting proxy statement if the shareholders and nominees satisfy the requirements contained in our Bylaws.statement.

Majority Voting. Under our Bylaws, in any uncontested election of directors (an election in which the number of nominees does not exceed the number of directors to be elected), any nominee who receives a greater number of votes cast “for” his or hertheir election than votes cast “against” his or hertheir election will be elected.

Our Bylaws provide that in the event an incumbent director receives more “against” than “for” votes, he or shethey shall tender his or hertheir resignation after certification of the shareholder vote. Our Governance Committee, composed entirely of independent directors, will consider the offer of resignation, taking into consideration all factors it deems relevant, and recommend to the Board the action to be taken. The Board must take action on the recommendation within 90 days following certification of the shareholder vote. No director who tenders an offer of resignation may participate in the vote on the Governance Committee’s recommendation or the Board’s determination of whether to accept the resignation offer. Applied will publicly disclose the Board’s decision, including, if applicable, the reasons for rejecting an offer to resign.

Right to Act by Written Consent. Currently our Certificate of Incorporation prohibits shareholder action by written consent. However, after consideration of the results of last year’s shareholder proposal on shareholder action by written consent and the shareholder feedback we received, we are submitting to shareholders for approval an amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to allow shareholder action by written consent. See “Proposal 4—Approval of an Amendment and Restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to Allow Shareholders to Act by Written Consent” on page 50 for additional information.

 

 

12    2020 Proxy Statement

Applied Materials, Inc.    13


BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

 

Shareholder Engagement

We believe that strong corporate governance should include regular engagement with our shareholders to enable us to understand and respond to shareholder concerns.

Investor Relations. Our senior management team, including our CEO, CFO, and members of our Investor Relations team, maintain regular contact with a broad base of investors, including through quarterly earnings calls, individual meetings, and other channels for communication, to understand their concerns. In 2019,2021, senior management participated in over

286participated in 100 meetings with investors, including more than 12194 meetings with theour CFO and more than 24 with our CEO.

Shareholder Outreach Program. In addition, we have a robust shareholder outreach program, which is a recurring, year-round effort, led by a cross-functional team that includes members of our Investor Relations, Global Rewards, Culture of Inclusion, Environmental, Health & SafetyESG, and Legal functions, with participation of our independent directors, where appropriate. This engagement enables us to build meaningful relationships and trust over time with our shareholders.

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

FEBRUARY - MARCH - MAY Annual Meeting Based on the resultsAhead of our 2019 annual meeting, the Boardconduct engagement with investors that have expressed any concerns or questions over ballot items and management developed a plan to solicit feedback on written consentproxy statement DECEMBER - FEBRUARY Board Deliberations Based on Feedback ContinuedJANUARY Continue to meet with shareholders enhancedand proxy advisors, enhance proxy statement and annual report content based on feedback, and respondedrespond to shareholder concerns JUNEAPRIL - AUGUST Action by Written Consent Focused Engagement Conducted extensive written consent engagement outreach. We reached out to holdersReview and summarize feedback from annual meeting, identify potential areas of 57% of outstanding sharesconcern, track governance trends, and engaged with 46% specifically on written consentfinalize Sustainability Report SEPTEMBER - NOVEMBER General Off-Season Engagement ConductedConduct general off-season engagement outreach. We reached out to holders of 62% of outstanding sharesoutreach with shareholders and engaged with 20% of holders on ESG issuesproxy advisors Year-Round Engagement

Key Themes Discussed with Shareholders in 2019

  Corporate GovernanceGovernance structure, including current shareholder rights, and desirability of action by written consent
Input regarding potential adoption of action by written consent, market practice provisions in our corporate charter and bylaws and industry trends

  Board Refreshment and

  Composition

Applied’s commitment to Board diversity, including gender, race/ethnicity and age
Thoughtful Board processes for refreshment, succession planning and director orientation and education
  Risk OversightFramework for the Board’s oversight of risk, particularly around human capital management, culture and sustainability
  Executive Compensation  Compensation program, metrics, and link between pay and performance
  SustainabilityShareholders’ particular ESG focus areas and Applied’s strategy, initiatives and Board oversight related to ESG matters
Alignment of sustainability initiatives with corporate strategy; Applied’s commitment to diversity and inclusion

 

We engage with a significant cross-section of our shareholder base, including large institutional investors, pension funds, and other investors. Topics of discussion include key business, Board, governance, executive compensation, environmental, sustainability, and diversity and inclusion matters, as well as other subjects of interest to our shareholders. Based on feedback from shareholders, we

have over the last few years adopted proxy access, and a special meeting right, and the right for shareholders to act by written consent, and implemented changes to our executive compensation programs.

During the fall of 2019,our off-season outreach in 2021, we contacted the holders of approximately 62%53% of our outstanding shares, and engaged in active discussions on these topics with investors who requested meetings, representing approximately 20%36% of our shares outstanding. Of these meetings, our Board Chair participated in discussions with investors representing approximately 19% of our shares outstanding. In direct response to the shareholder feedback we received in 2021, we are including a skills matrix and enhancing disclosures regarding Board diversity and the Value Creation Awards in this Proxy Statement.

 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    13

Key Themes Discussed with Shareholders in 2021

  ESG

Shareholders’ particular ESG focus areas and Applied’s strategy, initiatives, and Board oversight related to ESG matters
Alignment of sustainability initiatives with corporate strategy; Applied’s commitment to diversity and inclusion
  Executive Compensation  Compensation program, recent actions, metrics, ESG considerations, and link between pay and performance

  Board Refreshment and

  Composition

Applied’s commitment to Board diversity, including with respect to gender and race/ethnicity
Thoughtful Board processes for refreshment, succession planning, and tenure
  Corporate GovernanceGovernance practices, including Board leadership structure and shareholder rights

14    2022 Proxy Statement


Responsiveness to2019 Shareholder Action by Written Consent Proposal. In response to the high level of shareholder support at the 2019 Annual Meeting for the proposal on shareholder action by written consent, and at the direction of our Governance Committee, we reached out to shareholders for their views on shareholder action by written consent, as well as our existing special meeting process. We contacted the holders of approximately 57% of our outstanding shares. Our independent Chairman of the Board and our independent Chair of the Governance Committee participated in the discussions with several of our shareholders. Feedback received from the shareholders was shared and discussed with the Board.BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

After careful consideration of the results of the 2019 shareholder action by written consent proposal and the shareholder feedback, as well as a comprehensive review of market practices and provisions adopted by other companies with respect to a shareholder right to act by written consent, the Board is submitting for shareholder approval an amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to allow shareholder action by written consent, as further described in “Proposal 4—Approval of an Amendment and Restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to Allow Shareholders to Act by Written Consent” on page 50.

Disclosure of Diversity Data.In September 2018, we disclosed key diversity data for the first time, including the gender and ethnic composition of our workforce, as well as new goals for increasing our global diversity and ensuring we have an inclusive work environment, which include increasing women and underrepresented minorities in our workforce. The disclosures not only reflect the importance of this issue to Applied, but also the input that we received from our shareholders. Shareholder feedback to the information was universally positive, with the view that it demonstrated our commitment to diversity and inclusion, transparency in disclosing data and accountability in working towards our goals.

In 2019, we provided an update of the diversity data published the previous year, as well as additional information regarding our engineering women employees in the U.S. and globally, to communicate the progress we are making towards our goals of increasing representation of women globally and underrepresented minorities in our U.S. workforce.

Shareholder Communications

Any shareholder wishing to communicate with any of our directors regarding Applied may write to the director, c/o Christina Y. Lai,Teri A. Little, Corporate Secretary, Applied Materials, Inc., 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1268, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95052, or bye-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com. The Board has instructed the Corporate Secretary reviewsto review correspondence directed to the Board and, at the Corporate Secretary’s discretion, forwardsforward items that she deems appropriate for the Board’s consideration. The independent directors of the Board review and approve the shareholder communication process periodically in order to enable an effective method by which shareholders can communicate with the Board.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

The Board has adopted stock ownership guidelines to align the interests of our directors and executive officers with those of our shareholders. The guidelines provide thatnon-employee directors should each own Applied stock with a value of at least five times the annual base retainer fornon-employee directors. Applied’s Chief Executive Officer should own Applied stock with a value of at least six times his

annual base salary. Each Section 16 officer on the CEO Executive Staff should own Applied stock with a value of at least three times his or hertheir annual base salary. Unearned performance awards and unexercised options (or portions thereof) are not included for purposes of satisfying the guidelines. Directors and officers may not sell any shares of Applied stock if their ownership would fall below the applicable guideline following the sale. As of December  31, 2019,2021, all of our directors and executive officers were in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.

Standards of Business Conduct

Applied’s Standards of Business Conduct embody our commitment to ethical and legal business practices. The Board expects Applied’s directors, officers, and all other members of its workforce to act ethically at all times and to acknowledge their commitment to Applied’s Standards of Business Conduct. The Standards of Business Conduct are available on our website at:http://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/investor-relations/governance-documents.

 

 

Board Meetings and Committees

 

 

The Board met fivesix times in fiscal 2019.2021. Each director attended over 75% of all Board and applicable committee meetings held during fiscal 2019.2021. Directors are strongly encouraged to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders, and all of the directors serving on our Board at the time, except for Dr. Chen, attended our 2019virtual 2021 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

The Board has three principal committees performing the functions required by applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards to be performed by independent directors: the Audit Committee, the Human Resources and Compensation Committee, and the Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee. Each of these committees meets regularly and

14    2020 Proxy Statement


BOARD AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES

has a written charter approved by the Board that is reviewed annually by the respective committee and by the Board. The

Board also has a Strategy Committee and an Investment Committee, whose rolesrole and responsibilities are described in Applied’s Corporate Governance GuidelinesGuidelines.

In addition, atAt each regularly-scheduledregularly scheduled Board meeting, the Chair of each committee reports on any significant matters addressed by the committee since the last Board meeting. Each director who serves on the Audit Committee, Human Resources and Compensation Committee, or Corporate

Governance and Nominating Committee is an independent director under applicable Nasdaq listing standards and SEC rules.

Copies of the current charters for the Audit, Human Resources and Compensation, and Corporate Governance and Nominating Committees can be found on our website at:http://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/investor-relations/governance-documents. The roles and responsibilities of the Strategy Committee and the Investment Committee are described in Applied’s Corporate Governance Guidelines.governance-documents.

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    15


 

 Audit Committee

 

Members:

 

Dennis D. Powell,Judy Bruner, Chair*

Judy Bruner*

Stephen R. Forrest

Adrianna C. Ma*

Yvonne McGill*+

ScottA. McGregor*

 

Primary responsibilities:

 

  Oversee financial statements, internal control over financial reporting and auditing, accounting, and financial reporting processes

  Oversee the qualifications, independence, performance, and engagement of our independent registered public accounting firm

  Oversee disclosure controls and procedures, and internal audit function

  Review andpre-approve audit and permissiblenon-audit services and fees

  Oversee tax, legal, regulatory, and ethical compliance

  Review and approve related-person transactions

  Oversee financial-related risks, enterprise risk management program, and cybersecurity

  Oversee matters related to Environmental Health and Safety

  Meetings in
Fiscal 2019:2021: 1112

*  Audit Committee Financial Expert

+   Appointed to Committee in July 2019

   

 

 Human Resources and Compensation Committee

 

Members:

 

Thomas J. Iannotti, Chair

Xun (Eric) Chen

Alexander A. Karsner

 

Primary responsibilities:

 

  Oversee human resources, programs, compensation and employee benefits programs, policies, and plans

  Review and advise on management succession planning and executive organizational development

  Determine compensation policies for executive officers and employees

  Review the performance, and determine the compensation, of executive officers

  Approve and oversee equity-related incentive plans and executive bonus plans

  Review compensation policies and practices as they relate to risk management practices

  Approve the compensation program for Board members

  Oversee human capital management, including the Company’s culture and diversity and inclusion programs and initiatives

  Meetings in
Fiscal 2019:2021: 5

 

 Corporate Governance and Nominating Committee

 

Members:

 

Judy Bruner, Chair

Alexander A. Karsner

Adrianna C. Ma

Dennis D. PowellYvonne McGill

 

Primary responsibilities:

 

  Oversee the composition, structure, and evaluation of the Board and its committees

  Identify and recommend qualified candidates for election to the Board

  Establish procedures for director candidate nomination and evaluation

  Oversee corporate governance policies and practices, including Corporate Governance Guidelines

  Review and approve director service on the board of directors of other companies and oversee director education

  Review shareholder proposals and recommend to the Board actions to be taken in response to each proposal

  Review strategy, policies, performance, and reporting related to the Company’s management of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) issues not delegated to other committees

  Review conflict of interest matters for the Board

  Meetings in
Fiscal 2019:2021: 45

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    15

16    2022 Proxy Statement


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Compensation Program for Directors

 

 

We compensate ournon-employee directors for their service on the Board with a combination of cash and equity awards. Directors who are employees of Applied do not receive any compensation for their service as directors.

Retainer and Meeting Fees

Eachnon-employee director receives an annual cash retainer for his or hertheir service on the Board, as well as additional cash retainers if he or she servesthey serve as the ChairmanChair of the Board, onas a member of a committee, or as the chair of a committee. Annual retainers are paid quarterly and are prorated based on the director’s service during the fiscal year. The following table sets forth cash compensation fornon-employee directors in effect during fiscal 2019.2021.

 

Annual Base Retainer (prorated and paid quarterly)

  $70,000   $80,000 
Additional Annual Retainers for Committee Service (prorated and paid quarterly):   

 

   

 

Audit Committee

  $25,000   $25,000 

Human Resources and Compensation

Committee

  $12,500   $12,500 

Corporate Governance and Nominating

Committee

  $10,000   $10,000 

Strategy Committee

  $10,000 

Strategy and Investment Committee

  $10,000 

Additional Annual Retainers for Chairman and

Committee Chairs (prorated and paid quarterly):

   

 

Additional Annual Retainers for Chair and

Committee Chairs (prorated and paid quarterly):

   

 

Chairman of the Board

  $150,000 

Chair of the Board

  $150,000 

Audit Committee Chair

  $25,000   $25,000 

Human Resources and Compensation

Committee Chair

  $20,000   $20,000 

Corporate Governance and Nominating

Committee Chair

  $12,500   $12,500 

Strategy Committee Chair

  $12,500 

Strategy and Investment Committee Chair

  $12,500 

Chair of the Transactions Subcommittee of the Strategy and Investment Committee

  $7,500 

In addition,non-employee directors receive $2,000 per meeting for service on the Transactions Subcommittee of the Strategy and Investment Committee or otherad-hoc committee of which they are a member, or $3,000 per meeting if they are the chair of such a committee.Committee. Non-employee directors are reimbursed for travel and other reasonableout-of-pocket expenses related to attendance at Board and committee meetings, business events on behalf of Applied, and seminars and programs on subjects related to their Board responsibilities.

Equity Compensation

Initial Grant. Upon initial appointment (by the Board) or election (by the shareholders) to the Board other than at an annual meeting of shareholders, anon-employee director receives anon-discretionary grant of restricted stock units with respect to a number of shares of Applied common stock with a fair market value on the date of grant equal to $225,000 (rounded down to the nearest whole share),pro-rated based on the period starting on the day of initial appointment or election and ending on the day of the next scheduled annual meeting of shareholders.

Annual Grant. Eachnon-employee director elected at an annual meeting receives on that date anon-discretionary grant of restricted stock units with respect to a number of shares of Applied common stock with a fair market value on the date of grant equal to $225,000 (rounded down to the nearest whole share). Anon-employee director who is initially appointed or elected to the Board on the day of an annual meeting of shareholders receives only an annual grant. Each of ournon-employee directorsre-elected at the 20192021 Annual Meeting received a grant of 5,9881,919 restricted stock units on that date.

Vesting.Grants made to ournon-employee directors vest in full on the earlier of March 1 of the year following the date of grant or the date of the next annual meeting, provided thenon-employee director remains on the Board through the scheduled vesting date. Vesting of these grants will beis accelerated in full upon anon-employee director’s earlier termination of service on the Board due to disability or death, or upon a change of control of Applied if the director ceases to be anon-employee director (and does not become a member of the board of directors of any successor corporation or its parent).Non-employee directors may elect in advance to defer receipt of vested shares until their termination of service on the Board.

Limit on Awards.Under our amended and restated Employee Stock Incentive Plan, grants of equity awards to any individualnon-employee director may not exceed a fair market value totaling more than $400,000 in any fiscal year.

Charitable Matching Contributions

Non-employee directors are eligible to participate in The Applied Materials Foundation Matching Gift Program, under which theThe Applied Materials Foundation annually will match up to $3,000 of anon-employee director’s donations during fiscal

Applied Materials, Inc.    17


2021 to eligiblenon-profit and educational organizations, as well asand will match an unlimited amount of donations to our annual food drive. In addition,

16    2020 Proxy Statement


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

non-employee directors are eligible to participate in a matching program under the Applied Materials, Inc. Political Action Committee, under which the Company annually will match up to $2,500 of anon-employee

director’s contributions for the benefit of eligiblenon-profit organizations

and kindergarten to 12th grade public andnon-profit private schools in the U.S.Non-employee directors are subject to the same These maximum matching amounts and other terms are the same as those forthat apply to Applied’s employees.

 

 

Director Compensation for Fiscal 20192021

 

 

Name    Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)
     Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2)
     All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
     Total
($)
     Fees Earned
or Paid in
Cash
($)
     Stock
Awards
($)(1)(2)
     All Other
Compensation
($)(3)
     Total
($)
 

Rani Borkar

     78,750      276,153      —        354,903 

Judy Bruner

     117,500      220,119      6,500      344,119      152,500      223,141      4,000      379,641 

Xun (Eric) Chen

     92,500      220,119      —        312,619      102,500      223,141      —        325,641 

Aart J. de Geus

     104,500      220,119      —        324,619      90,000      223,141      —        313,141 

Stephen R. Forrest

     117,000      220,119      750      337,869 

Thomas J. Iannotti

     252,500      220,119      4,000      476,619      262,500      223,141      3,500      489,141 

Alexander A. Karsner

     92,500      220,119      —        312,619      102,500      223,141      —        325,641 

Adrianna C. Ma

     123,000      220,119      2,000      345,119      122,500      223,141      4,000      349,641 

Yvonne McGill(4)

     25,577      142,201      —        167,778      115,000      223,141      2,500      340,641 

Scott A. McGregor

     105,000      220,119      6,000     331,119      127,500      223,141      —        350,641 

Dennis D. Powell

     140,000      220,119      —        360,119 

Stephen R. Forrest(4)

     40,756      —        180,212      220,968 

(1)

Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the directors. Instead, these amounts represent the grant date fair value of stock awards granted in fiscal 20192021 (consisting of 5,9881,919 restricted stock units granted to each director on March 7, 201911, 2021 and 2,831an additional 599 restricted stock units granted to Ms. McGillBorkar on July 22, 2019December 14, 2020 upon her initial appointment to the Board), as determined pursuant to FASB Accounting Standards Codification 718 (“ASC 718”). The assumptions used to calculate the value of stock awards are set forth in Note 1214 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Applied’s Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 20192021 filed with the SEC on December 13, 2019.17, 2021.

(2)

Each director other than Ms. McGill had 5,9881,919 restricted stock units outstanding at the end of fiscal 2019 and Ms. McGill had 2,831 restricted stock units outstanding at the end of fiscal 2019.2021. In addition, certain directors had restricted stock units that had vested in previous years and for which settlement was deferred until the date of his or hertheir termination of service from the Board, as follows: Dr. Chen, 14,28619,599 units; and Ms. Ma, 20,416 units; and Mr. Powell, 58,87031,910 units. Dr. Forrest had 743 restricted stock units outstanding at the end of fiscal 2021 (see footnote 4 for additional information about these restricted stock units).

(3)

AmountAmounts shown representsrepresent The Applied Materials Foundation’s and/or the Company’s matching contribution of the director’s donations/contributions to eligiblenon-profit organizations.organizations, except with respect to Dr. Forrest.

(4)(4) 

Ms. McGill was appointed toDr. Forrest’s term of office expired upon the election of directors at the 2021 annual meeting of shareholders on March 11, 2021 and so he did not receive a stock award in fiscal 2021 for his service as a director. Dr. Forrest is a member of Applied’s Growth Technical Advisory Board (“GTAB”), and he received a retainer of $79,167 and a grant of 743 restricted stock units in July 2019.fiscal 2021 for his service as a member of the GTAB.

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    17

18    2022 Proxy Statement


STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Principal Shareholders

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2019 by each person known by Applied to own 5% or more of our common stock. In general, “beneficial ownership” refers to shares that an entity or individual had the power to vote or the power to dispose of, and shares that such entity or individual had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2019.

  Shares Beneficially Owned 
 Name     Number      Percent(1) 

 The Vanguard Group
 100 Vanguard Blvd.
 Malvern, PA 19355

  75,042,977(2)   8.20

 BlackRock, Inc.
 55 East 52nd Street
 New York, NY 10055

  66,433,313(3)   7.26

 State Street Corporation
 One Lincoln Street
 Boston, MA 02111

  47,947,194(4)   5.24

(1)

Percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group by 915,455,190 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019.

(2)

The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) on February 11, 2019 indicates that as of December 31, 2018, Vanguard had sole dispositive power over 73,625,049 shares, shared dispositive power over 1,417,928 shares, sole voting power over 1,213,882 shares, and shared voting power over 227,790 shares.

(3)

The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) on February 4, 2019 indicates that as of December 31, 2018, BlackRock had sole dispositive power over 66,433,313 shares and sole voting power over 55,582,185 shares.

(4)

The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by State Street Corporation (“State Street”) on February 13, 2019 indicates that as of December 31, 2018, State Street had shared dispositive power over 44,618,743 shares and shared voting power over 43,477,113 shares.

18    2020 Proxy Statement


STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

STOCK OWNERSHIP INFORMATION

Principal Shareholders

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2021 by each person known by Applied to own 5% or more of our common stock. In general, “beneficial ownership” refers to shares that an entity or individual had the power to vote or the power to dispose of, and shares that such entity or individual had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2021.

  Shares Beneficially Owned 
 Name     Number      Percent(1) 

 BlackRock, Inc.
 55 East 52nd Street
 New York, NY 10055

  76,304,024(2)   8.61

 The Vanguard Group
 100 Vanguard Blvd.
 Malvern, PA 19355

  72,982,078(3)   8.23

 T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc.
 100 E. Pratt Street
 Baltimore, MD 21202

  46,137,348(4)   5.20

(1)

Percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group by 886,732,275 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2021.

(2)

The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by BlackRock, Inc. (“BlackRock”) on January 29, 2021 indicates that as of December 31, 2020, BlackRock had sole dispositive power over 76,304,024 shares and sole voting power over 66,391,855 shares.

(3)

The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by The Vanguard Group (“Vanguard”) on February 10, 2021 indicates that as of December 31, 2020, Vanguard had sole dispositive power over 68,899,529 shares, shared dispositive power over 4,082,549 shares and shared voting power over 1,583,129 shares.

(4)

The amended Schedule 13G filed with the SEC by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. (“T. Rowe”) on February 16, 2021, indicates that as December 31, 2020, T. Rowe had sole dispositive power over 46,137,348 shares and sole voting power over 19,179,081 shares.

Applied Materials, Inc.    19


 

Directors and Executive Officers

 

The following table shows the number of shares of our common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 20192021 by: (1) each director and director nominee, (2) each NEOnamed executive officer and (3) the current directors and executive officers as a group. In general, “beneficial ownership” refers to shares that a director or executive officer had the power to vote or the power to dispose of, and shares that such individual had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2019.2021.

 

    Shares Beneficially Owned 
Name  Number(1)      Percent(2) 

Directors, not including the CEO:

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Rani Borkar

2,518(3)*

Judy Bruner

   14,56627,460(3)  * 

Xun (Eric) Chen

   24,57837,727(3)(4)   * 

Aart J. de Geus

   141,467104,361*

Stephen R. Forrest

66,967(3)  * 

Thomas J. Iannotti

   59,97055,864(3)  * 

Alexander A. Karsner

   20,0279,427(3)  * 

Adrianna C. Ma

   23,19936,530(4)(5)   * 

Yvonne McGill

   1639,900(3)  * 

Scott A. McGregor

   4,261*

Dennis D. Powell

64,25917,155(5)(3)   * 

Named Executive Officers:

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gary E. Dickerson

   1,564,5681,074,838   * 

DanielRobert J. DurnHalliday

   109,69698,104(6)  * 

Ali SalehpourDaniel J. Durn(6)

   322,68938,472   * 

Prabu G. Raja

   241,635283,793   * 

Steve G. GhanayemAli Salehpour

   283,882430,002*

Omkaram Nalamasu

119,669   * 

Current Directors and Executive Officers, as a Group (19(17 persons)

   3,749,5382,630,904(7)   * 
*

Less than 1%

(1)

Except as subject to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all of their shares of common stock.

(2)

Percentage ownership is calculated by dividing the number of shares beneficially owned by such person or group by the sum of 915,455,190886,732,275 shares of common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2019,2021, plus the number of shares of common stock that such person or group had the right to acquire within 60 days after December 31, 2019.2021.

(3)

Includes 14,4671,919 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 2021.

(4)

Includes (a) 19,709 restricted stock units that have vested and which, pursuant to Dr. Chen’s election to defer, will be converted to shares of Applied common stock and paid to him on the date of his termination of service from the Applied Board and (b) 1,919 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 2021 and which, pursuant to Dr. Chen’s election to defer, will be converted to shares of Applied common stock and paid to him on the date of his termination of service from the Applied Board.

(4)(5) 

Includes 20,681(a) 32,093 restricted stock units that have vested and which, pursuant to Ms. Ma’s election to defer, will be converted to shares of Applied common stock and paid to her on the date of her termination of service from the Applied Board.

(5)

Includes 59,670Board and (b) 1,919 restricted stock units that have vestedare scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 2021 and which, pursuant to Mr. Powell’sMs. Ma’s election to defer, will be converted to shares of Applied common stock and paid to himher on the date of hisher termination of service from the Applied Board.

(6)

Mr. Durn voluntarily terminated his employment with Applied effective October 15, 2021.

(7)

Includes 18,630(a) 17,271 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 2019.

(7)

Includes (a) 32,375 restricted stock units that are scheduled to vest within 60 days after December 31, 20192021 and (b) 94,81851,802 restricted stock units that have vested and which, pursuant to each director’s election to defer, will be converted to shares of Applied common stock and paid to the director on the date of the director’s termination of service from the Applied Board.

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    19

20    2022 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 2—APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

PROPOSAL 2—APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

 

Pursuant to Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”), we are asking shareholders to approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation of our NEOs, as described in this Proxy Statement. We seek this approval each year. Our annual“say-on-pay” proposals have been supported by our shareholders each year since we began providing this vote in 2011, and received the support of 96%87% of votes cast in 2019.2021.

Our Board of Directors believes that our compensation policies and practices promote a performance-based culture and align our executives’ interests with those of our shareholders through a strong emphasis onat-risk compensation tied to the achievement of performance objectives and shareholder value. Our executive compensation program is also designed to attract and retain highly-talented executives who are critical to the successful implementation of Applied’s strategic plan.

Pay and Performance. We align compensation with our business objectives, performance, and shareholder interests. See pages 2628 and 3537 for charts illustrating the connection between key financial and Company performance metrics and the compensation paid to our CEO during the last five fiscal years.

Significant Portion of CEO Pay Consists of Variable Compensation and Long-Term Incentives. In fiscal 2019, 92%2021, 95% of our CEO’s compensation comprised variable compensation elements, and 84% of his overall compensation

compensation was delivered in equity with multi-year vesting. Performance objectives include financial and market objectives relating to adjusted operating margin, relative TSR, adjusted gross margin WFEand wafer fabrication equipment market share, and relative TSR, as well as other strategic and operational objectives, as described on pages 3234 and 33.35.

Please see the“Compensation “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section for further discussion of our executive compensation program and the fiscal 20192021 compensation of our NEOs.

We are asking our shareholders to approve the compensation of our NEOs as described in this Proxy Statement by voting in favor of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on anon-binding, advisory basis, the compensation paid to the Company’s named executive officers as disclosed in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders pursuant to Item 402 of RegulationS-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section, the Summary Compensation Table, other compensation tables, narrative discussion and related disclosure.”

Even though thissay-on-pay vote is advisory and therefore will not be binding on the Company, the HRCC and the Board value the opinions of our shareholders, and will consider the results of the vote when making future compensation decisions for our NEOs.

 

 

 ✓ 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 2019,2021, AS DISCLOSED IN THIS PROXY STATEMENT

 

 

20    2020 Proxy Statement

Applied Materials, Inc.    21


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Executive Summary

 

Our Business and Strategy

Applied Materials is the leader in the materials engineering solutions used to produce virtually every new chip and advanced display in the world. Our expertise in modifying materials at atomic levels and on an industrial scale enables customers to transform possibilities into reality. At Applied Materials, our innovations make possible the technology shaping the future.Make Possible® a Better Future.

We develop, design, produce and service semiconductor and display equipment for manufacturers that sell into highly competitive and rapidly changing end markets. Our competitive positioning is driven by the ability of our abilitytalented workforce to identify major technology inflections early, and to develop highly differentiated materials engineering solutions for our customers to enable those technology inflections. Through our broad portfolio of products, technologies and technologies,services, innovation leadership and focused investments in research and development, we are enabling our customers’ success and creating significant value for our shareholders. Applied’s ability to hire, develop and retain a world-class global workforce is based on our commitment to creating a Culture of Inclusion that embraces different backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences to build stronger, more resilient teams. Consistent with our core values, we enable our employees to do their best work by providing quality training and learning opportunities; promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion; and upholding a high standard of ethics and respect for human rights.

In addition to our other accomplishments, we’ve made significant progress towards our 10-year road map for environmental and social responsibility. At Applied, making a positive contribution is at the foundation of our culture and our vision to Make Possible® a Better Future. Our 1x, 100x and 10,000x sustainability framework refers to the holistic goals and commitments we’ve set for our operations, how we work with customers and suppliers, and how our technology can be used to advance sustainability on a global scale. More details of Applied’s ESG vision and strategy, including a copy of the Company’s most recent Sustainability Report, can be found at https://www.appliedmaterials.com/company/corporate-responsibility.

Our Performance Highlights

Over the past several years, our broad portfolio of products and services has made Applied a more resilient company that can perform well in a variety of conditions.market environments. In 2019,2021, we delivered solidthe best financial performance against very aggressive targets in Applied Materials’ history while navigating a dynamic and challenging market environment that was affectedimpacted by down cycles in both memory and display equipment spending.the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Key highlights include:

 

  

RevenueRecord revenue of $14.6$23.1 billion, with year-over-year increases of 62% in overall orders, 78% in Semiconductor Systems orders, and 77% in year-end backlog at a company level – to $11.8 billion;

 

  

Operating profitRecord operating income of $3.4$6.9 billion, resulting in GAAP EPS of $2.86,$6.40, and record non-GAAP adjusted operating income of $7.3 billion, resulting in non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $3.04$6.84 (see Appendix A for a reconciliation ofnon-GAAP adjusted measures); and

 

  

DeliveredRecord operating cash flow of $3.2$5.4 billion, equal to 22%23.6% of revenue; andrevenue.

 

22    2022 Proxy Statement  

Returned $3.2 billion to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases.


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Highlights of five-year performance achievements across key financial measures

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Revenue Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Margin Non-GAAP Adjusted EPS +57% $14.7B FY2017 $23.1B FY2021 +3.7 PTS 28.0% FY2017 31.7% FY2021 +105% $3.33 FY2017 $6.84 FY2021

Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin andnon-GAAP adjusted EPS are performance targets under our bonuslong-term incentive and long-term incentivebonus plans. See Appendix A fornon-GAAP reconciliations.



Applied Materials, Inc.    21


Key financial highlights for our reporting segments in fiscal 20192021 include the following:

 

  

Semiconductor Systems segment: we delivered record annual revenue of $9.0$16.3 billion in an environment that included a significant correction in memory spending.increase of 43% year-over-year.

 

  

Applied Global Services segment: we grew revenue to a record $3.9$5.0 billion – an increase of 21% year-over-year, and continued to increaseincreased the number of installed base tools covered by long-term service agreements – providing a recurring revenue stream – by approximately 30% since 2017.

For the calendar year 2019, we expect12%, to outperform both the WFE market and our process equipment peers.nearly 15,000.

 

  

Display and Adjacent Markets segment: we delivered revenue of $1.7$1.6 billion and maintained profitability during an industry down cycle.

Strategic and Operational Highlights

Applied’s strategy is to deliver highly differentiated materials engineering products and services that enable major technology inflections and drive our customers’ success.

 

LOGOLOGO

See inflections early Identify customerscustomers' High Value Problems Develop Differentiated Valuable Sustainable products Ensure customer success + Generate residual value

We believeThe digital transformation of the electronics industry isglobal economy accelerated in a period of transition as major new growth drivers emergefiscal 2021, making semiconductors more strategically important to the world than in the form ofany time in history. Long-term megatrends including the Internet of Things (IoT), big data and artificial intelligence (AI). In fiscal 2019, we continued are fueling increased demand for semiconductors and driving the need for next-generation silicon technologies. Applied Materials has focused its strategy and investments to focus on initiativesdeliver innovations that will help accelerate our customers’ roadmaps and put Appliedimprovements in the best position for the future.power, performance, area, cost, and time-to-market (PPACt) of next-generation semiconductor devices. Key highlightsstrategic and operational accomplishments during fiscal 2021 include:

Our epi and thermal revenues each grew 70% and CMP revenue grew more than 60%.

 

  

We continued to prioritizeexpand our operating expenses towards R&Doffering of Integrated Materials Solutions, which are highly differentiated products that combine multiple process technologies with onboard metrology and sensors within a single system to solve major technology challengesenable unique films, structures, and devices. Our latest IMS system enables a 50% reduction in interconnect resistance at the most advanced foundry-logic nodes and creates a multibillion-dollar opportunity for Applied Materials over the next five years.

Applied Materials, Inc.    23


We launched our innovative AIx (Actionable Insight Accelerator) platform that brings together process tools, sensors, metrology with data analytics and machine learning to accelerate the discovery, development, and commercial deployment of new chip technologies for our customers and drive our long-term growth strategy.customers.

 

  

In addition to advancements in our traditional unit process equipment, we introduced new Integrated Materials Solutions – a new categoryservices business, the tenure of products that combine multiple process steps in a single system to help customers create new types of semiconductor structures and devices.

We strengthened our capabilities to address the growing number of applications within the IoT, communications, automotive, power and sensor markets.

We grew our installed base of semiconductor and display equipment by approximately 2,000 systems to now total nearly 43,000. Also, the number of tools we have under long-term service agreements (which generate subscription-style revenue) has grown from 1.9 years at the end of 2020 to 2.3 years at the end of 2021, and our renewal rate for long-term service agreements increased byto approximately 30% since 2017.90%.

 

  

We expandedcontinued to make substantial progress towards our R&D capabilities by opening the Materials Engineering Technology Accelerator (META Center), astate-of-the-art10-year facility aimed at speeding customer prototyping of new materials, process technologiesroadmap for environmental and devices. The META Center extends Applied’s ability to collaborate with customers to pioneer new ways of improving chip performance, power and cost.social responsibility, as described in more detail on page xii.

Total Shareholder Return Performance

In fiscal 2021, our total shareholder return performance reflected increased demand for semiconductors and wafer fab equipment driven by the digital transformation of the global economy. As shown below, Applied has substantially outperformed the S&P 500 Index and our peer group over the past five years, reflecting the company’s ability to create unique and innovative materials engineering solutions that accelerate its customers’ technology roadmaps. In addition, from the close of market on the last trading day of fiscal 2021 through the close of market on December 31, 2021, Applied’s stock price increased by approximately 15%.

Fiscal 2017 – Fiscal 2021 Total Shareholder Return vs. S&P 500 and Proxy Peers1

LOGO

450% 400% 350% 300% 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 402% 231% 138% AMAT FY21 Proxy Peers S&P 500

1 Reflects results from October 31, 2016 through October 29, 2021, sourced from S&P Capital IQ. Proxy peer data reflects companies set forth on page 31, weighted by market capitalization.

Key Compensation Actions

Performance-Based Compensation Decisions.The HRCC approved an aggressive set of scorecard targetsperformance goals for the executive officers for fiscal 2019,2021, including financial targets above any levels that Applied had achieved in the past, as well as equally challenging operational targets. AlthoughNo adjustments were made during the aggressive targets resultedyear to the performance goals or to the Company’s results in below-target bonus payments, the Company expects to see market share growth for calendar year 2019 and also made significant progress on long-term growth initiatives.

determining incentive payouts. During fiscal 2019,2021, Applied delivered solidexceptional financial and operational performanceresults in a challenging environment and made meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals that areremain focused on enabling strong longer-term revenue and EPS growth; however, the results were below aggressively set targets. Accordingly, bonus payouts to our executive officers were below target bonus amounts. growth.

As part of our multi-year incentive program, for the period of 2017 to 2019 through 2021, the HRCC approved aggressive goals fornon-GAAP adjusted operating margin and WFE market share.relative total shareholder return. The results for this three-year performance period were aboveexceeded target, resulting in above target levelabove-target vesting of performance share unit awards for our executive officers.



 

22    2020 Proxy Statement

24    2022 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Stock Price PerformanceValue Creation Awards.

In fiscal 2019, our stock price performance reflected steady market optimism, particularly As described in the second halfCompany’s 2021 proxy statement, in early fiscal 2021 the HRCC approved long-term value creation awards for Mr. Dickerson, Mr. Durn and Dr. Raja. The HRCC concluded that an incremental incentive opportunity would (i) strengthen the alignment of the year,officers’ interests with those of the Company’s shareholders, during a period when Applied can take advantage of significant value creation opportunities resulting from rapid changes in the technology industry, and (ii) help secure the benefit of the officers’ leadership in a highly competitive market for proven executive talent among technology companies, as underscored by Mr. Durn’s subsequent departure. As a result of a number of months of careful deliberation of award design, the semiconductor market environment showed early signs of strength in foundry and logic spending, and continued reduction in memory inventory levels. Over the past five years, Applied has outperformed the S&P 500 Index, as shown below. In addition, Applied outperformed peers by over 40% in fiscal 2019.

FY2015 – FY2019 Total Shareholder Return vs. Key Peersawards were structured to:

 

Be entirely performance-based, requiring the sustained achievement of absolute TSR hurdles to directly align the officers’ interests with those of our shareholders;

 

LOGO

Only deliver value at stock price levels that significantly exceed Applied’s then-all-time high stock price on the grant date; and

 

Cliff vest at the end of a five-year performance period – a substantially longer retention requirement than the annual long-term incentive awards.

Mr. Durn forfeited his award as a result of his departure. The HRCC does not expect to grant similar awards in the coming years. For additional information regarding the Value Creation Awards, please see page 39.

ESG Objective. We have added ESG objectives to the fiscal 2021 annual incentive plan, to measure and incentivize progress towards our long-term ESG goals. While the Company’s ESG goals are long-term in nature, the HRCC believes that it is important to annually assess progress towards those goals. As a result, the HRCC included ESG objectives in the annual incentive program, rather than in long-term incentive awards. For additional information regarding the annual incentive program, please see page 31. For additional information regarding the Company’s ESG goals and accomplishments, please see page xii.

Chief Financial Officer Transition. In October 2021, we announced the departure of our prior Chief Financial Officer, Daniel J. Durn, and the appointment of Robert J. Halliday as Applied’s interim CFO while the Company conducts a search for Mr. Durn’s successor. The structure of the compensation approved for Mr. Halliday, as detailed on page 42, reflects the anticipated limited-term nature of his appointment.



 

Applied Materials, Inc.    23

Applied Materials, Inc.    25


Primary Compensation Elements and Executive Compensation Highlights for Fiscal 20192021

The primary elements of our compensation program consist of base salary, annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive awards. Other elements of compensation include a 401(k) savings plan, deferred compensation benefits and other benefits programs that are generally available to all employees. Primary elements and highlights of our fiscal 20192021 compensation program for our NEOs (except for Mr. Halliday) were as follows:

 

    Element of Pay 

 Structure 

 Highlights
             
     

Base Salary

(see page 29)31)

 

Fixed cash compensation for expected day-to-day responsibilities

Reviewed annually and adjusted when

  

 

 

 

Fixed cash compensation for expectedday-to-day responsibilities

Fiscal 2019Prior to fiscal 2021, only minimal changes to base salaries for each named executive officer (“NEO”) increased from 2018 levels to reflect increases in competitive pay positioning levelsthe NEOs were made for multiple years

  
   

Reviewed annually and adjusted when appropriate, based on scope of responsibility, performance, time in role, experience, and competitive market for executive talent

 

  Reflecting (i) continued strong performance across the business, driven by our executive leadership and (ii) the continuing growth in the size and complexity of the Company, in fiscal 2021 the HRCC approved salary increases ranging from 3% to 15%  
             
     

Annual

Incentive

Bonuses

(see page 29)31)

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Variable compensation paid in cash

 

Based on performance against pre-established financial, operational, strategic, and individual performance measures

 

Includes assessment of the Company’s progress towards long-term ESG goals

Financial and non-financial metrics provide a comprehensive assessment of executive performance

 

Performance metrics evaluated annually for alignment with strategy and market trends

 

NEO annual incentives determined through a three-step performance measurement process:

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

Funding Allocation 1 Initial Funding ThresholdPerformance Hurdle Non-GAAP Adjusted EPS 21 Funding Corporate Scorecard Business and Strategic Goals Allocation 2 3 Individual Performance ModifierModifer Individual NEO Performance

  

 

 

 

 

 

Fiscal 2019No increase in target bonusesbonus as a percentage of base salary were the same asfrom fiscal 2018 levels2020 to fiscal 2021 for allany of the NEOs, except forwith the exception of Mr. Durn, whose target was increased to reflect the competitive pay positioning level for annual incentive targets for CFOsHalliday – in connection with his appointment as interim CFO

 

The initial funding threshold performance hurdle for fiscal 2021 was $5.25 of non-GAAP adjusted EPS, goalsignificantly above Applied’s actual result for fiscal 20192020. Actual non-GAAP adjusted EPS for fiscal 2021 was $2.90. The Company achieved an actual result of $3.04$6.84

 

As the initial funding thresholdperformance hurdle was achieved,met, annual bonuses for the annual bonusesNEOs were based on the performance of(i) the Company’s results as compared to the objective and quantifiable business and strategic goals in the corporate scorecard for each NEOand (ii) an assessment of individual performance results as compared to quantitative and strategic objectives

 

Based on achievement compared to goals, fiscal 2019 actual annual bonuses

Resulting payouts ranged from 0.49x112% to 0.69x150% of target for our NEOs

 

— Achievement against the corporateCorporate scorecard modifiers ranged from 0.49x1.12x to 0.65x target1.24x (see corporate scorecard information on pages 3234 and 33)35)

 

— Based on an assessment of individualIndividual performance results and the impact against both quantitative and strategic objectives, each NEO, except for Mr. Durn, received an IPF of 1.0x. Mr. Durn received an IPF ofmodifiers ranged from 1.0x to 1.25x in recognition of his above and beyond performance in successfully managing external investor relationships and his vision and execution in driving major improvements in efficiency and effectiveness across the Finance organization (see individual performance highlightsfactor details on page 34)

36)

  
                         
             
    

Long-Term

Incentives

(see page 35)37)

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

Performance share units (“PSUs”) to establish rigorous long-term performance alignment

 

Restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to provide link to shareholder value creation and for retention value

 

PSUs vest based on achievement of 3-year non-GAAP adjusted operating margin goal and 3-year Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”) measured against TSR relative to the S&P 500 Index

 

PSUs vestsvest at end of 3-year performance period, based on achievement of performance goals; RSUs vest ratably over 3 years

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

The target vehicle mix of the equity awards consists of 75% PSUs and 25% RSUs for the CEO and 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs for the other NEOs

 

Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin is a key measure of our Company’s long-term success

 

For fiscal 2019, the WFE market share metric applicable for fiscal 2018 PSUs was replaced with relativeRelative TSR which better reflects our growing Display and Services businesses, in addition to our semiconductor segment, and incentivizes management to outperform the market through eachin any business environment

 

During fiscal 2021, Value Creation Awards were granted to three key executives. These awards are based on absolute TSR to ensure additional alignment with shareholders and will only deliver value to the participants if Applied achieves unprecedented stock price growth during the five-year performance period and if the executives continue their employment with Applied through the performance period

  
  
             


 

24    2020 Proxy Statement

26    2022 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Pay Mix

In fiscal 2019,2021, a significant portion of our executive compensation consisted of variable compensation and long-term incentives. As illustrated below, 92%95% of CEO compensation for fiscal 2019 comprised2021 consisted of variable compensation elements, and 84% of CEO overall compensation was delivered in equity with multi-year vesting.

 

FY2019Fiscal 2021 Compensation Mix1

CEO

  

All Other NEOs2

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Base Salary 5% Annual Incentive Bonus 10% RSU 17% PSU 67% 84% Long-Term Incentives 95% Variable Compensation

  

LOGO

Base Salary 11% Annual Incentive Bonus 18% RSU 31% PSU 40% 72% Long-Term Incentives 89% Variable Compensation

 

LOGO

1 Represents total direct compensation for FY2019fiscal 2021, including the grant date fair value of annual equity awards but not including the grant date fair value of the Value Creation Awards, which are not expected to be made in subsequent years and are not representative of ongoing compensation.

2 Excludes Mr. Durn, whose fiscal 2021 compensation reflects only partial-year service, and Mr. Halliday, whose fiscal 2021 compensation is not representative of ongoing NEO compensation.

Summary of 20192021 Total Direct Compensation

The following table summarizes elements of annual total direct compensation for our NEOs for fiscal 2019,2021, consisting of (1) base salary, (2) annual incentive bonus and (3) long-term incentive awards (the grant date fair value of stock awards). This table excludes amounts not considered by the HRCC to be annual total direct compensation, such as certain other amounts required by the SEC to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table (see page 4145 of this Proxy Statement). Additionally, the grant date fair value of the Value Creation Awards is shown separately as these awards are not expected to be made in subsequent years and are not representative of annual total direct compensation.

 

Name and Principal Position  Salary
($)
   

Annual
Incentive
Bonus

($)

   

Annual
Long-Term
Incentive
Award

($)

   

Total

($)

 

Gary E. Dickerson
President and Chief Executive Officer

   1,024,808    1,133,000    11,696,506    13,854,314 

Daniel J. Durn
Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

   620,673    580,078    3,931,029    5,131,780 

Ali Salehpour
Senior Vice President, Services, Display and Flexible Technology

   620,673    411,750    3,931,029    4,963,452 

Prabu G. Raja
Senior Vice President, Semiconductor Products Group

   564,058    430,948    2,892,132    3,887,138 

Steve G. Ghanayem
Senior Vice President, New Markets and Alliances Group

   564,058    497,543    2,892,132    3,953,733 


Name and Principal Position  

Salary(1)

($)

   

Annual
Incentive
Bonus

($)

   

Annual
Long-Term
Incentive
Award

($)

   

Total

($)

   

Value
Creation
Award(2)

($)

 

Gary E. Dickerson

President and Chief Executive Officer

   1,049,808    2,039,400    16,696,405    19,785,613    15,014,064 

Prabu G. Raja

Senior Vice President, Semiconductor Products Group

   648,135    1,195,703    4,780,991    6,624,829    4,619,937 

Ali Salehpour

Senior Vice President, Services, Display and Flexible Technology

   653,942    974,152    4,501,365    6,129,459     

Om Nalamasu

Senior Vice President, Chief Technology Officer

   552,789    848,513    3,019,654    4,420,956     

Robert J. Halliday(3)

Interim Chief Financial Officer

   268,500    351,844        620,344     

Daniel J. Durn(4)

Former Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

   681,635        5,312,294    5,993,929    4,619,937 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    25
(1)

Fiscal 2021 consisted of 53 weeks.

(2)

Reflects grant date fair value determined for accounting purposes, of non-recurring performance-based awards. The awards only deliver value to participants if total shareholder return hurdles are met during the five-year performance period and only if participants continue their employment with Applied through the end of the performance period, as described in more detail beginning on page 39.

(3)

Mr. Halliday served as a corporate vice president until his appointment as interim CFO effective September 30, 2021. The base salary and annual incentive bonus shown are prorated for service in, and compensation for, those roles.

(4)

Mr. Durn voluntarily terminated his employment with Applied effective October 15, 2021. His base salary was prorated based on his service during fiscal 2021. In connection with his departure, Mr. Durn forfeited his eligibility for the fiscal 2021 annual incentive bonus and all previously awarded and unvested long-term incentive awards (including the Value Creation Award).

Applied Materials, Inc.    27


Pay and Performance

The HRCC approvessets aggressive performance goals for the CEO, as well as for the entire executive leadership team. As a result, despite outstanding TSR growth from fiscal 20152017 through 2019,2021, our CEO’s ongoing total direct compensation has remained essentially flatwithin a comparable range over the same period. Given the non-recurring nature of the Value Creation Award granted to Mr. Dickerson in early fiscal 2021, that award is not reflected in the chart below. However, the HRCC intends to take the value of that award into consideration when making future compensation decisions for Mr. Dickerson.

 

LOGO

LOGOTotal Direct Compensation (1) Total Shareholder Return (2) $300 $250 $200 $150 $100 $50 $0 Value of $100 Invested on 10/27/2017 FY2017 $14.5 FY2018 $13.7 FY2019 $13.9 FY2020 $17.1 FY2021 $19.8 $60 Annual Total Director Compensation ($ million) $50 $40 $30 $20 $10 $0

 

(1) 

Total direct compensation consists of annual base salary, annual incentive bonus and long-term incentive award (grant date fair value of annual equity awards). Total direct compensation shown above excludes other amounts required by the SEC to be reported in the Summary Compensation Table.Table and, as discussed above, also excludes the grant date fair value of the Value Creation Award.

(2) 

TSR line illustrates the total shareholder return on our common stock during the period from October 23, 201527, 2017 through October 25, 201929, 2021 (the last business day of fiscal 2019)2021), assuming $100 was invested on October 23, 201527, 2017 and assuming reinvestment of dividends.



 

26    2020 Proxy Statement

28    2022 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Other Key Compensation Practices

We are committed to executive compensation practices that drive performance, mitigate risk, and align the interests of our leadership team with the intereststhose of our shareholders. Below is a summary of best practices that we have implemented because we believe they are in the best interests of Applied or our shareholders, and practices that we avoid because we believe they are not in the best interests of Applied or our shareholders.run counter to those interests.

 

WHAT WE DO    WHAT WE DO NOT DO

 

 

 

Pay for Performance– Significant majority of NEO target compensation is performance-based and tied topre-established performance goals aligned with our short- and long-term objectives.

  

 

Ò

 

 

No Guaranteed Bonuses– Our annual bonus plans are performance-based and do not include any guaranteed minimum payment levels.

 

  

 

 

 

 

Mitigation of Risk– Use of varied performance measures and payout limits in incentive programs mitigates risk that executives will be motivated to pursue results with respect to any one performance measure to the detriment of Applied as a whole.

  

 

Ò

 

 

No Hedging or Pledging– Our insider trading policy prohibits all directors, NEOs and other employees from engaging in hedging or other speculative trading, and prohibits directors and NEOs from pledging their shares.

 

  

 

 

 

 

Compensation Recoupment Policy– Both our annual cash bonus plan and our stock incentive plan contain “clawback” provisions providing for reimbursement of incentive compensation from NEOs in certain circumstances.

  

 

Ò

 

 

No Excessive Perquisites– We do not provide material perquisites or other personal benefits to our NEOs or directors, except for security purposes and in connection with business-related relocation.

 

  

 

 

 

 

Stock Ownership Guidelines– All senior officers and directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines to alignensure their interests are aligned with shareholders’ interests.

  

 

Ò

 

 

No Dividends on Unvested Equity Awards– We do not pay dividends or dividend equivalents on unvested equity awards.

 

  

 

 

 

 

Double-TriggerChange-in-Control ProvisionsEquityFor vesting to accelerate, equity awards for all NEOs require a “double-trigger” of both achange-in-control and subsequent termination of employment for vesting acceleration benefits to apply.employment.

  

 

Ò

 

 

No Executive Pensions– We do not offer any executive pension plans.

 

  

 

 

 

 

AnnualSay-On-Pay Vote– We seek annual shareholder feedback on our executive compensation program.

   

 

Ò

 

 

No TaxGross-Ups– We do not pay taxgross-ups, except in connection with business-related relocation or expatriate assignments.



 

Applied Materials, Inc.    27

Applied Materials, Inc.    29


Compensation Governance and Decision-Making Framework

 

 

Overview of Compensation Program Philosophy and Governance Framework

Our executive compensation program has three principal objectives:

 

 To attract, reward and retain highly-talented executive officers and other key employees;

 

 To motivate these individuals to achieve short-term and long-term goals that enhance shareholder value; and

 

 To support our core values and culture.

We seek to achieve these objectives by:

 

 Providing compensation that is competitive with the practices of other leading high-technology companies; and

 

 Linking rewards to Company and individual performance by:

 

  Setting challenging performance goals for executive officers and other key employees;

 

  Balancing retention needs with performance objectives; and

 

  Providing a high proportion of total target compensation in the form of equity incentives to motivate executive officers and other key employees to increase long-term value in alignment with shareholders’ interests.

The HRCC uses these principles to determineset appropriate base salaries,salary levels and to design and determine annual incentive bonuses and long-term incentive awards. The HRCC also considers Applied’s business strategy and objectives, external factors such as the geopolitical and economic environment, competitive practices and trends, and corporate considerations, including the affordabilityoverall cost of the compensation program.

The HRCC further considers the results of the annual advisory“say-on-pay” vote and shareholder feedback. At our Annual Meeting in 2019,2021, our“say-on-pay” proposal received a substantial majority (96%(87%) of votes cast.cast, reflecting continuing strong support for our ongoing executive

compensation program. Based on feedback we heard from investors, we have expanded our disclosure related to the Value Creation Awards this year and re-emphasized that the HRCC does not expect to grant similar awards in the coming years. In consideration of this vote and feedback from our shareholders gathered through our outreach efforts, the HRCC approved an

executive compensation program structure for fiscal 20192021 that is generally unchanged from the fiscal 20182020 program.

Fiscal 20192021 Peer Group Companies

The HRCC regularly reviews compensation paid by our peer group, which consists of a broad range of high-technology companies whose businesses are similar to ours and with whichwhom we typically compete for executive talent, as a reference point for evaluating our compensation program.

For the composition of the fiscal 20192021 peer group, wethe HRCC considered companies that met the following criteria: (1) innovative technology companies with product manufacturing, operations, (2) companies whose revenues orand market capitalization were approximatelyone-thirdone-fourth to five times that of Applied, (3) U.S. based publicly-traded companies with global operations that disclose executive compensation pursuant to SEC rules, and (4) companies that compete with usrepresent: (i) industry competitors, (ii) competitors for key talent, and (5) companies that devote significant resources to research and development as a percentage of revenue(iii) customers or have approximatelyone-half to two times market capitalization to revenue multiple as that of Applied.suppliers, and/or (iv) comparable alternatives for shareholder investment. Based on this assessment, during fiscal 2021 the HRCC determined to remove Juniper Networks, Inc., which was part of the fiscal 2018 peer group, from the fiscal 2019 peer group as it no longer met most of the screening criteria listed above, including revenueSeagate Technology and multiple of market capitalization to revenue. The HRCC added Analog Devices, Inc. to the fiscal 2019 peer group as it met the criteria for multiple of market capitalization to revenue and it has a stronger business fit with Applied relative to Juniper Networks.add NXP Semiconductors. Each of the other companies in the resulting peer group listed below metmeets most if notor all of the fivefour screening criteria and continued to be included in the peer group; in addition, several of the companies were among our principal U.S. competitors or top U.S. customers.criteria.

Data gathered on executive compensation practices across the peer group include base salary levels, bonus targetedpayouts, target and actual cash compensation, long-term incentive awardsaward values and total direct compensation.compensation levels. The HRCC uses this information as a reference point in informing its decision making, rather than to targettargeting a specific percentile of the peer data for our NEOs. The peer group data is gathered from the sources described in Role“Role of Compensation Consultant” below.

 

 

28    2020 Proxy Statement

30    2022 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Our fiscal 20192021 peer group and related information are set forth below.

 

Fiscal 20192021 Peer Group
  

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

  

Micron Technology, Inc.

Analog Devices, Inc.

  

Motorola Solutions, Inc.

Broadcom, Inc.

  

NetApp, Inc.

Cisco Systems, Inc.

  

NVIDIA Corp.

Corning Inc.

  QUALCOMM, Inc.

NXP Semiconductors N.V.

Intel Corp.

  Seagate Technology plc

QUALCOMM, Inc

KLA Corp.

  

Texas Instruments, Inc.

Lam Research Corp.

  

Western Digital Corp.

Applied Materials Positioning Relative to Peers1

 

LOGO

Applied Materials Positioning Relative to Peers LOGO

Revenue 100th percentile Market Capitalization 100th percentile 100thPercentile 50th percentile PercentilepercentileRevenuePercentile Rank

 

1

As of the HRCC’s review in March 2021.

 

 

Components of Total Direct Compensation

 

 

Determining Annual Total Direct Compensation

At the beginning of fiscal 2019,2021, the HRCC evaluated each NEO’s annual total direct compensation – consisting of annual base salary, target annual incentive bonusopportunity for the fiscal year and long-term incentive award.award value – for each NEO (other than Mr. Halliday who became an executive officer near the end of fiscal 2021). As part of this annual evaluation, the HRCC considersconsidered the NEO’s scope of responsibility, performance, skill set, prior experience and achievements, advancement potential, impact on results and expected future contributionscontribution to our business. The HRCC also considersconsidered the compensation levels of aneach executive officer relative to other Applied officers, the need to attract and retain talent, business conditions, and compensation levels at our peer companies for comparable positions; however, no individual element of compensation is targeted to a peer percentile range. TheFollowing the end of fiscal 2021, the HRCC uses peer group data as a tool to assess how our executives’determined payouts for performance-based compensation compares to the market rather than as a means to establish specific target compensation levels. Actual pay results varyprograms, based on the overall performance of the Company and individual NEO performance,NEOs as the largest portion of NEO compensation is performance-based.compared to pre-established objectives.

Base Salaries

Base salaries and bonus opportunities are designed to attract, motivate, reward, and retain executive talent, as well as to align pay with performance. Base salaries represent an annual fixed level of cash compensation. Applied continues to focus the weighting of cash compensation more heavily toward performance-based incentives. At the beginning of each fiscal year, the HRCC determines each NEO’s targeted total cash compensation (salary and target bonus).

Base salaries are an annual fixedBased on its review in early fiscal 2021, the HRCC determined to increase the base salary level of cash compensation.for each NEO, excluding the CEO. The HRCC approved anbelieved that such increases were appropriate given the significant increase for each NEO’s salary to ensure that it continues to reflect competitive pay positioning levelsin the size and complexity of similar roles, as well as to provide adequate retention value. Applied continues to focusand its businesses over the weighting of cash compensation more heavily toward performance-based incentives.preceding

years and the limited increases to NEO salaries during that time. However, the salary level for Mr. Dickerson was unchanged, given the HRCC’s belief that CEO compensation should be predominantly tied to long-term results. Mr. Halliday’s base salary for service as interim CFO was established at the time of his appointment to the role.

Annual Incentive Bonus Opportunities

Bonus Plan Overview. In fiscal 2019,2021, all of our NEOs participated in the Senior Executive Bonus Plan (the “Bonus Plan”)., although Mr. Durn forfeited any potential payout in connection with his departure. The Bonus Plan is a shareholder-approved bonus program designed to motivate and reward achievement of Applied’s business goals, alignedin alignment with delivering shareholder value, and to attract and retain highly-talented individuals. The annual incentive bonus opportunity for each NEO under the Bonus Plan is directly linked to Applied’s achievement of financial and market performance, operational performance, and strategic objectives, in addition to individual performance. Company and individual goals are designed to incentivize management to drive strong operating performance, invest in innovation to drive future growth and create shareholder value. Our Bonus Plan is performance-based and does not include any guaranteed minimum payment levels.

Determining Target Bonus Amounts. Target bonus amounts for the NEOs are expressed as a percentage of base salary. The HRCC approves the annual target bonus amount for each NEO, taking into consideration Mr. Dickerson’s recommendations regarding the annual target bonus amounts for each of the NEOs other than himself. In early fiscal 2019,2021, Mr. Dickerson recommended that, for each NEO other than Mr. Durn,Halliday, who was not an executive officer at the time – the target bonus amounts as a percentage of base salary remain unchanged from fiscal 2018. Mr. Dickerson recommended,2020. Similarly, based on a comprehensive review and the HRCC approved, increasing Mr. Durn’s target bonuswith input from 110% to 135% of his salary to reflect an increase in the competitive pay positioning level for annual incentive targets for CFOs. The HRCC considered a number of factors, including publicly available data and market survey data, as well as an assessment of overall economic and business conditions in deciding not to increase Mr. Dickerson’s target bonus.its independent

 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    29

Applied Materials, Inc.    31


compensation consultant, the HRCC determined not to change Mr. Dickerson’s target bonus amount from fiscal 2020.

Mr. Halliday’s target bonus opportunity for service as interim CFO was established at the time of his appointment to the

role. Mr. Halliday’s fiscal 2021 bonus opportunity was prorated to reflect his service as corporate vice president for the first 11 months of the year and interim CFO for the last month of the year.

Assessing Performance and Payout. The determination of fiscal 20192021 performance and annual incentive bonuses for our NEOs consisted of three key steps, as illustrated in the diagram below and explained in more detail in the followingsubsequent discussion.

 

 

LOGO NEO Bonus Determination LOGO

Initial Funding Threshold Threshold performance requirementPerformance Goal Initial PerformanceHurdle Thresholdperformancerequirement that must bemustbe achieved for maximum bonusesanybonuses to become available Initial funding threshold forbepayable Performance hurdlefor fiscal 2019 was non-GAAP adjusted EPS2021 wasnon-GAAP adjustedEPS of $2.90$5.25 N Corporate ScorecardScorecardE Assessment of performanceofperformance against pre-defined financial, predefinedfinancial,operational, and strategic corporatestrategiccorporate goals For fiscal 2019, for our CEO and CFO, 2021, 50%based on financial andmarket performance;50% based on financialobjectiveand measurableoperational and market performance and execution goals; 50% based on objective and measurable operational and strategic goalsstrategicgoalsO B Individual Performance FactorPerformanceFactoron Assessment of individual NEOindividualNEO performance against personalagainstpersonal objectives andevaluation of contributionto the success of theirrespective business unit orfunction and contributions to the businessoverallApplied successus Determination

 

The HRCC believes that this multi-step performance framework appropriately emphasizes financial performance, while also providing a mechanism to assess achievement of key business imperatives by individual NEOs.

 

Initial Funding Threshold.Performance Hurdle. For fiscal 2019,2021, the HRCC chosenon-GAAP adjusted EPS as the initial funding threshold.performance hurdle. EPS, an indicator of overall Company financial performance, is a measure of profits generated on a per shareper-share basis that are available either to reinvest in the business or to distribute to shareholders, and has a strong link to share price valuation.

If Applied does not achieve a thresholdnon-GAAP adjusted EPS of $2.90 for the fiscal year (set at $5.25 for fiscal 2021), no bonus is payable. If this threshold is achieved, the maximum bonus that becomes payable for each NEO is the lowest of: (a) $5 million, (b) 3x athe corporate bonus pool funding modifier multiplied by the target bonus, and (c) 3x the target bonus, as a percentage of base salary.bonus.

In fiscal 2019,2021, Applied’snon-GAAP adjusted EPS was $3.04,$6.84, resulting in achievement of the initial funding thresholdperformance hurdle under the Bonus Plan. Adjusted EPS is anon-GAAP measure that excludes certain items from EPS determined in accordance with GAAP (see Appendix A for a reconciliation ofnon-GAAP adjusted EPS).

Non-GAAP adjusted EPS does not excludeincludes the impact of share-based compensation expenses.

Balanced Corporate Scorecard. If the initial performance goalhurdle is achieved, the HRCC then usesreviews the level of achievement of pre-defined objectives on the corporate scorecard to evaluate achievement ofpre-defined corporate objectives and goalsdetermines the appropriate scorecard result for each NEO and as a primary mechanism to exercise negative discretion from the maximum bonus amount.fiscal year. The scorecard is designed to measure achievement of financial andnon-financial objectives that are considered by the HRCC to be key drivers of the Company’s near-term financial and operational success that will create shareholder value over the longer-term. The fiscal 20192021 scorecard measured corporatecompany performance in four broad categories: (1) Financial and Market Performance and Execution, (2) Products and Growth, (3) Customers and Field and (4) People and Organization. These categories align with and support the Company’s strategy of strengthening our materials engineering capabilities to enable major technology inflections for our customers and positioning Applied for sustainable growth to support long-term value creation for itsour shareholders. Beginning with fiscal 2021, the corporate scorecard includes ESG objectives, with performance measured based on Applied’s progress towards our long-term ESG goals.

 

 

30    2020 Proxy Statement

32    2022 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Scorecard Category

 

  

Weighting
for CEO

and CFO

 

 

Link to Company Strategy and Performance

 

Financial and Market Performance and Execution  50% 

Financial,Incentivizes achievement of financial, market share and TSR goals align with a focusand focuses on delivering sustainable performance that increases shareholder value

 

IncentivizesAligns with increased efficiency in operational process, product development success and quality and safety performance

Products and Growth  30%32.5% Reinforces strategy of developing new and differentiated products and services and positioning Applied and its products for future revenue and market share growth
Customers and Field  12.5%10% Promotes focus on customer service by improving growth and efficiency at key accounts and applications
People and Organization  7.5% Drives focus on greater employee engagement to promote hiring, retentionprogress towards achieving long-term ESG objectives and developmentenhancing the diversity and inclusion of keyApplied’s talent

 

NEO Objectives and Weightings. Each NEO was assigned individualized weightings for allscorecard measures to reflect the relative impact and contributions of that NEO and his business or organizational unit to Applied’s overall performance with respect to a particular measure. The corporate scorecard objectives and weightings were the same for Mr. Dickerson and Mr. Durn. The objectives and weightings for each NEO are set forth in the table below.

Goal Setting and Measurement. At the beginning of the fiscal year, the HRCC reviewed objectives goals and individual weightings initially proposed by management, and provided input toon the final corporate scorecard and individual weightings for each NEO.NEO (other than Mr. Halliday, whose weightings reflect the general corporate scorecard). Performance hurdles were set to

measure achievement at 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 levels, with a score of 1.0 indicating performance that met very high expectations and scores over 1.0 indicating extraordinary achievement. Scorecard objectives are intended to be very challenging to incentivize our NEOs to achieve performance

levels that are higher than our externally communicated financial targets. Consequently, delivering results below the 100% target level can still represent very meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals. Progress towards achieving the corporate scorecard objectives was evaluated and tracked quarterly during the fiscal year. Scores were awarded for each metric under the scorecard based on the degree to which thepre-determined goals for that metric were achieved. Performance hurdles were set to measure achievement at 0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 levels, with a score of 1.0 indicating performance that met very high expectations and scores over 1.0 indicating extraordinary achievement. At the end of the fiscal year, scores were calculated based on actual performance against objectives and were presented to the HRCC to review, adjust, and approve.

 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    31

Applied Materials, Inc.    33


The following table detailsshows fiscal 20192021 corporate scorecard objectives, their relative weightings for each NEO, the achievements based on performance against rigorous objectives and the resulting scores, as approved by the HRCC (see Appendix A fornon-GAAP reconciliations). The HRCC approved an aggressive set of scorecard targets for the executive officers for fiscal 2019,2021, including financial targets far above any levels that Applied had achieved in the past, as well as equally challenging operational targets. During fiscal 2019,2021, Applied delivered solidexceptional financial and operational performance in a challenging environment and made meaningful progress towards our long-term strategic goals that are focused on enabling strong longer-term revenue and EPS growth; however,growth.

For the results were below aggressively set targets. Accordingly, bonus payoutsfiscal 2021 corporate scorecard, the HRCC added a broader ESG objective – beyond the Company’s existing focus on diversity and inclusion – to demonstrate Applied’s commitment to driving sustainability throughout our executive officers were below target bonus amounts.business and to provide a discrete incentive for management to execute on our new ESG strategy. While the Company’s ESG goals are long-term in nature, the HRCC believes that it is important to annually review, measure and assess progress towards those goals. As a result, the HRCC included ESG objectives in the annual incentive program, rather than in long-term incentive awards. More detail on the Company’s ESG framework and 2021 objectives and accomplishments can be found on page xii.

 

  Weightings  

Achievements

 

Score

 
Objectives Dickerson
and Durn
  Salehpour  Raja  Ghanayem 
Financial and Market Performance and Execution  50.0%   47.5%   50.0%   40.0%       

Grow wafer fabrication equipment (measured by Gartner) market share

                 

Expecting growth in wafer fabrication equipment market share but below the aggressive targeted share increase in calendar 2019

  0.5 

Achieve adjusted gross margin targets (gross margin reported externally)

                 

Delivered 44.0%non-GAAP adjusted gross margin, but below the aggressive targets set for the year

  0.0 

Achieve adjusted operating margin goal (operating margin reported externally)

                 

Achieved 23.5%non-GAAP adjusted operating margin, narrowly missing the aggressive targets set for the year

  0.5 

Achieve TSR target relative to peers

                 

Achieved targeted TSR performance relative to semiconductor equipment peer group

  1.0 

Improve operational, quality and safety performance

                 

Successfully drove improvements in delivery times, materials costs, quality and safety

  1.0 

Products and Growth

  30.0%   37.5%   25.0%   42.5%       

Demonstrate progress towards ability to deliver targeted fiscal 2023 revenue for semiconductor businesses

                 

Met aggressive milestones towards delivering 2023 revenue target for semiconductor businesses

  1.0 

Demonstrate progress towards ability to deliver targeted fiscal 2023 revenue for Display business

                 

Made significant progress towards delivering 2023 revenue target for Display business but some results were below the aggressive goals set for the year

  0.5 

Grow Service revenue per target

                 

Delivered record Service revenue but fell short of the aggressive service revenue growth target for the year

  0.0 

Develop growth pipeline to deliver targeted fiscal 2021 revenue and create opportunities in core and new businesses

                 

Developed strong pipeline of opportunities to drive significant future growth but fell slightly short of aggressive targets

  0.5 

Customers and Field

  12.5%   7.5%   17.5%   10.0%       

Achieve growth and efficiency metrics at key accounts

                 

Achieved aggressive field management goals at the majority of, but not all, key accounts

  0.5 

Win development tool of record and production tool of record positions at key customers; grow target applications for systems and service

                 

Delivered many development tool of record and production tool of record positions, which set us up well for the future, but below the aggressive targets set for the year. Achieved many significant milestones for application growth for systems and service, but below the aggressive targeted goals for the year

  0.5 

Validate Preferred Strategic Partner customer engagements worth targeted fiscal 2023 revenue that create value for customers and meaningfully expand systems and service business

                 

The Preferred Strategic Partner goal is set as a multiple year objective to go far beyond our existing customer relationships. In 2019, we achieved many milestones for Preferred Strategic Partner engagements, however, fell short of some aggressive targets set for the year

  0.5 
  Weightings  

Achievements

 

Score

 
Objectives Dickerson  Halliday  Raja  Salehpour  Nalamasu 
Financial and Market Performance and Execution  50%   50%   50%   50%   50%       

· Grow wafer fabrication equipment market share (measured by VLSI Research)

  12%   12%   12%   12%   12%  

Delivered record revenue and increased company level backlog by 77%, but due to late-year supply chain challenges, CY21 share is forecasted to be roughly flat

  0.5 

· Achieve targeted Service revenue growth

  2%   2%   2%   2%   2%  

Exceeded Service growth goal and delivered record Service revenue for the year

  1.25 

· Achieve targeted Free Cash Flow

  4%   4%   4%   4%   4%  

Generated Free Cash Flow modestly below challenging target for the year

  0.75 

Achieve adjusted gross margin targets (gross margin reported externally)

  10%   10%   10%   10%   10%  

Delivered 47.5% non-GAAP adjusted gross margin, 2.4% higher than fiscal 2020

  1.25 

Achieve adjusted operating margin goal (operating margin reported externally)

  10%   10%   10%   10%   10%  

Achieved 31.7% non-GAAP adjusted operating margin, 5.4% higher than fiscal 2020

  1.0 

Achieve Total Shareholder Return (TSR) ranking target relative to peers

  10%   10%   10%   10%   10%  

Led all peers with fiscal 2021 TSR of 159%

  2.0 

Improve operational, quality and safety performance

  2%   2%   2%   2%   2%  

Successfully drove improvements in key operational, quality and safety metrics

  1.0 

Products and Growth

  32.5%   32.5%   32.5%   32.5%   42.5%       

Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2024 performance for semiconductor businesses

  15%   15%   20%   5%   2.5%  

Exceeded aggressive milestones towards delivering 2024 revenue target for semiconductor businesses

  1.5 

Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2024 performance for Display business

  5%   5%   1.5%   12.5%   7.5%  

Made progress towards delivering 2024 targets for Display business, but some results were below the aggressive goals set for the year

  0.5 

Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2024 performance for Service business

  7.5%   7.5%   7.5%   10%   2.5%  

Made significant progress towards 2024 targets for the Service business

  1.25 

Deliver key milestones that demonstrate progress towards targeted fiscal 2024 performance for new/adjacent market growth

  5%   5%   3.5%   5%   30%  

Developed strong pipeline of opportunities in new and adjacent growth areas

  1.1 

Customers

  10%   10%   10%   10%   —         

Win development tool of record and production tool of record positions at key customers; grow target applications for systems and service

  5%   5%   5%   5%   —    

Exceeded aggressive development and production tool of record goals, as well as application growth goals for systems and service

  1.5 

Execute Preferred Strategic Partner plans by customer

  5%   5%   5%   5%   —    

Exceeded milestones measuring our status as the Preferred Strategic Partner to our customers

  1.5 

 

32    2020 Proxy Statement

34    2022 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

  Weightings  

Achievements

 

Score

 
Objectives Dickerson
and Durn
  Salehpour  Raja  Ghanayem 

People and Organization

  7.5%   7.5%   7.5%   7.5%       

Improve overall health score and employee engagement score relative to 2018 organizational health index survey results

                 

Despite both a challenging business climate and robust talent market, in 2019, we achieved the same overall health score and employee engagement score as the previous year

  0.5 

Accelerate diversity and inclusion initiative by increasing targeted representation of women and underrepresented minorities, improving culture of inclusion and setting goals, plans and scoring matrices for certain business and functional organizations

                 

Formed fully-dedicated team to support work in designing a culture of inclusion, which is a catalyst to accelerate progress toward increasing diversity in the workforce. Established Culture of Inclusion Framework and inclusion strategy to include innovative approaches with intentional focus on leadership, eliminating systematic barriers and fostering engagement

  0.5 

Implement next phase of organizational development strategy

     

Drove organizational development by ensuring that 89% of regular full-time employees had development objectives in Workday by end of Q2 and employees participating in training PATHWAY completed 89% of all assigned training by end of fiscal 2019

  1.5 

Goals tied to objective and quantifiable metrics aligned with Company strategy

 

 

  Weightings  

Achievements

 

Score

 
Objectives Dickerson  Halliday  Raja  Salehpour  Nalamasu 

People and Organization

  7.5%   7.5%   7.5%   7.5%   7.5%       

ESG objective – Demonstrate targeted progress towards increasing representation of women and underrepresented minorities

  3%   3%   3%   3%   3%  

Continued progress toward achieving our longer-term objectives, but fell short of near-term representation goals

  0.75 

ESG objective – Demonstrate progress towards achieving other long-term Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) goals

  2.5%   2.5%   2.5%   2.5%   2.5%  

Met key 2021 milestones towards Company’s 2030 ESG goals

  1.5 

Drive organizational development

  2%   2%   2%   2%   2%  

Exceeded employee training and development goals

  1.5 

Score based on achievement of goals tied to objective and quantifiable metrics aligned with Company strategy

 

 

 

Individual Performance Factor. The HRCC also considered the individual performance of each NEO as indicated by that NEO’s individual performance factor (“IPF”). The IPF applied only if the initial funding thresholdperformance hurdle and at least some of the corporate scorecard objectives were achieved. The IPF modified the initial bonus amount as determined based on achievement against the corporate scorecard objectives. The IPF modifier rangesmodifiers can range from 0 to 1.5.

The HRCC determined the IPFs for all NEOs. In determining the IPFs, the HRCC took into consideration: (i) financial performance, which came in near thresholdexceeded target performance on EPS, (ii) results of the corporate scorecard and associated goals, (iii) performance during the second half ofleadership team’s ability to guide Applied through continued unprecedented disruption caused by the fiscal year, which was considered to be very strong given the reduction in WFE market size seen in the first two quarters of the year,COVID-19 global pandemic, and (iv) TSR performance, which increased materially from the endeach executive’s capable leadership of fiscal 2018 through to the end of fiscal 2019.his respective business unit or function.

The HRCC determined the IPF for each NEO, other than Mr. Dickerson, by taking into consideration Mr. Dickerson’s recommendation, which included his assessment of the achievement of strategic, financial, operational, and organizational performance goals specific to the business or organizational unit for which the NEO was responsible, as well as the NEO’s leadership skills and current and expected contributions to the business.

For fiscal 2019,2021, in light of the significant effortsaccomplishments by each NEO in leading his respective organization, and in Mr. Dickerson’s case, Applied, and in recognition of the significant teamwork required of the leadership team to deliver solidstrong financial results despite challenging market conditions,navigating the continued unprecedented challenges of a global pandemic, the HRCC determined that Mr. Dickerson’s individual performance aligned with the majority of his leadership team atan IPF for each NEO ranging between 1.0 and assigned each NEO an IPF of 1.0, with the exception of Mr. Durn, who was assigned an IPF of 1.25, as recommended by Mr. Dickerson. Mr. Durn’s IPF was in recognition of his above and beyond performance in successfully managing external investor relationships and communications and his vision and execution in driving major improvements in efficiency and effectiveness across the Finance organization.1.25.

 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    33

Applied Materials, Inc.    35


The following table shows the highlights of each NEO’s performance in fiscal 20192021 that the HRCC considered in determining their respective IPFs.

 

NEO

  

 

Fiscal 20192021 Individual Performance Highlights

Gary E. Dickerson

  

  

Delivered annualLed Applied to record performance for the year, growing revenue of $14.6 billion34% andnon-GAAP adjusted EPS of $3.04by 64% year-over-year

  

  Positioned Applied for future growth,Grew our backlog at a company level to win at key industry inflections and$11.8 billion, up 77% compared to execute well in a range of market conditions

Daniel J. Durn

Delivered annual revenue of $14.6 billion andnon-GAAP adjusted EPS of $3.04the same period last year
  Drove organization to make significant progress in key strategic areas that position Applied to deliver its targeted 2024 financial model

Positioned Applied as one of the semiconductors industry’s leaders in ESG

Prabu G. Raja

  Successfully managed external investor relationships

Delivered record annual performance with Semiconductor Systems revenue growth of 43% year-over-year, while navigating significant year-end supply chain constraints and communicationsother ongoing COVID-19-related challenges

  

  Drove major improvementsDemonstrated strong momentum in efficiencykey growth areas, specifically etch, CMP and effectiveness acrosspackaging, while continuing to establish Applied as a clear leader in the Finance organizationDRAM market and maintaining leadership in Foundry-Logic

Bringing highly enabling future technologies to market through a combination of organic R&D and strategic partnerships

Ali Salehpour

  

  

Delivered record Applied Global Services revenues of $3.9$5.0 billion

  

  Increased the number of installed base tools covered by long-term service agreementagreements by approximately 30%65% since 2017, to nearly 15,000, and increased the average tenure of those agreements
  

Delivered revenues in Display of $1.7$1.6 billion and maintained profitability in a down market

Prabu G. Raja

Om Nalamasu

  

  Delivered Semiconductor Systems revenues of $9.0 billion

Identified disruptive opportunities and developed and accelerated potential future growth platforms

  

  Announced acquisition of Kokusai Electric (scheduledNegotiated and secured external funding from customers and governments to close in 2020)

Continued to developsupport and accelerate the Company’s innovation pipeline of new products to address future technology inflections to fuel growth

Steve G. Ghanayem

Continued to drive new industry engagements through New Markets and Alliances group
   

Led the Applied Ventures group’s efforts in both investing for returns and incubating promising businesses in new and adjacent markets

Robert J. Halliday

  Opened leading edge Materials Engineering Technology Accelerator research

Seamlessly resumed the CFO role, guiding the Company through the fiscal 2021 year-end and development center in the State of New Yorkfiscal 2022 goal setting processes

Actual Bonus Payouts. The diagram below shows the results for each of the three key steps in determining the NEOs’ fiscal 20192021 annual incentive bonuses. Despite achieving solidAs a result of our exceptional financial performance, and manyachievement of most of our fiscal 20192021 corporate scorecard objectives, there were certain important scorecard areas where we did not reach the targets set at the beginning of the year, which reducedand significant individual contributions, bonus payouts for our NEOs by,were, on average, 41% fromapproximately 30% above target bonus amounts.

Fiscal 20192021 Annual Incentive Calculation

 

 

    

Performance Measures

   

Fiscal 20192021 Achievement

    

LOGOLOGO

Initial Performance GoalHurdle

  

 

  Fiscal 20192021 non-GAAP adjusted EPS of $2.90$5.25

  

  Achievednon-GAAP adjusted EPS of $3.04$6.84

 

    
LOGO

Corporate Scorecard


LOGO
  

 

  Strong performance on core objectives:

– Financial and Market Performance and Execution

– Products and Growth

– Customers and Field

– People and Organization

 

  

  NEO scorecardScorecard resultsachieved in a range from 0.491.12 to 0.651.24 based on individual weightings

 

    

LOGO

IndividualInitial Performance Modifier

LOGO

  

 

  NEO performance against personal objectives and individual contribution to business performance

 

  

  IPFachieved at 1.0in a range from 1.00 to 1.25 for all NEOs except Mr. Durn at 1.25

 

    LOGOLOGO
    

 

Average NEO bonus, as
multiple of target: 0.591.32

 

 

 

34    2020 Proxy Statement

36    2022 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

The following table shows for each NEO: (1) the maximum amount payable under the Bonus Plan,bonus-eligible base salary, (2) the target bonus amount expressed as a percentage of base salary, (3) the target bonus expressed as a dollar amount and (4) the actual fiscal 20192021 bonus amount approved by the HRCC and paid to the NEO.

 

NEO    

(1)

Maximum

Bonus

Payable

($)

    

(2)

Target
Bonus as a
Percentage
of Base

Salary

(%)

    

(3)

Target

Bonus

($)

     

(4)

Actual

Bonus

($)

     

(1)

Base Salary

($)

     

(2)

Target
Bonus as a
Percentage
of Base

Salary

(%)

    

(3)

Target

Bonus

($)

     

(4)

Actual

Bonus

($)

 

Gary E. Dickerson

    

$5,000,000

    

200%

    

$

2,060,000

 

    

$

1,133,000

 

    

$

1,030,000

 

    

150%

    

$

1,545,000

 

    

$

2,039,400

 

Daniel J. Durn

    

$2,531,250

    

135%

    

$

843,750

 

    

$

580,078

 

Prabu G. Raja

    

$

650,000

 

    

135%

    

$

877,500

 

    

$

1,195,703

 

Ali Salehpour

    

$2,531,250

    

135%

    

$

843,750

 

    

$

411,750

 

    

$

645,000

 

    

135%

    

$

870,750

 

    

$

974,152

 

Prabu G. Raja

    

$2,296,350

    

135%

    

$

765,450

 

    

$

430,948

 

Steve G. Ghanayem

    

$2,296,350

    

135%

    

$

765,450

 

    

$

497,543

 

Om Nalamasu

    

$

550,000

 

    

120%

    

$

660,000

 

    

$

848,513

 

Robert J. Halliday(1)

    

$

265,417

 

    

88%

    

$

234,563

 

    

$

351,844

 

(1)

Mr. Halliday was appointed interim CFO September 30, 2021. His base salary, target bonus opportunity and actual bonus reflect 11 months of service as corporate vice president and one month of service as interim CFO during fiscal 2021.

Pay Driven by Operating Performance. Our process for determining annual bonus awards has resulted in strong pay and performance alignment. Despite achieving solid financial performance and many of the fiscal 2019 corporate scorecard objectives that position Applied for strong longer-term growth, there were certain important scorecard areas where we did not reach the aggressive targets set at the beginning of the year, which resulted in a lower bonus payout for our CEO than for fiscal 2018. The chart below shows the actual annual bonus awards to our CEO as a percentage of his target bonus opportunity and ournon-GAAP adjusted EPS achievements over the last five fiscal years.

CEO Actual Annual Bonus vs. Earnings Per Share

 

 

LOGO

LOGO

Actual Annual Bonus Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Share $7.00 $6.00 $5.00 $4.00 $3.00 $2.00 $1.00 $0.00 Actual Annual Bonus as % of Target Actual Annual Bonus as % of Target Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Share Actual Annual Bonus ($ millions)132% 72% 55% 116% 132% FY2017 FY2018 FY2019 FY2020 FY2021 150% 125% 100% 75% 50% 25% 0%

Non-GAAP adjusted EPS is a performance target under our bonus plan. See Appendix A fornon-GAAP reconciliations.

 

Long-Term Incentives

Overview. Applied’s long-term incentive compensation program is intended to help (1) achievefocus participants on achieving our business objectives, (2) attract, motivateretain, and retainmotivate key talent, and (3) align our executives’ interests with shareholders’ interests to maximize long-term shareholder value.

Timing of Awards. The HRCC grants equity and other long-term incentive awards to NEOs under our shareholder-shareholder-approved Employee

approved Employee Stock Incentive Plan (the “Stock Plan”). The HRCC has not granted, nor does it intend to grant, equity awards in anticipation of the release of material, nonpublic information that is likely to result in changes to the price of our common stock, such as a significant positive or negative earnings announcement. Similarly, Applied has not timed, nor does it intend to time, the release of material, nonpublic information based on equity award grant dates.

 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    35

Applied Materials, Inc.    37


Payout of Fiscal 2017 Performance Share Unit Awards

The performance share units (“PSUs”) granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2017 were scheduled to vest three years from the grant date based on achievement of averagenon-GAAP adjusted operating margin for fiscal 2017 through fiscal 2019 and average WFE market share for calendar years 2016 through 2018, with equal weighting given to each metric. In setting targets for the PSUs, the HRCC considered a number of factors, including the Company’s past performance, analyst expectations, current and expected macro-economic forces, the spectrum of potential outcomes, and competitor positioning. The number of PSUs that may vest was based on the achievement of threshold (minimum required for a payout), target or maximum levels of each metric and may range from 50% to 200% of the target number of shares. The threshold, target and maximum levels and actual achievement for each metric, as well as overall payout for the fiscal 2017 PSUs, are shown below.

 

  

Three-Year Average

    

  Metric

 

Threshold

  

Target

  

Maximum

  

Result

  

Payout

 

 Operating Margin(1)

 

 

19.3%

 

 

 

 21.3%

 

 

 

25.1%

 

 

 

26.8%

 

 

 

200.0%

 

 WFE Share

 

 

18.4%

 

 

 

 20.4%

 

 

 

25.5%

 

 

 

20.9%

 

 

 

111.0%

 

 Total

                 

 

155.5%

 

(1)

See Appendix A for a reconciliation ofnon-GAAP adjusted operating margin.

The payout of the fiscal 2017 PSUs for each NEO is shown below.

  NEO   

Target
Number of
PSUs


 
  

Number of
PSUs
Earned

 
 

 Dickerson

  

 

280,316

 

 

 

435,892

 

 Durn

  

 

33,535

(1) 

 

 

52,147

 

 Salehpour

  

 

66,466

 

 

 

103,324

 

 Raja

  

 

51,911

 

 

 

80,722

 

 Ghanayem

  

 

51,911

 

 

 

80,722

 

(1)

Mr. Durn’s PSU award waspro-rated based on his hire date of August 2017.

Fiscal 20192021 Equity Awards

The HRCC believes that a meaningful portion of NEOs’ target compensation should be in the form of long-term incentives. These awards are intended to reward performance over a multi-year period, align the interests of executives with those of shareholders, instill an ownership culture, enhance the personal stake of executive officers in the growth and success of the Company, and provide an incentive for continued service at the Company.

Given the strong support received from our shareholders on our incentive programs last year, we continued our approach to make performance-based equity awards a substantial portion of the overall value of equity awards granted to our NEOsNEOs.

The fiscal 2021 long-term incentive awards for NEOs (excluding Mr. Halliday who did not receive any equity awards during fiscal 2021) consist of two forms of equity vehicles: PSUsperformance share units and restricted stock units (“RSUs”).units. The target vehicle mix of the awards for the fiscal 20192021 grant remains unchanged from the previous year’s grants and consists of 75% PSUs and 25% RSUs for the CEO and 50% PSUs and 50% RSUs for the other NEOs. This does not include the Value Creation Awards, which are discussed beginning on page 39.

 

CEO LTI Vehicle Mix All Other NEO LTI
Vehicle Mix

LOGO

25% RSUs 75% PSUs Performance Based

 

LOGO

 

LOGO

LOGO50% RSUs 50% PSUs Performance Based

For fiscal 2019,2021, in December 2018,2020, the HRCC granted the number of PSUs and RSUs listed in the below table to our NEOs. The awards shown for Mr. Durn were forfeited in connection with his departure.

NEO   

Target Value
of Awards
(1)

($)


 

 

   


Equivalent
Target
Number of
PSUs
(2)



 
     

Equivalent
Number of
RSUs
(2)


 

Dickerson

  

$

11,845,000

 

  

 

256,090

 

    

 

85,364

 

Durn

  

$

4,025,000

 

  

 

58,014

 

    

 

58,014

 

Salehpour

  

$

4,025,000

 

  

 

58,014

 

    

 

58,014

 

Raja

  

$

2,961,250

 

  

 

42,682

 

    

 

42,682

 

Ghanayem

  

$

2,961,250

 

  

 

42,682

 

    

 

42,682

 

NEO   

Target Value
of Awards
(1)

($)


 

 

   


Equivalent
Target
Number of
PSUs
(2)



 
     

Equivalent
Number of
RSUs
(2)


 

Dickerson

  

$

14,025,000

 

  

 

122,169

 

    

 

40,723

 

Raja

  

$

4,275,000

 

  

 

24,826

 

    

 

24,826

 

Salehpour

  

$

4,025,000

 

  

 

23,374

 

    

 

23,374

 

Nalamasu

  

$

2,700,000

 

  

 

15,680

 

    

 

15,680

 

Durn

  

$

4,750,000

 

  

 

27,585

 

    

 

27,585

 

 (1)

ValueReflects target value of awards is based on Applied’s stock price on the grant date.date of grant. Amounts shown in the “Stock Awards” column of the Summary Compensation Table represent grant date fair value determined pursuant to Accounting Standards Codification 718.

 (2) 

Number of sharesunits calculated by dividing value of awards by $34.69,$86.10, the closing price of Applied stock on December 6, 2018,3, 2020, the grant date.

Size of Performance-Based Equity Awards. In determining the size of the awards, the HRCC considered each NEO’s award as a component of his total direct compensation. Target fiscal 20192021 long-term equity awards were determined in light of each NEO’s scope of responsibility, performance, impact on results and expected future contributions to our business, compensation levels relative to other Applied officers, the need to attract and retain talent, and business conditions. In addition, the fiscal 20192021 target award sizes provided sufficient performance-based equity incentives to

36    2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

align compensation with the long-term interests of our shareholders, were in line with market norms for the NEOs’ respective roles and were sufficient to provide incentive for them.them to achieve Applied’s performance goals over a multi-year period.

Performance Share Units. The long-term incentive program isPSU awards are designed to align performance metricsNEO compensation – and therefore NEO decision making – with our strategic goals over a three-year performance period. Based on discussions with our shareholders, the ongoing examination of the effectiveness of the program across the entire enterprise, and considering simplicity and consistency, for the fiscal 2019 grant, the HRCC approved changing one of thelong term. The two metrics of the PSU portion of the long-term incentive program. The first metric, three-year average operating margin, remainsprogram remain unchanged from previousthe prior year’s grants. The second performance metric, beginning with the fiscal 2019 grant, is relative TSR performance measured against the S&P 500 Index over the three-year performance period. Given the continued evolution of the Company’s business, including the increase in the portions of the business outside of WFE, the HRCC approved eliminating the WFE metric in the PSUs in favor of relative TSR, which applies across the entire enterprise. The HRCC has maintained these two metrics in the long-term incentive program design for fiscal 2020.

The fiscal 20192021 PSUs, granted in December 2018,2020, will vest three years from the grant date based on achievement of averagenon-GAAP adjusted operating margin for fiscal 20192021 through fiscal 20212023 and TSR relative to the S&P 500 over the performance period of November 2019the first day of fiscal 2021 through October 2021,the last day of fiscal 2023, with equal weighting given to each metric. The HRCC selected the S&P 500 index as the peer set for the relative TSR metric because enough differences exist between Applied and other companies in the technology and/or semiconductor space to make identifying a comparable industry-specific peer group impractical and because the HRCC believes the S&P 500 represents an appropriate proxy for the investment alternatives available to the Company’s shareholders.

38    2022 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

LOGO

LOGO

FY19FY21 Long-Term Incentive Plan Metrics 50% Relative TSR-3-year Average CapturesTSR 3-year average captures the full scale of our business and greater incentivizesincentives management to outperform the market through eachin any business environment.environment 50% Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Profit Margin-3-year Average ReflectsMargin 3-year average reflects an important measure of profitability, value creation, and the ability of management to improve operational efficiency over time. It is also a key metric for our shareholders. 50%

The number of PSUs that maywill vest iswill be based on the achievement of threshold (minimum required for a payout), target or maximum levels offor each metric and maycan range from 50% to 200% of the target number of shares, as set forth below.

 

Achievement Level   

Percentage  

of Shares  

That May  

Vest  


Threshold

  

 

50%

 

Target

  

 

100%

 

Maximum

  

 

200%

 

A TSR payout factor will be determined by calculating the Company’s TSR percentile rank within the S&P 500, with threshold, target and maximum levels based on Applied’s TSR ranking of above the 25th, 50th and 75th percentile, respectively, of the S&P 500. The TSR calculation uses a60-day trailing average stock price at the beginning and end of the performance period for measurement purposes. This approach minimizes the impact of a single beginning and ending point stock price for each performance cycle.

If the threshold level is not achieved, then no shares will vest. If achievement falls between threshold and target or target and maximum levels, the portion of the award that maywould vest will be determined based on straight-line interpolation.

In setting goals for the PSUs, the HRCC considered Applied’s historical results and relative performance, and established goals that are aligned with Applied’s financial and strategic objectives and will require significant effort to achieve the maximum level.

The HRCC also approvedfiscal 2021 PSU and RSU awards are subject to retirement provisions applicable to long-term incentive awards, beginning with fiscal 2019 awards. The provisions, which, became effective in January 2020,the event of a qualifying retirement based on age and years of service, provide for a partial payout of the PSU awards based on actual performance at the conclusion of the three-year performance period and partial accelerated vesting of RSU awards in the event of a qualifying retirement based on age and years of service.awards. The provisions establish a consistent retirement policy for the executive team reporting to the CEO and are designed to maintain engagement and focus, as well as provide retention incentive, for our executive officers as somewhen they approach potential retirement decisions.

Restricted Stock Units.The RSU awards are scheduled to vest ratably over three years, providing a link to shareholder value creation and maintaining retention value.

Payout of Fiscal 2019 Performance Share Unit Awards

The PSUs granted to our NEOs in fiscal 2019 were scheduled to vest three years from the grant date based on achievement of average non-GAAP adjusted operating margin for fiscal 2019 through fiscal 2021 and relative TSR percentile rank within the S&P 500 for fiscal 2019 through fiscal 2021, with equal weighting given to each metric. In setting the adjusted operating margin targets for the PSUs, the HRCC considered a number of factors, including the Company’s past performance, analyst expectations, then-current and expected macro-economic forces, the spectrum of potential outcomes, and competitor positioning. The number of PSUs that could vest was based on the achievement of threshold (minimum required for a payout), target or maximum levels of each metric and could range from 50% to 200% of the target number of shares. The threshold, target and maximum levels and actual achievement for each metric, as well as overall payout for the fiscal 2019 PSUs, are shown below.

  

Three-Year Average

    

  Metric

 

Threshold

  

Target

  

Max

  

Result

  

Payout

 

  Operating Margin(1)

 

 

25.2%

 

 

 

27.2%

 

 

 

31.9%

 

 

 

27.2%

 

 

 

99.17%

 

  Relative TSR

 

 


25th


%ile

 


 

 

 

50th
%ile

 
 

 

 

75th
%ile

 
 

 

 

97th
%ile

 
 

 

 

200%

 

  Total

                 

 

149.6%

 

(1)

See Appendix A for a reconciliation of non-GAAP adjusted operating margin.

The payout of the fiscal 2019 PSUs for each NEO (with the exception of Mr. Halliday, who was not an executive officer and did not receive PSUs in fiscal 2019, and Mr. Durn who forfeited his award in connection with his departure) is shown below.

  NEO   

Target
Number of
PSUs


 
   

Number of
PSUs
Earned


 

  Dickerson

  

 

256,090

 

  

 

383,111

 

  Raja

  

 

42,682

 

  

 

63,853

 

  Salehpour

  

 

58,014

 

  

 

86,789

 

  Nalamasu

  

 

30,731

 

  

 

45,973

 

Value Creation Awards

During fiscal 2020, the HRCC conducted a comprehensive review of the compensation for the Company’s senior executives, including the NEOs. As a result of that review, the HRCC determined that an incremental long-term performance-based award for certain key executives would

Applied Materials, Inc.    39


be appropriate, prudent and in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Consequently, in December 2020, the HRCC approved a non-recurring long-term PSU award (“Value Creation Award”) for Mr. Dickerson of a target number of 116,145 PSUs with a value of $10 million based on Applied’s closing stock price on the grant date. The HRCC also approved Value Creation Awards for Mr. Durn and Dr. Raja, each with a target number of 33,769 PSUs and a grant value of $3 million. Mr. Durn forfeited his award as a result of his departure.

The Value Creation Awards only deliver value to the executive officers to the extent that aggressive total shareholder return milestones are met during the five-year performance period ending on October 26, 2025 (“Performance Period”) and require the officers to remain employed through the end of the Performance Period. The total shareholder return milestones require significant stock price growth from Applied’s stock price on the grant date – which already represented the highest share price in the Company’s history.

Rationale. The decision to grant the Value Creation Awards reflected the Applied Board’s confidence in the Company’s strategy and leadership team. The Board believed that the technology industry was at an inflection point, which presented a range of unprecedented opportunities for our Company, and that Mr. Dickerson is the right executive to guide Applied, and Dr. Raja, the Semiconductor Products Group, to enable Applied to take full advantage of these opportunities to grow shareholder value.

The Value Creation Awards were also made in acknowledgement of the extremely competitive market for proven executive talent among our direct peers as well as broader technology companies, as underscored by Mr. Durn’s subsequent departure. The HRCC believed that the awards were an appropriate step to mitigate the potential risks to Applied posed by having to replace any of these key leaders over the next several years.

Finally, the HRCC designed the Value Creation Awards to directly align the officers’ interests with the long-term interests of our shareholders by delivering value only if Applied’s stock price growth – having achieved the then-highest stock price in the Company’s history on the grant date – and dividends paid, exceed hurdles that were set at levels that the HRCC believed would be very challenging to achieve and would represent exceptional performance if accomplished.

Award Design. With input from its independent compensation consultant, the HRCC considered a number of potential award designs and performance measures before ultimately approving the Value Creation Awards. The HRCC designed the Value Creation Awards to:

Motivate the officers to deliver ambitious EPS growth – far above expected overall semiconductor industry growth;

Strive for price-to-earnings multiple expansion – by demonstrating Applied’s superior long-term growth potential;
Tie payouts directly to Applied’s stock price growth and dividend payout – a replica of our shareholders’ experience; and

Support the long-term retention of key executives – with a substantially longer performance/vesting period as compared to the annual RSU and PSU awards – requiring continued employment through the five-year performance period for any of the award to vest.

The HRCC also acknowledged that while the Value Creation Awards provide incentive and retention value, they represent only one component of the compensation for Mr. Dickerson and Dr. Raja. As a result, the HRCC believed that it was appropriate to tie the Value Creation Awards solely to Applied’s TSR performance, rather than relative TSR results or operational metrics, as these important measures are already incorporated into the ongoing executive compensation program.

Potential payout under the Value Creation Awards is based on achievement of specified levels of total shareholder return (“TSR Hurdle”) during the five-year Performance Period. The TSR Hurdle is calculated as Applied’s average closing stock price for any consecutive 20 trading days during the Performance Period, plus dividends paid during the Performance Period. The HRCC selected a 20-day average to ensure that payouts are based on the achievement of sustained stock price performance. The Value Creation Awards will only be earned if Applied achieves a significant increase in TSR during the five-year Performance Period. Additionally, as share-based awards, any value delivered to the officers will depend not only on the number of units earned but also on Applied’s share price at the end of the Performance Period when the awards vest. In other words, if Applied’s stock price decreases, the value of any award realized by participants similarly declines. Finally, the awards require the executives to remain employed with the Company through the end of the five-year Performance Period, except in the event of involuntary termination of employment without cause, death or following a change of control.

In determining the magnitude of the Value Creation Awards, the HRCC considered the value of the target number of PSUs at the time of grant, including when prorated over the Performance Period, as well as the potential future value of the PSUs assuming achievement at various performance levels. The HRCC evaluated the awards in the context of the executives’ overall compensation levels among their counterparts at peer companies, award values for similar non-recurring, long-term incentive awards among executives at other large technology companies, and annual award values approved by the HRCC for the officers. The awards were set at magnitudes that the HRCC believed would provide sufficient incentive for participants to achieve the challenging performance hurdles but that would keep their overall compensation – including the prorated value of the Value Creation Awards – at market-competitive levels.

Performance Goals. The actual number of PSUs that may be earned by each officer ranges from 0% to 200% of the target number of PSUs based on achievement of the TSR Hurdles

40    2022 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

shown below. If the threshold TSR Hurdle of $104.40 is not achieved, then no PSUs will vest. If the actual TSR achievement falls between the pre-defined levels, the portion of the award that may vest will be determined based on straight-line interpolation. Any PSUs earned shall vest in full at the end of the Performance Period, subject to continued employment through the vesting date. The vesting requirement would be modified in the event of involuntary termination of employment without cause, death or following a change of control, prior to the end of the Performance Period.

For purposes of determining the hurdles for the Value Creation Awards, TSR was measured as the increase in the market price of our common stock plus cash dividends paid on a per share basis as compared to the base price of $76.94 (the “Baseline Price”), which represents the average closing price of Applied’s common stock during the 20-trading day period ending on December 3, 2020.

Performance
Modifier
  TSR Hurdle  TSR % vs.
Baseline
Price

50%

  

$104.40

  

36%

100%

  

$119.40

  

55%

150%

  

$129.40

  

68%

200%

  

$144.40

  

88%

The HRCC believes that the TSR Hurdles were set at challenging levels, that require successful execution of our long-term strategy and the creation of significant incremental shareholder value.

From December 3, 2020 (the grant date of Mr. Dickerson’s award) through the last trading day of calendar 2021, Applied’s highest 20-day average closing stock price was $152.85 – above the maximum hurdle even before considering the impact of dividends paid to shareholders. This represents a stock price increase of 77.5% from the closing price on December 3, 2020 and an increase of approximately $57 billion in the Company’s market capitalization.

The chart below illustrates the TSR Hurdles corresponding to the 100% and 200% modifiers, compared to Applied’s stock trading history during the ten years preceding the grant date.

Value Creation Awards TSR Hurdles vs. Applied’s Stock Trading History

LOGO

Maximum: $144.40 TSR Hurdle Target: $119.40 TSR Hurdle Baseline Price 1 Highest 20-Day Average Prior to Nov-2020 AMAT Daily Closing Price Jan-2012 Jun-2014 Nov-2016 Apr-2019 $0 $10 $20 $30 $40 $50 $60 $70 $80 $90 $100 $110 $120 $130 $140$150

120-Day Average as of Dec-2020 when the awards were approved by the HRCC.

The HRCC views the Value Creation Awards as an important, non-recurring supplement to the ongoing compensation program and does not expect to grant any similar awards in the coming years.

Applied Materials, Inc.    41


Interim CFO Compensation Package

In September 2021, Mr. Halliday was appointed as the Company’s interim Chief Financial Officer. In determining Mr. Halliday’s compensation package for the role, the HRCC considered a number of factors, including the expected duration of Mr. Halliday’s service in the role (making long-term incentive awards an impractical component of compensation) and the competitive market for senior finance talent.

After considering these factors, the HRCC approved a compensation package for Mr. Halliday consisting of: base salary at an annual rate of $710,000; a target bonus of 135% of his base salary under the Bonus Plan prorated for his service as interim CFO; and a cash bonus of $2,000,000 to be paid to Mr. Halliday if he remains the Company’s interim CFO through the date on which a permanent CFO commences service with the Company or if his employment is earlier terminated by the Company without cause or as a result of his death or disability.

Role and Authority of the Human Resources and Compensation Committee

The HRCC has a written charter approved by the Board that specifies the HRCC’s duties and responsibilities, which is available on our website at:

http://www.appliedmaterials.com/files/hrcc_charter.pdf.company/investor-relations/governance-documents. In accordance with its charter, the HRCC oversees our programs that foster executive and employee development and retention, with an emphasis on leadership development, management capabilities, succession plans, company culture and human capital management. The HRCC also determines executive and director compensation, and oversees significant employee benefits programs, policies, and plans.

Each member of the HRCC has been determined to be independent under Nasdaq and SEC rules. The HRCC may delegate any of its responsibilities to subcommittees. See Board“Board Meetings and CommitteesCommittees” on page 1415 for more information about the HRCC.

Applied Materials, Inc.    37


Role of Compensation Consultant

The HRCC has the authority to engage independent advisors to assist it in carrying out its responsibilities. For fiscal 2019,2021, the HRCC engaged Semler Brossy Consulting Group (“Semler Brossy”) as its independent executive compensation consultant. Semler Brossy, who reports directly to the HRCC and not to management, is independent from Applied, has not provided any services to Applied other than to the HRCC, and

receives compensation from Applied only for services provided to the HRCC. The HRCC assessed the independence of Semler Brossy pursuant to SEC rules and concluded that the work of Semler Brossy for the HRCC has not raised any conflict of interest.

Semler Brossy reviews and advises on all principal aspects of the executive compensation program. Its main responsibilities are as follows:

 

  Advise on alignment of pay and performance;

 

  Review and advise on executive total compensation, including base salaries, short- and long-term incentives, associated performance goals, and retention and severance arrangements;

 

  Advise on trends in executive compensation;

 

  Provide recommendations regarding the composition of our peer group;

 

  Analyze market compensation practices based on peer group proxy statements, compensation survey data and other publicly available data; and

 

  Perform any special projects requested by the HRCC.

The HRCC typically asks Semler Brossy to attend the HRCC’s meetings, including executive sessions at which management is not present. Semler Brossy communicates regularly with the HRCC Chair outside of committee meetings and also meets with management to gather information and review proposals.

Role of Executive Officers and Management in Compensation Decisions

In fiscal 2019,2021, the HRCC invited Mr. Dickerson (as CEO) and other executives, including the heads of Global Human Resources and Global Rewards, to attend its meetings. The HRCC also regularly held executive sessions without management present. The CEO, together with the HRCC, assesses the performance of our NEOs and other executive officers. The CEO presents to the HRCC his evaluation of each executive officer’s performance over the past year and makes recommendations to the HRCC regarding base salaries, bonus targets and actual payments, performance goals and weightings, and long-term incentive awards for executive officers. The HRCC considers these recommendations in making its final determinations, in addition to considering input from Semler Brossy. The HRCC discusses the CEO’s proposed compensation and makes final decisions regarding the CEO’s compensation when he is not present.

 

42    2022 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

 

Additional Compensation Programs and Policies

 

 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Plan

Our 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”) allows our NEOs and other eligible employees to voluntarily defer on apre-tax basis a portion of their eligible earnings. We do not provide matching or other employer contributions to our executive officers under this plan. Deferrals made prior to October 2015 under the DCP are credited with deemed interest and are subject to the distribution rules in place prior to the plan amendment in October 2015. Beginning in fiscal 2016, participants are permitted to notionally invest new deferrals in certain investment options available under the plan. Additionally, for new deferrals, the DCP provides distribution rules forin-service distributions andor upon a qualifying separation from service, an elected future date, disability and change in control. See “Nonqualified Deferred Compensation” below for more information about the DCP.

Retirement Benefits under the 401(k) Plan and Generally AvailableOther Benefits Programs

During fiscal 2019,2021, all full-time and part-time (working 20 or more hours a week) U.S. employees, including the NEOs, were eligible to participate in Applied’s 401(k) plan, atax-qualified retirement plan. Eligible Applied 401(k) plan participants receive matching contributions from Applied. Other than the 401(k) plan, we do not provide defined benefit pension plans or defined contribution retirement plans to the NEOs or other employees, except as required in certain countries outside the U.S. for legal or competitive reasons. Applied offers a number of other benefits programs to a broad base of eligible employees, including atax-qualified employee stock purchase plan, medical, dental and vision insurance, long-term and short-term disability plans, life and accidental death and dismemberment plans, health and dependent care flexible spending accounts, business travel insurance, wellness programs, educational assistance, employee assistance program and certain other country-specific benefits.

38    2020 Proxy Statement


COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Applied annually benchmarks its overall benefits programs, including the 401(k) plan, against those of our peers. Applied’s overall broad-based benefits programs are at approximately theconsistent with market median,practice, which the HRCC believes allows us to remain competitive in attracting and retaining talent.

The safety and security of the Company’s CEO are important to Applied’s continued success. During fiscal 2021, the HRCC approved the installation of a residential security system and related monitoring and maintenance services, as well as ancillary personal security services, for Mr. Dickerson. While the costs of these services are required to be disclosed as compensation for Mr. Dickerson, we do not consider these security measures to be a personal benefit. The HRCC will

continue to review the nature and cost of any future security provided to Mr. Dickerson.

The value of the benefits provided under the programs discussed above are not considered by the HRCC in determining an individual NEO’s total compensation.

Relocation Program

Applied maintains a relocation program available to all eligible employees that is consistent with current practices among global companies. Applied provides competitive relocation benefits to ensure it can fill positions critical to its business needs and provide career development opportunities for high-potential employees. Benefits for employees on international assignment include reimbursement on anafter-tax basis for housing and transportation allowances and living and travel expense reimbursements. Benefits also include tax equalization that is intended to put employees who relocate in service to Applied in the same position, from atax-liability perspective, that they would be in if they were still located in the U.S.

In 2014, at the Board’s request, Mr. Dickerson relocated with his family to Japan to continue leading critical efforts toward the then-anticipated completion of a proposed business combination with Tokyo Electron Limited.

Board Rationale for Relocation. Recognizing the complexity of a U.S.-Japanese merger, including both geographic and cultural differences, the Board felt it was critical to have senior leadership presence from Applied on the ground in Japan to work closely with Tokyo Electron during the regulatory review period and to effect a smooth business combination and increase the likelihood of achieving forecasted business benefits of the merger. The Board considered and determined that the anticipated cost savings that would be generated from the merger would significantly outweigh the expenses to relocate Mr. Dickerson and his family to Japan.

Relocation Benefits. In accordance with our relocation program that is available to all employees on global assignment, the HRCC approved relocation benefits for Mr. Dickerson, which included amounts for taxes incurred in connection with the relocation, as well as tax equalization for the incrementaltax-liability resulting from his relocation to Japan in service of Applied.

Tax equalization ensures that the tax costs incurred by Mr. Dickerson on the international assignment be equivalent to what the tax costs would have been had he remained in the U.S. Tax payments were not paid to Mr. Dickerson but

were paid directly to the appropriate tax authorities. While the amounts of the relocation benefits are attributed to Mr. Dickerson in the Summary Compensation Table, they did not provide any additional compensation to him and are not part of his ongoing pay.

Disclosure and Payment Timing. Although Mr. Dickerson relocated to Japan for part of 2014 and 2015, the timing and disclosure of relocation payments extend beyond this period. Mr. Dickerson is subject to income taxes in Japan on income earned for the period of time of his international assignment, including continuing Japanese tax liabilities related to his equity awards. Japan assesses income tax on compensation earned while an individual is resident in Japan. Performance shares are deemed earned over the period during which they vest and stock options are deemed earned from grant to exercise. Applied, in connection with providing tax equalization benefits to Mr. Dickerson under the relocation program, is responsible for incremental taxes in connection with the vesting of performance shares and the stock option award upon its exercise.

Stock Ownership Guidelines

We have stock ownership guidelines to help align the interests of our Section 16 officers on the CEO Executive Staff with those of our shareholders. The guidelines provide that officers should meet the following ownership levels inof Applied common stock:

 

Position

  

Ownership Level

 

CEO

  

6x base salary

Other Officers

  

3x base salary

Unearned performance awards and unexercised options (or portions thereof) are not included for purposes of satisfying the guidelines. Officers may not sell any shares of Applied stock if their ownership would fall below the applicable guideline following the sale.

As of December 31, 2019, each officer was2021, all of our officers were in compliance with the stock ownership guidelines.

Hedging and Pledging Prohibitions

Applied has an insider trading policy that, among other things, prohibits all of our employees (including officers) and directors from engaging in hedging or other speculative transactions relating to Applied shares. Prohibited transactions include short sales, derivative securities (such as put and call options, or other similar instruments) and other hedging transactions (such as equity swaps, prepaid variable forwards, or similar instruments), or any transactions that have, or are designed to have, the effect of hedging or offsetting any decrease in the market value of Applied securities. In addition, Section 16 officers and directors are prohibited from holding Applied securities in a margin account or otherwise pledging Applied securities as collateral for a loan.

Applied Materials, Inc.    39


Clawback Policy

We have a “clawback” policy that allows the Board to require reimbursement of incentive compensation from an executive officer in the event that intentional misconduct by the officer is determined to be the primary cause of a material negative restatement of Applied’s financial results. The compensation that may be recovered is theafter-tax portion of any bonus

Applied Materials, Inc.    43


paid to, and any performance-based equity awards earned by, the NEO within the 12 months after filing of the financial statements, if the compensation would not have been paid to the NEO had Applied’s financial results been reported properly. The policy applies to financial statements filed in a rolling three-year,three- year, look-back period. This clawback policy is in addition to any policies or recovery rights that are required under applicable laws, including the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the Dodd-Frank Act.

Tax Deductibility

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended by the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017, restricts deductibility for federal income tax purposes of annual individual compensation in excess of $1 million to each NEO, effective for tax years beginning after 2017, subject to a transition rule for certain written binding contracts which were in effect on November 2, 2017, and which were not modified in any material respect on or after such date. In the past, Section 162(m)’s deductibility limitation was subject to an exception for compensation that qualified as ‘performance-based’. Our compensation programs were designed to permit Applied to qualify for the performance-based exception, although the Company reserved the right to pay compensation that did not qualify as ‘performance-based’. While the HRCC will continue to considerconsiders the deductibility of compensation as a factor in making compensation decisions, it retains the flexibility to provide compensation that is consistent with the Company’s goals for its executive compensation program, even if such compensation wouldis not be fullytax-deductible.

 

 

HUMAN RESOURCES AND

COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

 

 

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Applied specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act.

The Human Resources and Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis for fiscal 2019.2021. Based on the review and discussions, the Human Resources and Compensation

Committee recommended to the Board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in Applied’s Proxy Statement for its 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.

This report is submitted by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee.

Thomas J. Iannotti (Chair)

Xun (Eric) Chen

Alexander A. Karsner

 

 

40    2020 Proxy Statement

44    2022 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table for Fiscal 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019

 

The following table shows compensation information for fiscal 2019, 20182021, 2020 and 20172019 for our NEOs.

 

  Name and Principal Position

Year

Salary
($)

Bonus
($)(1)

Stock
Awards
($)(2)

Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)

All Other
Compensation
($)

Total

($)

  Gary E. Dickerson
  President and Chief Executive Officer

2019

2018

2017

1,024,808

1,000,000

1,000,000

—  

—  

—  

11,696,506

11,261,311

10,844,501

1,133,000

1,430,000

2,640,000

218,081

373,229

838,204

(4)

14,072,395

14,064,540

15,322,705

  Daniel J. Durn(5)
  Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer

2019

2018

2017

620,673

600,000

138,462

—  

250,000

500,000

3,931,029

5,329,659

5,421,909

580,078

471,900

—  

13,620

23,252

411,239

(6)

5,145,400

6,674,811

6,471,610

  Ali Salehpour
  Senior Vice President, Services, Display and Flexible Technology

2019

2018

2017

620,673

600,000

591,346

—  

—  

—  

3,931,029

3,610,485

3,868,486

411,750

588,060

1,060,290

12,730

15,824

12,058

(7)

4,976,182

4,814,369

5,532,180

  Prabu G. Raja(8)
  Senior Vice President, Semiconductor Products Group

2019

2018

2017

564,058

549,039

—  

—  

—  

—  

2,892,132

4,784,842

—  

430,948

522,720

—  

16,464

13,923

—  

(9)

3,903,602

5,870,524

—  

  Steve G. Ghanayem(8)
  Senior Vice President, New Markets and Alliances Group

2019

2018

2017

564,058

549,039

—  

—  

—  

—  

2,892,132

4,784,842

—  

497,543

432,878

—  

13,620

14,869

—  

(10)

3,967,353

5,781,628

—  

  Name and Principal Position Year  Salary
($)(1)
  Bonus
($)
  Stock
Awards
($)(2)
  Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
($)(3)
  All Other
Compensation
($)
  

Total

($)

 

  Gary E. Dickerson
  President and Chief Executive Officer

  

2021

2020

2019

 

 

 

  

1,049,808

1,030,000

1,024,808

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

31,710,469

14,299,176

11,696,506

 

 

 

  

2,039,400

1,786,406

1,133,000

 

 

 

  

465,882

179,405

218,081

(4) 

 

 

  

35,265,559

17,294,987

14,072,395

 

 

 

  Robert J. Halliday(5)
  Senior Vice President, Chief Financial   Officer

  2021   268,500   —     —     351,844   
57,872
(6) 
 
  678,216 

  Daniel J. Durn(7)
  Former Senior Vice President, Chief   Financial Officer

  

2021

2020

2019

 

 

 

  

681,635

625,000

620,673

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

9,932,231

4,459,552

3,931,029

 

 

 

  

—  

975,586

580,078

 

 

 

  

75,104

13,893

13,620

(8) 

 

 

  

10,688,970

6,074,031

5,145,400

 

 

 

  Prabu G. Raja
  Senior Vice President, Semiconductor   Products Group

  

2021

2020

2019

 

 

 

  

648,135

567,000

564,058

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

9,400,928

3,359,304

2,892,132

 

 

 

  

1,195,703

923,324

430,948

 

 

 

  

75,070

17,842

16,464

(9) 

 

 

  

11,319,836

4,867,470

3,903,602

 

 

 

  Ali Salehpour
  Senior Vice President, Services, Display
  and Flexible Technology

  

2021

2020

2019

 

 

 

  

653,942

625,000

620,673

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

4,501,365

4,247,422

3,931,029

 

 

 

  

974,152

774,984

411,750

 

 

 

  

74,396

16,194

12,730

(10) 

 

 

  

6,203,855

5,663,600

4,976,182

 

 

 

  Omkaram Nalamasu(11)
  Senior Vice President, Chief Technology   Officer

  2021   552,789   —     3,019,654   848,513   
63,916
(12) 
 
  4,484,872 

 

(1)

Amount shown for Mr. Durn (a) forApplied’s fiscal 2018 is a special bonus of $250,000, awarded to Mr. Durn in lieu of a2021 contained 53 weeks, and fiscal 2017 bonus as his employment occurred after the eligibility date for a 2017 bonus award under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan, which bonus was paid six months following Mr. Durn’s start date2020 and (b) for fiscal 2017 is anew-hire bonus of $500,000, had been subject to repayment by Mr. Durn if he resigned or his employment was terminated by Applied for cause within two years of his hire.2019 each contained 52 weeks.

(2)

Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the executive officer. Instead, the amounts reported represent the aggregate grant date fair value of target stock awards granted in the respective fiscal years, as determined pursuant to ASC 718 (but excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures for performance-based awards). For fiscal 2019,2021, the grant date fair value of the maximum number of stock awards that may be earned by each NEO iswas as follows: Mr. Dickerson: $20,564,903;$44,453,109; Mr. Durn: $5,940,053;$13,063,767; Dr. Raja: $12,357,270; Mr. Salehpour: $5,940,053;$5,985,380; and Dr. Raja: $4,370,210; and Mr. Ghanayem: $4,370,210.Nalamasu: $4,015,178. See Fiscal 2019“Fiscal 2021 Equity AwardsAwards” on page 3638 for more information regarding the stock awards.awards, including the non-recurring performance-based Value Creation Awards awarded to Mr. Dickerson, Mr. Durn and Dr. Raja during fiscal 2021. The assumptions used to calculate the value of awards are set forth in Note 1214 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Applied’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for fiscal 20192021 filed with the SEC on December 13, 2019.17, 2021.

(3)

Amounts consist of bonusespayouts earned under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan for services rendered in the respective fiscal years.

(4)

Amount includes (a) Applied’s matching contribution of $12,600$13,050 under thetax-qualified 401(k) Plan, (b) Applied’s payment on behalf of Mr. Dickerson of $1,020$1,068 in term life insurance premiums, (c) Applied’s matching contribution of $2,500 to an eligible non-profit organization pursuant to a program under the Applied Materials, Inc. Political Action Committee, to an eligiblenon-profit organization and (d) a payment of $500 under Applied’s Patent Incentive Award Program. Amount also includes $116,887$800 as reimbursement for internet and technology expenses, which payment was made to all U.S. employees working primarily from home during the COVID-19 pandemic, (e) a one-time lump-sum payment of $91,427 for accrued paid by Applied on behalf of Mr. Dickerson for tax consultation, $8,833 for taxes incurred and $75,741 of tax equalization payments for Japanese tax liabilities and taxes incurredtime off as a result of these payments made under Applied’s relocation program in connection with Mr. Dickerson’s international assignment in Japan in contemplation ofchange to a flexible time off policy for all U.S. exempt employees and (f) $357,036 for the closinginstallation of a proposed business combination with Tokyo Electron. Tax equalization ensures that the tax costs incurred by Mr. Dickerson on the international assignment are equivalent to what the tax costs would have been had he remained in the U.S. The tax equalization amounts were not paid to Mr. Dickerson but were paid directly to the appropriate tax authorities. See“Relocation Program” on page 39 for more information regarding Mr. Dickerson’s international assignment.residential security system and related monitoring services, as well as ancillary personal security services.

(5)

Mr. DurnHalliday was appointed CFOinterim Chief Financial Officer effective August 24, 2017.September 30, 2021, and prior to that he served as a corporate vice president of the Company. Mr. Halliday was not an NEO in fiscal 2020 or fiscal 2019.

(6)

Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of $12,600$11,408 under thetax-qualified 401(k) Plan, and (b) Applied’s payment on behalf of Mr. DurnHalliday of $1,020$89 in term life insurance premiums.premiums, (c) a payment of $800 as reimbursement for internet and technology expenses, which payment was made to all U.S. employees working primarily from home during the COVID-19 pandemic and (d) a one-time lump-sum payment of $45,935 for accrued paid time off as a result of Applied’s change to a flexible time off policy for all U.S. exempt employees.

(7)

Mr. Durn voluntarily terminated his employment with Applied effective October 15, 2021 and upon termination of his employment all of his previously awarded and unvested PSUs and RSUs were forfeited.

(8)

Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of $8,335$11,060 under thetax-qualified 401(k) Plan, (b) Applied’s payment on behalf of Mr. Durn of $1,068 in term life insurance premiums, (c) a payment of $800 as reimbursement for internet and technology expenses, which payment was made to all U.S. employees working primarily from home during the COVID-19 pandemic and (d) a one-time lump-sum payment of $62,176 for accrued paid time off as a result of Applied’s change to a flexible time off policy for all U.S. exempt employees.

(9)

Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of $12,256 under the tax-qualified 401(k) Plan, (b) Applied’s payment on behalf of Dr. Raja of $1,068 in term life insurance premiums, (c) a payment of $750 under Applied’s Patent Incentive Award Program, (d) Applied’s matching contribution of $2,500 to an eligible non-profit organization pursuant to a program under the Applied Materials, Inc. Political Action Committee, (e) a payment of $800 as reimbursement for internet and technology expenses, which payment was made to all U.S. employees working primarily from home during the COVID-19 pandemic and (f) a one-time lump-sum payment of $57,697 for accrued paid time off as a result of Applied’s change to a flexible time off policy for all U.S. exempt employees.

Applied Materials, Inc.    45


(10)

Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of $12,970 under the tax-qualified 401(k) Plan, (b) Applied’s payment on behalf of Mr. Salehpour of $1,020$1,068 in term life insurance premiums, (c) Applied’s matching contribution of $2,500 to an eligible non-profit organization pursuant to a program under the Applied Materials, Inc. Political Action Committee, to an eligiblenon-profit organization and (d) a payment of $875 under$800 as reimbursement for internet and technology expenses, which payment was made to all U.S. employees working primarily from home during the COVID-19 pandemic and (e) a one-time lump-sum payment of $57,058 for accrued paid time as a result of Applied’s Patent Incentive Award Program.change to a flexible time off policy for all U.S. exempt employees.

(8)(11)

Dr. Raja and Mr. Ghanayem were each designatedNalamasu was not an executive officer effective November 2017.NEO in fiscal 2020 or fiscal 2019.

(9)(12)

Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of $12,569$10,727 under thetax-qualified 401(k) Plan, (b) Applied’s payment on behalf of Dr. RajaNalamasu of $1,020$1,068 in term life insurance premiums, (c) a payment of $375 under Applied’s Patent Incentive Award Program and (d) Applied’s matching contribution of $2,500 to an eligible non-profit organization pursuant to a program under the Applied Materials, Inc. Political Action Committee, (d) a payment of $800 as reimbursement for internet and technology expenses, which payment was made to an eligibleall U.S. employees working primarily from home during the non-profitCOVID-19 organization.pandemic and (e) a one-time lump-sum payment of $48,820 for accrued paid time as a result of Applied’s change to a flexible time off policy for all U.S. exempt employees.

(10)

Amount consists of (a) Applied’s matching contribution of $12,600 under thetax-qualified 401(k) Plan and (b) Applied’s payment on behalf of Mr. Ghanayem of $1,020 in term life insurance premiums.

Applied Materials, Inc.    41


Grants of Plan-Based Awards for Fiscal 20192021

 

The following table shows all plan-based awards granted to the NEOs during fiscal 2019.2021.

 

Estimated Possible Payouts
UnderNon-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units

(#)

All Other
Option
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)

Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
($/share)

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards

($)(2)

   Name

Grant

Date

Threshold
($)

Target

($)

Maximum
($)

Threshold
(#)

Target

(#)

Maximum
(#)

  Gary E. Dickerson

12/6/2018

12/6/2018

—  

—  

—  

0

—  

—  

2,060,000

—  

—  

5,000,000

128,045

—  

—  

256,090

—  

—  

512,180

—  

—  

—  

85,364

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

8,868,397

2,828,109

—  

  Daniel J. Durn

12/6/2018

12/6/2018

—  

—  

—  

0

—  

—  

843,750

—  

—  

2,531,250

29,007

—  

—  

58,014

—  

—  

116,028

—  

—  

—  

58,014

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

2,009,025

1,922,004

—  

  Ali Salehpour

12/6/2018

12/6/2018

—  

—  

—  

0

—  

—  

843,750

—  

—  

2,531,250

29,007

—  

—  

58,014

—  

—  

116,028

—  

—  

—  

58,014

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

2,009,025

1,922,004

—  

  Prabu G. Raja

12/6/2018

12/6/2018

—  

—  

—  

0

—  

—  

765,450

—  

—  

2,296,350

21,341

—  

—  

42,682

—  

—  

85,364

—  

—  

—  

42,682

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

1,478,078

1,414,055

—  

  Steve G. Ghanayem

12/6/2018

12/6/2018

—  

—  

—  

0

—  

—  

765,450

—  

—  

2,296,350

21,341

—  

—  

42,682

—  

—  

85,364

—  

—  

—  

42,682

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

1,478,078

1,414,055

—  

     

 

Estimated Possible Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)

  

 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(2)

  

All Other
Stock
Awards:
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units

(#)

  

Grant
Date Fair
Value of
Stock and
Option
Awards

($)(3)

 
   Name 

Grant

Date

  Threshold
($)
  

Target

($)

  Maximum
($)
  Threshold
(#)
  

Target

(#)

  Maximum
(#)
 

  Gary E. Dickerson

  

12/3/2020

12/3/2020

12/3/2020

—  

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

0

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

1,545,000

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

4,635,000

 

 

 

 

  

61,085

—  

58,073

—  

 

 

 

 

  

122,169

—  

116,145

—  

 

 

 

 

  

244,338

—  

232,290

—  

 

 

 

 

  

—  

40,723

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

13,280,967

3,415,438

15,014,064

—  

 

 

(4) 

 

  Robert J. Halliday

  —     0   234,563   703,668   —     —     —     —     —   

  Daniel J. Durn(5)

  

12/3/2020

12/3/2020

12/4/2020

—  

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

0

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

958,500

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

2,875,500

 

 

 

 

  

13,793

—  

16,885

—  

 

 

 

 

  

27,585

—  

33,769

—  

 

 

 

 

  

55,170

—  

67,538

—  

 

 

 

 

  

—  

27,585

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

2,998,740

2,313,554

4,619,937

—  

 

 

(4) 

 

  Prabu G. Raja

  

12/3/2020

12/3/2020

12/4/2020

—  

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

0

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

877,500

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

2,632,500

 

 

 

 

  

12,413

—  

16,885

—  

 

 

 

 

  

24,826

—  

33,769

—  

 

 

 

 

  

49,652

—  

67,538

—  

 

 

 

 

  

—  

24,826

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

  

2,698,834

2,082,157

4,619,937

—  

 

 

(4) 

 

  Ali Salehpour

  

12/3/2020

12/3/2020

—  

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

0

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

870,750

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

2,612,250

 

 

 

  

11,687

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

23,374

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

46,748

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

—  

23,374

—  

 

 

 

  

2,540,988

1,960,377

—  

 

 

 

  Omkaram Nalamasu

  

12/3/2020

12/3/2020

—  

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

0

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

660,000

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

1,980,000

 

 

 

  

7,840

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

15,680

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

31,360

—  

—  

 

 

 

  

—  

15,680

—  

 

 

 

  

1,704,573

1,315,082

—  

 

 

 

 

(1)

Amounts shown were estimated possible payouts for fiscal 20192021 under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan.Plan (additional information on the annual bonus plan can be found on page 31 under “Annual Incentive Bonus Opportunities.”). These amounts were based on the individual NEO’s fiscal 20192021 base salary and position.target bonus as a percentage of base salary. The maximum amount shown is calculated as three times the target amount for the NEO, except the amount for Mr. Dickerson, which is the maximum amount payable per participant in any performance period under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan.NEO. Actual bonuses received by the NEOs for fiscal 20192021 under the Senior Executive Bonus Plan are reported in the Summary Compensation Table under the column titled“Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation.

(2)

Additional information on the equity awards can be found under “Fiscal 2021 Equity Awards” and “Value Creation Awards” on pages 38 and 39, respectively.

(3)

Amounts shown do not reflect compensation actually received by the NEOs. Instead, the amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the awards as determined pursuant to ASC 718 (but excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures for performance-based awards). The assumptions used to calculate the awards’ value are set forth in Note 1214 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Applied’s Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal 20192021 filed with the SEC on December 13, 2019.17, 2021.

(4)

Reflects non-recurring performance-based awards that only deliver value to participants if total shareholder return hurdles are met during the five-year performance period and only if participants continue their employment with Applied through the end of the performance period, as described in more detail under “Value Creation Awards” beginning on page 39.

(5)

Mr. Durn voluntarily terminated his employment with Applied effective October 15, 2021 and upon termination of his employment all of the awards shown were forfeited.

 

42    2020 Proxy Statement

46    2022 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal 20192021 Year-End

 

The following table shows all outstanding equity awards held by the NEOs at the end of fiscal 2019.2021.

 

  Option AwardsStock Awards(1) 
Name 

Number

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Exercisable

Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
(#)
Unexercisable
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
(#)
Option
Exercise
Price
($)
Option
Expiration
Date
Number
of Shares
or Units

of Stock
That

Have Not
Vested
(#)

  

Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That

Have Not
Vested
($)(2)

  

Equity
Incentive

Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or

Other
Rights
That Have
Not Vested
(#)

  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other Rights
That Have
Not Vested
($)(2)
 

Gary E. Dickerson

  

1,000,00028,455

—  38,876

40,723

—  

—  

—  

—  

(3) 

(4)

(5)


3,888,376

5,312,405

5,564,798

—  

—  

—  

—  


 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

256,090

174,942

122,169

116,145


(6)

(7)

(8)

(9)


—  

—  

—  

34,994,699

23,905,824

16,694,394

15,871,214


Robert J. Halliday

—  —  —  —  

Daniel J. Durn(10)

—  —  —  —  

Prabu G. Raja


8,877

14,228

19,004

24,826

—  

—  

—  

—  

(11)

(3)

(12)

(13)


1,213,042

1,944,256

2,596,897

3,392,473

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

42,682

28,505

24,826

33,769


(14)

(7)

(8)

(15)


—  

—  

—  

—  

5,832,495

3,895,208

3,392,473

4,614,534


Ali Salehpour


19,338

24,028

23,374

—  

—  

—  

(3)

(16)

(17)


2,642,538

3,283,426

3,194,057

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  58,014

—  36,041

—  23,374

 

 

 


15.06

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



9/1/2020

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

178,478

31,147

37,355

85,364

—  


(4)

(5)

(6)(18) 

(7) 


—  

9,944,794

1,735,511

2,081,421

4,756,482

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

280,316

168,096

256,090


(8) 

(9)

(10)


—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

15,619,208

9,366,309

14,269,335


Daniel J. Durn

  

—  

—  

—  

7,927,613

4,925,003

3,194,057


Omkaram Nalamasu


10,244

13,999

15,680

—  

—  

—  

(3)

(19)

(20)


1,399,843

1,912,963

2,142,672

—  

—  

—  

 

 

 

 

 

 

  

—  

—  

—  

—  30,731

—  20,998

—  15,680

 

 

 

(21)

(7)

(8)

  

—  

—  

—  

—  4,199,391

—  2,869,377

—  2,142,672

 


—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



29,808

19,490

72,908

58,014

—  

—  

(11)

(12)

(13)

(14)


1,660,902

1,085,983

4,062,434

3,232,540

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

33,535

29,235

58,014


(15)

(9)

(10)


—  

—  

—  

—  

1,868,570

1,628,974

3,232,540


Ali Salehpour


—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



49,578

22,149

23,908

58,014

—  

—  

(4)

(5)

(16)

(14)


2,762,486

1,234,142

1,332,154

3,232,540

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

66,446

35,861

58,014


(17)

(9)

(10)


—  

—  

—  

—  

3,702,371

1,998,175

3,232,540


Prabu G. Raja


—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



34,704

17,304

26,630

18,678

42,682

—  

(4)

(5)

(18)

(19)

(20)


1,933,707

964,179

1,483,824

1,040,738

2,378,241

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

51,911

28,016

42,682


(21)

(9)

(10)


—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

2,892,481

1,561,052

2,378,241


Steve G. Ghanayem


—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

—  



34,704

17,304

26,630

18,678

42,682

—  

(4)

(5)

(18)

(19)

(20)


1,933,707

964,179

1,483,824

1,040,738

2,378,241

—  



—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

51,911

28,016

42,682


(21)

(9)

(10)


—  

—  

—  

—  

—  

2,892,481

1,561,052

2,378,241


 

 

 

 

 

 

(1)

Stock awards consist of time-vesting restricted stock units (“RSUs”) and performance shares and PSUs,share units (“PSUs”), all of which will be converted into Applied common stock on aone-to-one basis upon vesting. All future vesting of shares is subject to the NEO’s continued employment with Applied through each applicable vestvesting date. See“Long-Term “Long-Term Incentives”on page 3537 for more information regarding these awards.

(2)

Market value was determined by multiplying the number of such shares by the closing price of Applied common stock of $55.72$136.65 on October 25, 2019,29, 2021, the last trading day of fiscal 2019,2021, as reported on the Nasdaq Global Select Market.

(3)

Mr. Dickerson exercised this stock optionRSUs were granted on December 6, 2018. These shares vested in full on NovemberDecember 19, 2019.2021.

(4)

Performance sharesRSUs were granted on December 7, 2015. These5, 2019. Of these, 19,438 shares vested on December 19, 2019.

(5)

Restricted stock units were granted on December 1, 2016. These shares vested on December 19, 2019.

(6)

Restricted stock units were granted on December 14, 2017. Of these, 18,677 shares vested on December 19, 20192021 and 18,67819,438 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2020.2022.

(7)(5)

Restricted stock unitsRSUs were granted on December 6, 2018.3, 2020. Of these, 28,45413,574 shares vested on December 19, 2019 and 28,4552021, 13,574 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, of each of 20202022 and 2021.13,575 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2023.

(8)(6)

PSUs were granted on December 1, 2016.6, 2018. These shares vested on December 19, 2019.2021. On December 5, 2019,2, 2021, an additional 155,576127,021 shares became eligible to vest due to achievement of performance goals related to the grant. These additional shares also vested on December 19, 2019.2021.

Applied Materials, Inc.    43


(9)(7)

PSUs were granted on December 14, 2017.5, 2019. The shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2020,2022, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. The number of shares shown is the target amount, and the actual number of shares that may vest ranges from 0% to 200% of the target amount, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals.

(10)(8)

PSUs were granted on December 6, 2018.3, 2020. The shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2021,2023, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. The number of shares shown is the target amount, and the actual number of shares that may vest ranges from 0% to 200% of the target amount, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals.

(11)(9)

Restricted stock unitsPSUs were granted on September 6, 2017. Of these, 11,178 shares vested on December 19, 2019 and 18,6303, 2020. The shares are scheduled to vest on February 1, 2020.October 26, 2025, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. The number of shares shown is the target amount, and the actual number of shares that may vest ranges from 0% to 200% of the target amount, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals.

Applied Materials, Inc.    47


(10)

Mr. Durn voluntarily terminated his employment with Applied effective October 15, 2021, and upon termination of his employment all of his previously awarded and unvested PSUs and RSUs were forfeited.

(11)

RSUs were granted on November 6, 2017. These shares vested in full on December 19, 2021.

(12)

Restricted stock unitsRSUs were granted on December 14, 2017.5, 2019. Of these, 9,7459,502 shares vested on December 19, 20192021 and 9,7459,502 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2020.2022.

(13)

Restricted stock units were granted on October 19, 2018. Of these, 24,302 shares vested on November 1, 2019 and 24,303 shares are scheduled to vest on November 1 of each of 2020 and 2021.

(14)

Restricted stock unitsRSUs were granted on December 6, 2018.3, 2020. Of these, 19,3388,275 shares vested on December 19, 2019 and 19,3382021, 8,275 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, of each of 20202022 and 2021.8,276 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2023.

(15)(14)

PSUs were granted on SeptemberDecember 6, 2017.2018. These shares vested on December 19, 2019.2021. On December 5, 2019,2, 2021, an additional 18,61221,171 shares became eligible to vest due to achievement of performance goals related to the grant. These additional shares also vested on December 19, 2019.2021.

(15)

PSUs were granted on December 4, 2020. The shares are scheduled to vest on October 26, 2025, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals. The number of shares shown is the target amount, and the actual number of shares that may vest ranges from 0% to 200% of the target amount, depending on the achievement of specified performance goals.

(16)

Restricted stock unitsRSUs were granted on December 14, 2017.5, 2019. Of these, 11,95412,014 shares vested on December 19, 20192021 and 11,95412,014 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2020.2022.

(17)

RSUs were granted on December 3, 2020. Of these, 7,791 shares vested on December 19, 2021, 7,791 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2022 and 7,792 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2023.

(18)

PSUs were granted on December 1, 2016.6, 2018. These shares vested on December 19, 2019.2021. On December 5, 2019,2, 2021, an additional 36,87828,775 shares became eligible to vest due to achievement of performance goals related to the grant. These additional shares also vested on December 19, 2019.2021.

(18)(19)

Restricted stock unitsRSUs were granted on November 6, 2017.December 5, 2019. Of these, 8,8776,999 shares vested on December 19, 2019, 8,8762021 and 7,000 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 20202022.

(20)

RSUs were granted on December 3, 2020. Of these, 5,226 shares vested on December 19, 2021 and 8,8775,227 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19 2021.

(19)

Restricted stock units were granted on December 14, 2017. Of these, 9,339 shares vested on December 19, 2019of each of 2022 and 9,339 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2020.

(20)

Restricted stock units were granted on December 6, 2018. Of these, 14,227 shares vested on December 19, 2019, 14,227 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2020 and 14,228 shares are scheduled to vest on December 19, 2021.2023.

(21)

PSUs were granted on December 1, 2016.6, 2018. These shares vested on December 19, 2019.2021. On December 5, 2019,2, 2021, an additional 28,81115,242 shares became eligible to vest due to achievement of performance goals related to the grant. These additional shares also vested on December 19, 2019.2021.

Option Exercises and Stock Vested for Fiscal 20192021

 

The following table shows all stock awards that vested and the value realized upon vesting for each NEO during fiscal 2019.2021.

 

  Option Awards   Stock Awards   Stock Awards 
Name  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise
(#)
   Value Realized
on Exercise
($)
   Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting
(#)(1)
   Value Realized
on Vesting
($)(2)
   

Number of Shares

Acquired on
Vesting

(#)(1)

   

Value Realized

on Vesting

($)(2)

 

Gary E. Dickerson

   —      —      367,532    11,588,284    246,770    21,244,429 

Robert J. Halliday

   —      —   

Daniel J. Durn

   —      —      39,553    1,392,047    97,339    7,727,136 

Prabu G. Raja

   71,977    6,196,500 

Ali Salehpour

   —      —      122,354    3,857,822    81,748    7,037,685 

Prabu G. Raja

   —      —      89,560    2,823,827 

Steve G. Ghanayem

   —      —      89,560    2,823,827 

Omkaram Nalamasu

   45,592    3,925,015 
(1)

Of the amounts shown in this column, Applied withheld the following number of shares to cover tax withholding obligations: 182,227122,351 shares for Mr. Dickerson; 20,91651,252 shares for Mr. Durn; 60,66634,015 shares for Dr. Raja; 38,846 shares for Mr. Salehpour; 43,930and 21,184 shares for Dr. Raja; and 44,406 shares for Mr. Ghanayem.Nalamasu.

(2)

Value realized equals the fair market value of Applied common stock on the vesting date, multiplied by the number of shares that vested.

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation

 

 

Applied’s 2016 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”), restated effective October 12, 2015 (the “Restatement Date”) and formerly known as the 2005 Executive Deferred Compensation Plan, is anon-qualified deferred compensation plan that allows eligible employees, including executive officers, to voluntarily defer receipt of all or a portion of their: (1) eligiblesign-on bonus payments, if any, (2) up to 40% of their base salaries (3)and all or a portion of their eligible sales incentive and annual

bonus payments, if any, and (4) eligible severance payments, if any.

Deferrals made prior to the restatement of the DCP in October 2015 (the “2015 Restatement DateDate”) are retained as separate “rollover” accounts under the DCP. These deferrals continue to be credited with deemed interest in the sum of

(a) theyield-to-maturity of five-year U.S. Treasury notes, plus (b) 1.50%. The deemed interest rate under the DCP for fiscal 2019 was 3.61% from October 29, 2018 to December 31,

44    2020 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

2018 and 4.32% from January 1, 2019 to October 27, 2019. Deferred amounts in the rollover accounts, plus deemed interest thereon, are generally payable on the same date selected by the participants or specified prior to the 2015 Restatement Date under the terms of the DCP. Beginning in fiscal 2016, deferrals under the DCP are credited with deemed investment returns, gains or losses based upon investment crediting options available under the DCP. Applied does not make any matching or other employer contributions to the plan for our executive officers.

48    2022 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Under the DCP, a change in control (as defined prior to the 2015 Restatement Date), would trigger the distribution of all deferred balances in the rollover accounts. For account balances after the 2015 Restatement Date, the DCP provides distribution rules forin-service and future date distribution options and upon a qualifying separation from service, disability and change in control, including the option to change the time and form of payment within three (3) months

following a change in control, as such term is defined in the DCP. Distributions are payable from the general assets of Applied or from the assets of a grantor trust (known as a rabbi trust) established by Applied.Applied for distributions made from accounts established after the 2015 Restatement Date and existing as of December 31, 2019, and their associated earnings.

 

 

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation for Fiscal 20192021

 

Name 

Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year

($)

 

Registrant
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year

($)

 Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal Year
($)(1)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
 Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year End
($)
  

Executive
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year

($)(1)

 

Registrant
Contributions in
Last Fiscal Year

($)

 Aggregate
Earnings in
Last Fiscal Year
($)(2)
 Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)
 Aggregate
Balance at Last
Fiscal Year  End
($)(3)
 

Gary E. Dickerson

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Robert J. Halliday

  —     —     —     —     —   

Daniel J. Durn

  —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —     —   

Prabu G. Raja

  1,081,518   —     179,232   —     6,965,464 

Ali Salehpour

  809,949   —     497,826   —     4,340,268   1,004,572   —     107,214   —     7,892,709 

Prabu G. Raja

  668,561   —     326,131   —     4,484,794 

Steve G. Ghanayem

  413,601   —     208,214   —     1,327,053 

Omkaram Nalamasu

  804,040   —     159,302   164,438   5,603,559 
(1)

ThereAmounts in this column are included in the Summary Compensation Table for fiscal 2021.

(2)

Amounts in this column are not included in the Summary Compensation Table because there were no above-market or preferential earnings for fiscal 2019.2021.

(3)

Amounts in this column represent the balances as of October 31, 2021 and include compensation already reported in the Summary Compensation Table above and in the Summary Compensation Table in prior years’ proxy statements, except for the earnings on contributions, which were not at above-market or preferential rates, and for contributions made when the individual was not a NEO.

Employment Agreement

 

 

Applied does not have employment agreements with any of its NEOs, other than an agreement with Mr. Dickerson. The agreement with Mr. Dickerson was entered into in connection with his appointment as President and CEO.

Mr. Dickerson’s employment agreement, dated August 14, 2013, provides that if Applied terminates his employment other than for cause and other than due to death or disability, he would be entitled to receive a lump sum payment equal to 275% of his base salary, provided that he executes an agreement containing a release of claims andnon-solicitation andnon-disparagement provisions in favor of Applied.

For purposes of Mr. Dickerson’s agreement, “cause” generally means the willful failure to perform his duties after written notice and an opportunity to cure; the willful commission of a wrongful act that caused, or was reasonably likely to cause, substantial damage to Applied, or an act of fraud in the performance of his duties; conviction for the commission of a felony in connection with the performance of his duties; or the order of a federal or state regulatory authority requiring the termination of his employment.

 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    45


Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change of Control

 

 

Applied does not currently have change of control agreements or arrangements with any of its NEOs.

Potential Payments Upon Termination. Under Mr. Dickerson’s employment agreement described above, he would have been entitled to receive $2,832,500 (275% of his annual base salary at the end of fiscal 2019)2021) had Applied terminated his employment without cause on October 25, 2019,29, 2021, the last business day of fiscal 2019.2021. No other NEO was entitledparty to receive severance payment under an employment agreement in effect on October 25, 2019.29, 2021 or

Vesting Accelerationentitled to receive severance payments under such an agreement.

Additionally, the Value Creation Awards granted to Mr. Dickerson and Dr. Raja in early fiscal 2021 provide for accelerated vesting in the event of involuntary termination of employment without cause (as defined under the Stock Plan). In the event of such a termination, the performance period for the Value Creation Awards would be deemed to end on the date of such termination and the number of shares that would

Applied Materials, Inc.    49


vest would be determined as of such date. The following table shows the amounts attributable to the accelerated vesting of the Value Creation Awards if Applied had terminated Mr. Dickerson’s or Dr. Raja’s employment, respectively, without cause on October 29, 2021, the last business day of fiscal 2021. See “Value Creation Awards” beginning on page 39 for more information regarding the awards.

Named Executive OfficerValue of Vesting
Acceleration of
Value Creation
Awards ($)(1)

Gary E. Dickerson

28,774,527

Prabu G. Raja

8,366,260
(1)

Amount based on the number of Value Creation Awards for which vesting would have been accelerated, calculated as (i) the target number of units awarded, (ii) multiplied by the 181.3% modifier that would have applied based on Applied’s absolute TSR achievement as of October 29, 2021 as compared to the program goals, (iii) multiplied by $136.65, the closing price of Applied common stock on October 29, 2021.

Qualified Retirement—Employee Stock Incentive Plan.PSU and RSU awards granted beginning in fiscal 2019 to certain of our NEOs are subject to retirement provisions which provide for partial accelerated vesting of RSU awards and a partial payout of the PSU awards based on actual performance at the conclusion of the three-year performance period, in the event of a qualifying retirement. In order to qualify, an executive is required to have reached age 60 and have completed at least five years of service with Applied, at the time of his or her retirement. As of the end of fiscal 2021, each of Mr. Dickerson, Dr. Nalamasu and Mr. Salehpour would have met the conditions for a qualifying retirement under these provisions. The following table shows the amounts attributable to a partial accelerated vesting of RSU awards and partial payout of PSU awards if the NEOs had incurred a qualifying retirement on October 29, 2021, the last business day of fiscal 2021. The retirement provision does not apply to the Value Creation Awards.

Named Executive Officer

Value of Partial RSU
Vesting Acceleration

and Partial PSU Payout
($)(1)

Gary E. Dickerson

63,307,166

Robert J. Halliday

—  

Daniel J. Durn

—  

Ali Salehpour

10,697,782

Prabu G. Raja

—  

Omkaram Nalamasu

10,882,168
(1)

Amount based on the number of RSUs for which vesting would have been accelerated and target number of PSUs which would have vested, multiplied by $136.65, the closing price of Applied common stock on October 29, 2021.

Change of Control—Employee Stock Incentive Plan. Our Stock Plan provides that the vesting of equity awards granted under the plan to employees, including the NEOs, will be accelerated in full upon a change of control of Applied if the successor corporation (or its parent or subsidiary) does not assume or provide a substitute for the outstanding awards. Separately, equity awards will be accelerated in full if the award holder is terminated without cause or resigns employment with Applied for good reason, in each case, within 12 months following a change of control of Applied.Applied and as defined under the Stock Plan or the applicable award agreement. This double-trigger accelerated vesting does not apply if the applicable award agreement specifically states

that it will not apply or if the participant’s employment is terminated due to his or her death or disability, resignation without good reason or termination for cause.

The following table shows the amounts attributable to the accelerated vesting of equity awards under the Stock Plan following a change of control in which the awards are not assumed or substituted, for, or within 12 months following a change of control in which the NEO is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, in each case assuming the change of control and termination or resignation occurred on October 25, 2019,29, 2021, the last business day of fiscal 2019.2021.

 

Named Executive Officer  Value of Vesting Acceleration
($)(1)
 

Gary E. Dickerson

   57,773,059106,231,710 

Robert J. Halliday

—  

Daniel J. Durn

   16,771,943—   

Ali Salehpour

   17,494,40825,166,694 

Prabu G. Raja

   14,632,46226,881,378 

Steve G. GhanayemOmkaram Nalamasu

   14,632,46214,666,918 
(1)

Amount based on the number of performance shares and restricted stock unitsRSUs and target number of PSUs    for which vesting would have been accelerated, multiplied by $55.72,$136.65, the closing price of Applied common stock on October 25, 2019.29, 2021.

 

50    2022 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

CEO Pay Ratio

 

 

SEC Required Pay Ratio. In accordance with SEC rules, we are providing the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO, to the median of the annual total compensation of our employees (other than the CEO). The fiscal 20192021 annual total compensation of our CEO, Mr. Dickerson, was $14,072,395,$35,265,559, the fiscal 20192021 annual total compensation of our median compensated employee (other than the CEO) was $104,500,$109,304, and the ratio of these amounts was 135323 to 1.

This pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules based on our human resources system of record and the methodology described below. Because the SEC rules for identifying the median compensated employee and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to the pay ratio reported above, as other companies may have different employment and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates, and assumptions in calculating their own pay ratios.

As permitted underSupplemental Pay Ratio without Value Creation Award. In addition to the SEC rules,required pay ratio, we are usingproviding a supplemental pay ratio that excludes from our CEO’s compensation the same median employee identified$15,014,064 grant date fair value of the Value Creation Award granted to him in early fiscal 2021. Because the Value Creation Awards are not expected to be

made in subsequent years and are not representative of ongoing compensation, we believe it is useful to also provide the pay ratio without the Value Creation Award. The terms of and rationale for purposesgranting the Value Creation Award to our CEO are discussed under “Value Creation Awards” beginning on page 39.

For fiscal 2021, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our 2018 CEO pay ratio, as we believewithout the changesValue Creation Award to the annual total compensation of our median compensated employee population and compensation have not significantly impacted our ratio. was 185 to 1.

For purposes of identifying our median compensated employee, last year, we used our global employee population as of October 28, 2018,31, 2021, the last day of fiscal 2018,2021, identified based on our human resources system of record. We used total direct compensation as our consistently applied compensation measure for such population. In this context, total direct compensation means the sum of the applicable annualized base salary determined as of October 28, 2018,31, 2021, the annual incentive earned for service in fiscal 2018,2021, and the approved value of the annual equity awards granted during fiscal 2018,2021, not includingoff-cycle grants in the case of new hires, promotions, or similar circumstances. Given itsthe Company’s global population, the Companywe used the average foreign currency exchange rates during the fiscal year for salary and the rates in effect at the end of fiscal 20182021 for the salary and the annual incentive. After identifying our median compensated employee, we then calculated the annual total compensation for our median compensated employee using the same methodology used for our CEO as set forth in the Summary Compensation Table of this Proxy Statement.proxy statement.

 

46    2020 Proxy Statement


EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

 

 

Applied’s Audit Committee is responsible for the review, approval, or ratification of “related person transactions” involving Applied or its subsidiaries and related persons. Under SEC rules, a related person is a director, officer, nominee for director, or 5% shareholder of a company since the beginning of the previous fiscal year, and his or hertheir immediate family members. Applied has adopted written policies and procedures that apply to any transaction or series of transactions in which (1) Applied or a subsidiary is a participant, (2) the amount involved exceeds $120,000 and (3) a related person has a direct or indirect material interest.

In accordance with these policies and procedures, the Audit Committee determines whether the related person has a material interest in a transaction and may, in its discretion, approve, ratify, or take other action with respect to the transaction. The Audit Committee reviews all material facts related to the transaction and takes into account, among other factors it deems appropriate, whether the transaction is on terms no less favorable than terms generally available to

an unaffiliated third party under the same or similar circumstances, the extent of the related person’s interest in the transaction, and the purpose and the potential benefits to Applied of the transaction.

In addition, the Audit Committee has delegated authority to the Chair of the Audit Committee to review and approve transactions in accordance with specified criteria, if advance review by the Audit Committee is not feasible. Any

transactions approved by the Chair must be reported to the Audit Committee at its next regularly-scheduledregularly scheduled meeting.

The Audit Committee has adopted standingpre-approvals for limited transactions with related persons.Pre-approved transactions are as follows:

 

 Any transaction with another company with which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee, director, or beneficial owner of less than 10% of that company’s shares, if the aggregate amount involved does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of that company’s total annual revenues;

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    51


 Any charitable contribution, grant, or endowment by Applied or The Applied Foundation to a charitable organization, foundation, or university with which a related person’s only relationship is as an employee (other than an executive officer) or a director, if the amount involved does not exceed the lesser of $1 million or 2% of the charitable organization’s total annual receipts;

 

 Compensation to executive officers or directors that has been approved by the Human Resources and Compensation Committee;

 Transactions in which all shareholders receive proportional benefits or where the rates or charges involved are determined by competitive bids; and

 

 Banking-related services involving a bank depository of funds, transfer agent, registrar, trustee under a trust indenture, or similar service.
 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    47

52    2022 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

We are asking shareholders to ratify the appointment of KPMG LLP (“KPMG”) as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal 2020,2022, which began on October 28, 2019November 1, 2021 and will end on October 25, 2020.30, 2022. The Audit Committee and the Board believe that the retention of KPMG to serve as ourthe Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is in the best interests of the Company and its shareholders. Although ratification is not legally required, Applied is submitting the appointment of KPMG to ourits shareholders for ratification as a matter of good corporate governance. In the event that this appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee of the Board will reconsider the appointment. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee, in its discretion, may change the appointment at any time during the fiscal year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interest of the Company and its shareholders.

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention, oversight, evaluation and, when appropriate, replacement of the independent registered public accounting firm that serves as the Company’s independent accountants. KPMG has served as

our independent registered public accounting firm since 2004. In selecting the independent auditor, the Audit Committee annually considers many factors, including its qualifications and performance during fiscal 20192021 and 2018,2020, its independence and tenure as the Company’s auditor; KPMG’s capability and expertise in handling the breadth and complexity of the Company’s global operations, including the expertise and capability of the lead audit partner; historical and recent performance, including the extent and quality of KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee; Public Company Accounting Oversight Board inspection reports, and the appropriateness of KPMG’s fees for audit andnon-audit services. Further, in conjunction with ensuring the rotation of KPMG’s lead engagement partner, the Audit Committee and its Chair are directly involved with the selection of KPMG’s lead engagement partner. The next mandatory rotation for KPMG’s lead engagement partner is scheduled to occur in fiscal year 2024.

Representatives of KPMG will be present at the Annual Meeting. They will be given an opportunity to make a statement if they wish and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

 

 

Fees Paid to KPMG LLP

 

 

The following table shows fees paid by Applied for professional services rendered by KPMG for fiscal 20192021 and 2018,2020, which ended on October 27, 201931, 2021 and October 28, 2018,25, 2020, respectively. All of the fees shown in the table were approved by the Audit Committee in accordance with itspre-approval process.

 

Fee Category

  

Fiscal 2019

 

   

Fiscal 2018

 

   Fiscal 2021   Fiscal 2020 
  

 

(In thousands)

 

   (In thousands) 

Audit Fees

   

 

$6,530

 

 

 

   

 

$7,776

 

 

 

  $6,500   $6,839 

Audit-Related Fees

  

 

 

 

 

57

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

342

 

 

 

 

   67    111 

Tax Fees:

         

 

   

 

Tax Compliance and Review

  

 

 

 

 

585

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

644

 

 

 

 

   396    601 

Tax Planning and Advice

  

 

 

 

 

187

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

236

 

 

 

 

   94    275 

All Other Fees

  

 

 

 

 

—  

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

50

 

 

 

 

   11    75 

Total Fees

  

 

 

 

 

$7,359

 

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

$9,048

 

 

 

 

  $7,068   $7,901 

Audit Fees consisted of fees for (a) professional services rendered for the annual audit of Applied’s consolidated financial statements, (b) review of the interim consolidated financial statements included in quarterly reports and (c) services that are typically provided by an independent registered public accounting firm in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-Related Fees included fees for assurance and related services that were reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of Applied’s consolidated financial statements and are not reported under “Audit Fees.” Audit-related fees also included fees incurred for services in connection with compliance with government-funded grant requirements and audits of financial statements of certain employee benefit plans and accounting consultations related to proposed new accounting standards.plans.

Tax Fees consisted of fees for professional services for tax compliance and review, and tax planning and advice. Tax compliance and review services consisted of federal, state, and international tax compliance, assistance with tax audits and appeals, and assistance with customs and duties audits. Tax planning and advice services consisted of consultations related to tax compliance matters and certain international operations.

All Other Fees for fiscal 2018 consisted of fees for services in connection with a contract compliance audit.audit and consultations regarding an employee benefit plan.

The Audit Committee has concluded that the provision of thenon-audit services described above was compatible with maintaining the independence of KPMG.

 

 

 ✓ 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG AS APPLIED’S INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL 20202022

 

 

48    2020 Proxy Statement

Applied Materials, Inc.    53


PROPOSAL 3—RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

Policy on Audit Committee’sPre-Approval of Audit and PermissibleNon-Audit Services of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

 

The Audit Committee reviews and, as appropriate,pre-approves all audit and permissiblenon-audit services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, and tax services, as well as specifically designatednon-audit services which, in the opinion of the Audit Committee, will not impair the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm.Pre-approval generally is provided for up to one year, and anypre-approval is detailed as to the particular service or category of services

and generally is subject to a specific budget. The independent registered public accounting firm and Applied’s management are required to periodically report to the Audit Committee regarding the extent of services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with thispre-approval, including the fees for the services performed to date. In addition, the Audit Committee also maypre-approve particular services on acase-by-case basis, as necessary or appropriate.

 

 

Audit Committee Report

 

 

The information contained in this report shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or “filed” with the SEC, or subject to the liabilities of Section 18 of the Exchange Act, except to the extent that Applied specifically incorporates it by reference into a document filed under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act.

Composition. The Audit Committee of the Board is composed of the directors named below. Each member of the Audit Committee meets the independence and financial experience requirements under applicable SEC rules and Nasdaq listing standards. In addition, the Board has determined that each of Judy Bruner, Adrianna C. Ma, Yvonne McGill, and Scott A. McGregor and Dennis D. Powell is an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by SEC rules.

Responsibilities. The Audit Committee operates under a written charter that has been adopted by the Board. The charter is reviewed annually for changes, as appropriate. The Audit Committee is responsible for general oversight of Applied’s auditing, accounting and financial reporting processes, system of internal control over financial reporting, and tax, legal, regulatory, and ethical compliance. Applied’s management is responsible for: (a) maintaining Applied’s books of account and preparing periodic financial statements based thereon; and (b) maintaining the system of internal control over financial reporting. The independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing Applied’s annual consolidated financial statements.

 

Review with Management and Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.Firm. The Audit Committee hereby reports as follows:

 

1.

The Audit Committee has reviewed and discussed with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP (“KPMG”), together and separately, Applied’s audited consolidated financial statements contained in Applied’s Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal year 2019.2021.

 

2.

The Audit Committee has discussed with KPMG matters required to be discussed by applicable standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

 

3.

The Audit Committee has received from KPMG the written disclosures and the letter required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board regarding KPMG’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence, and has discussed with KPMG its independence.

Based on the review and discussions referred to in paragraphs1-3 above, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board, and the Board has approved, that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in Applied’s Annual Report on Form10-K for fiscal year 20192021 for filing with the SEC.

The Audit Committee appointed KPMG as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 20202022 and recommends to shareholders that they ratify the appointment of KPMG as Applied’s independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020.2022.

This report is submitted by the Audit Committee.

Dennis D. Powell (Chair)

Judy Bruner

Stephen R. Forrest (Chair)

Adrianna C. Ma

Yvonne McGill

Scott A. McGregor

 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    49

54    2022 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 4—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING

PROPOSAL 4—APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ALLOW SHAREHOLDERS TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENTSHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING

 

We are asking shareholders to approve an amendmentKenneth Steiner, whose address and restatement of our Amended Certificate of Incorporation (the “Certificate”) to allow shareholder actionstockholding will be provided by written consent (the “Proposed Amendment”).

Background

Currently, Article SEVENTH of our Certificate prohibits shareholder action by written consent. We received aus upon request, has submitted the following proposal. The shareholder proposal for last year’s annual meeting requesting thatwill be voted on at the Board take the necessary steps to allow shareholders to act2022 Annual Meeting only if properly presented by written consent (the “2019 Proposal”). The 2019 Proposal did not pass because it failed to gain the support of a majorityor on behalf of the shares present atproponent.

Applied is not responsible for the meeting and entitled to vote: it won the support of 49.8%accuracy or content of the shares present atproposal and supporting statement, which are presented below as received from the meeting and entitled to vote, representing approximately 35.3% of our outstanding shares.proponent.

Last year, based on shareholder input and concerns about potential for abuse and shareholder disenfranchisement associated with action by written consent, the Board opposed the 2019 Proposal. However, after careful consideration of the voting results of the 2019 Proposal and recent shareholder feedback, as well as a comprehensive review of market practice and procedural safeguards adopted by other companies with respect to a shareholder right to act by written consent, the Board has declared advisable, and is submitting to shareholders for their approval, the Proposed Amendment, which would allow shareholder action by written consent. Our Board has taken a thoughtful approach to action by written consent and believes it is in the best interests of the Company and shareholders to adopt action by written consent with procedural safeguards. The Proposed Amendment addresses shareholder and Board concerns regarding written consent through specific procedural safeguards, described below, that are designed to ensure accountability and a democratic process for all shareholders.THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

Shareholder EngagementProposal

Proposal 4 – Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement

Shareholders ask our board to take the steps necessary to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of a combined 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareowner meeting.

Since Applied Materials management will not give its shareholders a genuine right to act by written consent we need the right for 10% of shares to be able to call a special shareholder meeting.

Applied Materials shareholders gave 49% support to a shareholder proposal to give shareholders the right to act by written consent. This 49% support represented clear majority support from the shares that have access to impendent proxy voting advice. In response to this majority support management gave us a useless right to act by written consent. This was under the “leadership” of Ms. Judy Bruner, who chaired the Governance Committee.

Management said that it would be mandatory to have the backing of 20% of all shares in existence to do so little as to ask for record date to start the written consent process. Why would any group of shareholders, who own 20% of our company, find it attractive to do so little as to ask management to look a calendar and name a date when these same owners of 20% of our company could compel management to hold a special shareholder meeting.

Door number one is management looks at a calendar and names a date.

Door number two is management is compelled to hold a special shareholder meeting.

What group of shareholders who own 20% of our company, in their right mind, would choose door number one?

To make up for our lack of a real right to act by written consent we need the right of 10% of shares to call for a special shareholder meeting.

Certain companies, that do not provide for a shareholder right to act by written consent, have a more reasonable stock ownership threshold to call for a special shareholder meeting.

Southwest Airlines is an example of a company that does not provide for shareholder written consent and yet provides for 10% of shares to call for a special shareholder meeting.

Special meetings allow shareholders to vote on important matters, such as electing new directors with special expertise or independence that may be lacking in our current directors as was the case with the 3 new Exxon directors supported by Engine No. 1 hedge fund in 2021.

Our management is best served by providing the means for 10% of shareholders, who have special expertise, to bring emerging opportunities or solutions to problems to the attention of management and all shareholders.

Also shareholder engagement is a toothless way to introduce new ideas to management. And management can abruptly discontinue or drastically restructure any shareholder engagement program if it fails to give mostly cheerleading feedback to management. Plus we do not have a requirement for independent board chairman which is another means to bring new ideas to management.

Please vote yes:

Special Shareholder Meeting Improvement – Proposal 4

LOGO

FOR Shareholder Rights

NOTE: The graphic above was submitted as part of the shareholder’s proposal.

Applied Materials, Inc.    55


OurBoard of Directors Statement in Opposition

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 4 for the following reasons:

The Board is committed to strong corporate governance practices and responsiveness to Applied’s shareholders andthrough regular dialogue. The Board also believes in maintaining policies and practices that serve the best interests of all shareholders. Shareholder input has been and continuesIn addition to be an important consideration in our Board’s dialogue around our corporate governance policies and practices. We have a strong historythe existing ability of taking proactive steps in response to our shareholders’ feedback to endeavor to establishbest-in-class governance and compensation structures.

Given the high level of support for the 2019 Proposal andshareholders holding at the direction of our Governance Committee, we engaged in extensive shareholder outreach to hear directly from our shareholders on their views on shareholder action by written consent, as well as our existing special meeting process. We contacted the holders of approximately 57% of our outstanding shares. Of those we contacted, 20 shareholders spoke with us, representing approximately 46%least 20% of our outstanding shares and consisting of common stock to call a roughly equal number ofspecial meeting, Applied’s shareholders who voted for and againsthave meaningful shareholder rights: the 2019 Proposal. Our independent Chairman of the Board and our independent Chair of the Governance Committee participated in several of these calls. Our Board has used this feedback to inform boardroom discussions in determining what action to take in response to the high support level for and shareholder input regarding action by written consent.

Shareholder Feedback

Many of the shareholders with whom we engaged expressed the view that the rightability to act by written consent, was unnecessarypropose actions for consideration at annual meetings, and nominate directors through proxy access. Following careful review and consideration, the Board has determined that support for this shareholder proposal is unwarranted and not in lightthe best interests of our existing corporate governance policies and shareholder rights, includingApplied or its shareholders. The Board continues to believe that 20% ownership is the appropriate threshold for the right to call a special meetings. Nevertheless, they encouraged usmeeting.

Applied shareholders already have a meaningful right to be responsive to the voting results of the 2019 Proposal.call a special meeting

A majority of these shareholders (16 of the 20 shareholders we spoke with, representing holders of approximately 40% of our outstanding shares) were supportive of the Board’s adoption ofThe Board acknowledges that a shareholder right to act by written consent. Most also expressed concerns that the written consent process could be subject to abuse absent adequate procedural safeguards, and expected that we would adopt such safeguards or were otherwise supportive of us doing so. Among those 16 shareholders, three, while supporting the Company’s adoption of action by written consent, expressedcall a preference for reducing the ownership threshold for the shareholder right to call special meetings in lieu of adopting shareholder action by written consent. However, there was no consensus among our shareholders regarding the appropriate ownership threshold and some shareholders noted concern about setting the threshold too low. The other four shareholders we spoke with, representing holders of approximately 6% of our outstanding shares, did not express a preference for either approach.

Regarding the procedural safeguards, the universal view among the 16 shareholders that supported the Board’s adoption of action by written consent was that we should adopt provisions that are consistent with market practice to

50    2020 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 4—APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ALLOW SHAREHOLDERS TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENT

prevent abuse and that aligning those provisions with our special meeting right (including the requisite ownership threshold) was an appropriate approach.

Board’s Decision and Rationale

The Board believes that Applied’s existing special meeting right provides Applied’s shareholders with a meaningful ability to propose actions for shareholder consideration between annual meetings. However, given the strong support for the 2019 Proposal and the shareholder feedback we received, the Board recognizes that the right of shareholders to act by written consent at an appropriate threshold may provideserves as an effective balance between ensuring the Board’s accountability to shareholders and enabling the Board and management to operate in an effective manner,manner. Our Bylaws currently permit the shareholders of 20% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company to call special meetings. The Board believes that our current 20% ownership threshold strikes a reasonable and appropriate balance between providing shareholders with the ability to call a special meeting while protecting the Company against the risk that a relatively small number of shareholders, including those with special interests, could call special meetings to pursue matters that may providenot reflect the interests of the Company and a complementary mechanismbroader group of shareholders, with the resulting expense and disruption to our business.

When the Company implemented the right for shareholders to raisecall a special meeting in 2015, the Board considered (1) the feedback from our extensive shareholder outreach, (2) our concentrated shareholder base and (3) benchmarking data of S&P 500 companies and our comparable peer companies incorporated in Delaware. We continue to give significant weight to these factors and after considering them again believe that the existing 20% threshold continues to be appropriate in light of these factors.

As of December 2021, two of our largest shareholders together hold more than 10% of our outstanding shares, and three of our largest shareholders together hold approximately 20% of our outstanding shares. Given this composition, reducing the ownership threshold to 10% could enable just a

small minority of shareholders to trigger the expense and disruption of a special meeting. It would also allow such shareholders to pursue narrow self-interests that are not widely viewed among our shareholder base as requiring immediate attention or that are not aligned with the long-term interests of the Company or our shareholders more broadly.

The Company’s current 20% ownership threshold continues to be lower than that of many other companies. As of December 2021, of the U.S. companies in the S&P 500 that permit their shareholders to call special meetings, a majority set the ownership threshold at or above 25%. Moreover, as of 2021, the current 20% ownership threshold is the same as, or more favorable to shareholders than, the special meeting rights at approximately 68% of the 486 S&P 500 companies surveyed by FactSet and that have also implemented a special meeting right. In addition, of our comparable peer companies incorporated in Delaware, over 75% either have not implemented the right to call a special meeting at all, or have done so at or above a 20% ownership threshold.

In 2020, Applied proposed for shareholders’ consideration, and shareholders approved, the right for shareholders to act by written consent at a 20% ownership threshold. In advance of this management proposal, Applied engaged in extensive shareholder outreach to hear directly from our shareholders about their views on shareholder action by written consent, including the appropriate ownership threshold. We engaged with holders representing approximately 46% of our outstanding shares and discussed reducing the threshold for calling a special meeting in lieu of implementing action by written consent. The universal view among all of our shareholders who supported adopting action by written consent was that setting the threshold at 20% for both the rights of shareholders to call a special meeting and to act by written consent was appropriate. This is consistent with shareholder feedback received in 2015 when we initially added the right to call a special meeting. Of the holders of over 32% of our outstanding shares with whom we engaged, over 95% supported the implementation of the special meeting right at a 20% ownership threshold, instead of at 10%.

Special meetings require substantial resources

For a company as large and complex as Applied, a special meeting of shareholders, regardless of whether the meeting is held in person or virtually, is a significant undertaking and in our view should occur only when fiduciary obligations or strategic concerns require that matters be addressed expeditiously. Preparing and conducting a special meeting creates significant distraction for the Board and the management team from their focus on maximizing long-term financial returns, achieving the Company’s long-term strategic objectives and operating Applied’s business. Given the size

56    2022 Proxy Statement


PROPOSAL 4—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING

of the Company’s shareholder base, a special shareholder meeting would require a substantial commitment of time, effort and resources by the Company, the Board and senior management to prepare for and conduct the meeting.

Special meetings should be limited to circumstances where a meaningful representation of our shareholders believes that a matter is sufficiently urgent or extraordinary that it must be addressed between annual meetings. To ensureGiving holders of as little as 10% of our outstanding shares the unlimited power to call a special meeting would permit a small minority of shareholders to use the extraordinary measure of calling a special meeting to serve their narrow self-interest at the expense of the majority of our shareholders and Applied, and opens the door to potential abuse and waste of corporate resources.

Therefore, the Board continues to believe that maintaining the written consent process provides our20% ownership threshold preserves a reasonable and appropriate balance between providing shareholders with a similarly equitableright to call a special meeting while protecting against distraction and transparent mannerunnecessary waste of corporate resources, and the disruption associated with convening a special meeting.

Current strong corporate governance practices demonstrate accountability and responsiveness

The Board further believes that Applied’s strong corporate governance practices make adoption of this proposal unnecessary. Many of our current shareholder rights, including our special meeting right, were informed by shareholder input received through our robust year-round engagement program. Applied’s corporate governance practices provide transparency and accountability of the Board to raise matters for consideration byall Applied shareholders, and ensure that Applied is responsive to address many of our shareholders’shareholder concerns, thatwithout the written consent process could be subject to abuse absent adequate procedural safeguards, the Proposed Amendment includes the following safeguards:additional expense and risk associated with a lower special meeting threshold:

 

 To ensure that shareholders who have limited support for their proposed action do not causeSpecial Meeting Right. Applied to incur unnecessary expense and disruption by a written consent solicitation,implemented the Proposed Amendment requires that shareholders seeking to act by written consent must own at least 20%right of our outstanding shares of common stock to request that the Board set a record date to determine the shareholders entitled to act by written consent. Similar to the requirement for shareholders to requestcall a special meeting these shares must be “Owned” by thosebased on feedback we received following extensive shareholder outreach, where 95% of shareholders as that term is defined in Applied’s bylaws.with whom we engaged supported the implementation of the right at a 20% ownership threshold, instead of at 10%.

This 20% threshold is the ownership threshold required for shareholders to call a special meeting. The Board believes that the same threshold is appropriate for shareholder action by written consent, so that a limited group of shareholders cannot use written consent to push forward an action that would lack sufficient shareholder support to merit calling a special meeting. The Board believes the 20% threshold strikes a suitable balance between enhancing the ability of shareholders to initiate shareholder action and limiting the risk of subjecting shareholders to numerous written consent solicitations (or special meeting requests) that may only be relevant to particular constituencies.

 

 To protect againstAction by Written Consent. We again engaged in extensive shareholder disenfranchisement,outreach in 2019 and added the right for shareholders seeking to act by written consent must solicit written consent from all shareholders entitled to vote on the matter to enable all shareholders to consider and act onat a proposal. This protection eliminates the possibility that a small group of shareholders could act without a democratic process for determining the merits of any20%
  

proposed actionownership threshold. This was consistent with universal shareholder feedback we received that setting the threshold at 20% for both the rights of shareholders to call a special meeting and without input from all our shareholders.to act by written consent was appropriate.

 

 To ensure transparency, shareholders requesting action by written consent must provideProxy Access for Director Nominations. Applied withhas a proxy access bylaw that allows any shareholder (or group of up to 20 shareholders) owning 3% or more of our common stock continuously for at least three years, to nominate and include in our proxy statement director nominees constituting up to 20% of the same information that would be required to propose that actionBoard (or at an annual or special shareholder meeting or nominate a candidate for director.least two director nominees).

 

 To provide theAnnual Election of Board of Directors. All of Applied’s directors are elected annually by shareholders, and shareholders can remove directors with a reasonable timeframe to properly evaluate and respond to a shareholder request to set record date for written consent, the Proposed Amendment requires that the Board must adopt a resolution fixing a record date by the later of (i) 20 days after delivery of the request and (ii) five days after delivery by the shareholder(s) of any additional information required by Applied to determine the validity of the request or to determine whether the proposed action to which the request relates may be effected by written consent. The record date must be no more than ten days after the date on which the Board resolution fixing the record date is adopted. If the Board fails to set a record date by the required date for a request that is valid, properly delivered and relating to an action that may be effected by written consent, the record date will be the first date on which a signed written consent relating to the proposed action is delivered to Applied.without cause.

 

 To ensure that shareholders have sufficient time to considerMajority Voting Standard. Applied has adopted a majority voting standard for the proposal and any statementselection of directors in opposition, as well as to provide the Board the opportunity to present its views regarding the proposed action, no executed consents may be delivered until 60 days after the delivery of a valid request to set a record date. Consents signed by a sufficient number of shareholders to take action by written consents must be delivered to Applied no later than 120 days after the applicable record date.uncontested elections.

 

 

To ensure that the written consent is in complianceMajority Voting for Charter and Bylaw Amendments. Applied’s charter and bylaw provisions do not have supermajority voting provisions—shareholders can approve binding charter and bylaw amendments with applicable laws and isa majority vote.

No Shareholder Rights Plan. Applied does not duplicative, the Proposed Amendment provides that the written consent process would not be available in a limited number of circumstances, including (i) for matters that are not a proper subject for shareholder action, (ii) if the request to set a record date is received by Applied during the period commencing 90 days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the most recent annual meeting and ending on the date of the final adjournment of the next annual meeting, (iii) if an identical or substantially similar item was presented athave a shareholder meeting held within 90 days before Applied received the request for a record date, (iv) if an identicalrights plan or substantially similar item is included in our notice for a shareholder meeting that was called, but not yet held, or that is called to be held within 90 days after Applied received the request for a record date and (v) if the record date request was made in a manner that involved a violation of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act or other applicable law. The nomination, elections and removal of directors are deemed substantially similar items

poison pill.

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    51


 

to all actions involvingIndependent Board Leadership. Applied has separated the nomination, election or removalroles of directors, changing the sizeChair of the Board and fillingChief Executive Officer. The Chair of vacancies or newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the numberBoard is an independent director—as are all of authorized directorships.

the chairs of the committees of the Board.

This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference

Shareholder Engagement. We regularly engage with our investors to solicit their views on important issues, and in recent years shareholder feedback has influenced changes to our executive compensation program and corporate governance practices. We are committed to having a continuing robust dialogue with our shareholders regarding our corporate governance practices and policies.

In light of Applied’s strong corporate governance practices, including the existing rights of shareholders to the complete text of the proposed amended and restated Certificate of Incorporation, which is attached asAppendix B to this Proxy Statement.

Shareholder Approval Required

Adoption of this proposal requires the affirmative vote ofcall a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

If approved by shareholders, Applied will promptly file with the Delaware Secretary of State an amended and restated

Certificate of Incorporation, the form of which is attached asAppendix B to this Proxy Statement, incorporating the Proposed Amendment. The amended and restated Certificate of Incorporation will become effective on the date the filing is accepted by the Delaware Secretary of State. If the Proposed Amendment is not approved by the requisite vote, the Proposed Amendment will not be implemented and the current prohibition on shareholder actionspecial meeting, act by written consent will remain.

If the Proposed Amendment is approved by shareholders,and nominate directors through proxy access, the Board has approved conforming changes to Applied’s bylaws, which would become effective upon the filingbelieves that adoption of the amendedshareholder proposal is unnecessary and restated Certificateis not in the best interests of Incorporation with the Delaware Secretary of State.

Applied and its shareholders.

 

 

 ✓ Ò 

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTEFORAGAINST THIS PROPOSAL REQUESTING THAT THE APPROVALOWNERSHIP THRESHOLD REQUIRED TO CALL SPECIAL MEETINGS BE LOWERED TO 10% OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENTTHE OUTSTANDING SHARES OF OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO ALLOW SHAREHOLDERS TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENTCOMMON STOCK

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    57


52    2020 Proxy StatementPROPOSAL 5—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND POLICY

Jing Zhao, whose address and stockholding will be provided by us upon request, has submitted the following proposal. The shareholder proposal will be voted on at the 2022 Annual Meeting only if properly presented by or on behalf of the proponent.

Applied is not responsible for the accuracy or content of the proposal and supporting statement, which are presented below as received from the proponent.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS A VOTE AGAINST THIS SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL.

Shareholder Proposal

Shareholder Proposal to Improve Executive Compensation Program and Policy

Resolved: shareholders recommend that Applied Materials, Inc. (the Company) improve the executive compensation program and policy, such as to include the CEO pay ratio factor and voices from employees.

Supporting Statement

The Company’s board opposed to improve the executive compensation program and policy at our 2021 shareholders meeting (2021 Proxy Statement pp. 67-68) and increased more than half of the CEO pay ratio from 135 to 1 (2020 Proxy Statement p. 46) to 204 to 1 (2021 Proxy Statement p. 49).

America’s ballooning executive compensation is not sustainable for the economy, and there is no rational methodology or program to decide the executive compensation, particularly there is no consideration of the CEO pay ratio factor and voices from employees (2021 Proxy Statement “Compensation discussion and analysis” pp. 21-43). The CEO pay ratios of big Japanese and European companies are much less than of big American companies.

There is a new trend pushing for employee representation on boards, a practice quite commonplace in Europe. “Appointing workers’ representatives to company boards may be an idea whose time has come,” says Harvard Business Review, and a study found that employee representation on boards generated a 25% spike in productivity and increased wages.1 Under the latest revised UK Corporate Governance Code and amended corporate reporting law and regulations, boards must engage with employees and the wider workforce to enhance the employee voices in the boardroom.2

Before there is employee representation on board, the Company has the flexibility to reform the Human Resource and Compensation Committee to improve the executive compensation program and policy, such as to include the CEO pay ratio factor and voices from employees.

1  https://www.govenda.com/blog/employee-representation-on-boards/

2 https://www.pinsentmasons.com/out-law/analysis/ corporate-governance-employee-voice-workplace-reporting

Board of Directors Statement in Opposition

The Board of Directors recommends that you vote AGAINST Proposal 5 for the following reasons:

The Company has a deep commitment to operating its business in a sustainable and responsible manner, and the Board has taken steps to ensure that the executive compensation program reflects this commitment. Following careful review and consideration, the Board has determined that support for this shareholder proposal is unwarranted because the Board’s Human Resources and Compensation Committee (the “HRCC”) already considers feedback on employee experience and reviews the CEO pay ratios of the Company and its peers. Moreover, the HRCC regularly reviews and updates the executive compensation program to align the program with the Company’s business objectives, shareholder feedback and market trends.

The principal objectives of the Company’s executive compensation program are:

to attract, reward, and retain highly-talented executive officers and other key employees;

to motivate these individuals to achieve short-term and long-term goals that enhance shareholder value; and

to support our core values and culture.

As a reference point for evaluating our compensation program, the HRCC regularly reviews compensation practices within our peer group. See “Compensation and Analysis—Compensation Governance and Decision-Making Framework—Fiscal 2021 Peer Group Companies.” On an annual basis, the HRCC also reviews the Company’s CEO

58    2022 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONSPROPOSAL 5—SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL REGARDING EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2020 ANNUAL MEETINGPOLICY

pay ratio, changes in the ratio from year to year, as well as the ratios of certain other peer companies and companies in the S&P 500 Index. Although SEC rules require disclosure of the ratio of annual CEO compensation to the annual compensation of a median employee, the HRCC does not believe that the pay ratio should more directly guide our compensation principles or that our executive compensation program should be changed as described in this proposal.

Our Board and management team actively seek the feedback of our shareholders, including with respect to our executive compensation program and matters related to our employees, and consider that feedback in their decision-making. Feedback obtained through our robust shareholder outreach program over the last few years has resulted in the implementation of changes to our executive compensation program, including a comprehensive redesign of our long-term incentive program in 2017 that, among other things, established new performance metrics and extended performance measurement periods from one year to three years.

As described in more detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” a significant portion of the Company’s executive compensation is performance-based and dependent upon the success of the Company in creating long-term value for its shareholders. Annual bonuses are determined by the HRCC based on achievement of a set of objective corporate scorecard measures across four categories—Financial and Market Performance and Execution, Products and Growth, Customers, and People and Organization—as well as individual executive performance. The corporate scorecard objectives include those specifically tied to issues relevant to the Company’s workforce, such as employee safety, learning and career development, and diversity and inclusion. As a result, employee considerations are reflected in the executive compensation program.

Our Board and management team are committed to continually receiving input from employees and responding to

such input. The Company has historically managed and measured organizational health with a view to gaining insight into employees’ experiences, levels of workplace satisfaction, and feelings of engagement and inclusion. The Company has used McKinsey & Company’s Organizational Health Index (OHI) and employee engagement pulse surveys to measure its organizational health and employee experiences. Insights from the Company’s surveys are used to develop both company-wide and business unit level organizational and talent development plans. In addition, on a quarterly basis, the Company holds an all employee meeting where our Chief Executive Officer, who is also a Board member, and other members of management provide an update on the Company’s business performance for the quarter and hold a Q&A session where they answer questions from employees.

Our Board also periodically meets with employees worldwide. For example, prior to the restrictions on travel brought about by the Covid-19 pandemic, in 2019, the Board held Board and Committee meetings at our offices in Taiwan, where directors attended the grand opening of our new Display Equipment Manufacturing Center and R&D Laboratory, participated in a local employee all-hands meeting and met with our regional executives. These interactions, along with meetings with other senior leadership throughout the year, give directors additional visibility to provide oversight of the Company’s culture, strategies, and operations.

The Company believes that input from employees is valuable in decision making and in shaping organizational culture. However, the Board believes the independent HRCC is best positioned to have a holistic view of the Company’s strategic needs and objectives, and therefore to design incentives to promote them.

For these reasons, the Board has determined that support for this shareholder proposal is unwarranted and believes that our current compensation program and policy are appropriate, reflect stakeholder input and incorporate considerations around our valued people.

 ÒTHE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE AGAINST THIS PROPOSAL REQUESTING OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS TO AMEND OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND POLICY

Applied Materials, Inc.    59


 

QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY

STATEMENT AND OUR 20202022 ANNUAL MEETING

 

Q:

Why am I receiving these materials?

 

A:

The Board of Directors of Applied Materials is providing these materials to you in connection with itsApplied’s solicitation of proxies for use at Applied’s 20202022 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The 20202022 Annual Meeting will be held on Thursday, March 12, 2020,10, 2022, online at our corporate offices at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054.www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022 via a live webcast. Shareholders are invited to attend the Annual Meeting via the live webcast and to vote on the proposals described in this Proxy Statement.

These proxy materials are being provided on or about January 30, 2020 to all shareholders of record of Applied as of January 16, 2020.

These proxy materials are being provided on or about January 26, 2022 to all shareholders of record of Applied as of January 12, 2022.

Q:

What information is contained in these materials?

 

A:

This Proxy Statement contains important information regarding the 20202022 Annual Meeting, the proposals on which you are being asked to vote, the voting process and procedures, and information you may find useful in determining how to vote.

If you requested to receive printed proxy materials, these materials also include an accompanying proxy card. If you received more than one proxy card, this generally means your shares are registered differently or are in more than one account. Please provide voting instructions for each proxy card or, if you vote via the Internet or by telephone, vote once for each proxy card you receive to ensure that all of your shares are voted.

 

 

Q:

What proposals will be voted on at the Annual Meeting? What are the Board’s recommendations?

 

A:

The following table describes the proposals to be voted on at the Annual Meeting and the Board’s voting recommendations:

 

Proposal     Board Recommendation

 1. Election of ten directors

 

 

FOR each Nominee

 2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2019

2021

 

 

FOR

 3. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020

2022

 FOR

 

4. Shareholder proposal regarding special shareholder meeting

 

FOR×

AGAINST

 

 4. Approval of an amendment5. Shareholder proposal regarding executive compensation program and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to allow shareholders to act by written consent

policy

 

×
 

FORAGAINST

At the time this Proxy Statement was mailed, we were not aware of any other matters to be presented at the Annual Meeting other than those set forth in this Proxy Statement and in the notice accompanying this Proxy Statement.

 

Q:

What is the record date? How many shares are entitled to vote?

 

A:

Shareholders who owned Applied common stock at the close of business on January 16, 2020,12, 2022, the record date, are entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. On the record date, there were 918,606,597887,992,427 shares of Applied common stock outstanding. Each share of Applied common stock is entitled to one vote for each director nominee and one vote for each of the proposals to be voted on.

 

 

A complete list of these shareholders will be available at our corporate offices at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054 during regular business hours for the 10 days prior to the Annual Meeting. To make arrangements to view the list, please contact our Corporate Secretary by e-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com. This list also will be available during the Annual Meeting online at the meeting location.

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022. A shareholder may examine the list for any legally valid purpose related to the Annual Meeting.

Q:

What is the difference between holding shares as a shareholder of record and as a beneficial owner?

 

A:

Most Applied shareholders hold their shares as beneficial owners (through a broker, bank, or other nominee) rather than as a shareholder of record (directly in their own name).

 

Shareholders of Record. If your shares are registered directly in your name with Applied’s transfer agent, Computershare, you are considered the shareholder of

60    2022 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2022 ANNUAL MEETING

record with respect to those shares, and these proxy materials are being sent directly to you. As a shareholder of record, you have the right to grant your voting proxy directly to Applied or to vote in personelectronically at the Annual Meeting. If you requested printed proxy materials, we have enclosed an accompanying proxy card for you to

Applied Materials, Inc.    53


use. You may also submit voting instructions via the Internet or by telephone by following the instructions on the accompanying proxy card, as described below under “How can I vote my shares?”

Beneficial Owners.If your shares are held in a brokerage account or by a broker, bank, or other nominee, you are considered the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and these proxy materials are being forwarded to you by your broker, bank, or other nominee, which is considered the shareholder of record with respect to those shares. As a beneficial owner, you have the right to direct your broker, bank, or other nominee on how to vote the shares in your account. However, because you are not the shareholder of record, you may not vote these shares in personelectronically at the Annual Meeting, unless you request and provide atfollow the Annual Meeting a valid proxyinstructions from your broker, bank, or other nominee. Your broker, bank, or other nominee has included a voting instruction form for you to use to direct them how to vote your shares. Please instruct your broker, bank, or other nominee how to vote your shares using the voting instruction form you received from them.

 

Q:

CanHow can I attend the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

Applied shareholders on the record date or their legal proxy holders may attend the Annual Meeting.Meeting online at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022. To be admitted toparticipate in the Annual Meeting, you will need the 16-digit control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials, on your proxy card or on the instructions that accompanied your proxy materials. Beneficial shareholders who did not receive a form of photo identification16-digit control number from their bank or brokerage firm and valid proof of ownership of Applied common stockwho wish to attend the meeting should follow the instructions from their bank or brokerage firm, including any requirement to obtain a valid legal proxy. If you haveMost brokerage firms or banks allow a shareholder to obtain a legal proxy from a shareholder of record, you must bring a form of photo identification and the legal proxy to the Annual Meeting. If you have a legal proxy from a street name shareholder, you must bring a form of photo identification, a legal proxy from the record holder (i.e., the bank, brokereither online or other holder of record) to the street name shareholder that is assignable, and the legal proxy from the street name shareholder to you. Each shareholder may appoint only one proxy holder to attend on such shareholder’s behalf.by mail.

The use of cameras, recording equipment and other electronic devices (including cell phones, tablets, laptops, etc.) is not permitted at the Annual Meeting.

 

Q:

How can I vote my shares?

 

A:

You may vote over the Internet, by telephone, by mail, or in personelectronically at the Annual Meeting. Votes submitted by telephone or over the Internet must be received by 11:59 p.m., Eastern Time, on Wednesday, March 11, 2020,9, 2022, unless otherwise indicated.

Voting over the Internet. To vote over the Internet, please follow either the instructions included on your proxy card or the voting instructions you receive bye-mail or that are

are being provided via the Internet. If you vote over the Internet, you do not need to complete and mail a proxy card.

being provided via the Internet. If you vote over the Internet, you do not need to complete and mail a proxy card.

Voting by Telephone. If you have requested printed proxy materials, such materials will include instructions for how to vote by telephone. Please follow either the instructions included on your proxy card or voting instruction form. If you vote by telephone, you do not need to complete and mail a proxy card.

Voting by Mail. If you have requested printed proxy materials, you may vote by mail by signing the proxy card and returning it in the prepaid and addressed envelope enclosed with the proxy materials. By signing and returning the proxy card, you are authorizing the individuals named on the proxy card to vote your shares at the Annual Meeting in the manner you indicate. We encourage you to sign and return the proxy card even if you plan to attend the Annual Meeting so that your shares will be voted if you are unable to attend the Annual Meeting. If you receive more than one proxy card, it is an indication that your shares are held in multiple accounts. Please sign and return all proxy cards to ensure that all of your shares are voted. Your printed proxy materials may also indicate methods whereby you may vote by telephone or over the Internet instead of signing, dating a returning the proxy card by mail.

Voting in PersonElectronically at the Meeting. If you attend the virtual Annual Meeting and plan to vote in person, we will provide you with a ballotelectronically at the Annual Meeting.Meeting, you can vote by following the instructions provided when you log in to the online virtual Annual Meeting platform. If you are a shareholder of record, you have the right to vote in personelectronically at the Annual Meeting. If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in street name, and you wish tomay also vote in personelectronically at the Annual Meeting if you will need to bring tofollow the Annual Meeting a legal proxyinstructions from your broker, bank, or other nominee authorizing you to vote those shares.

Applied Employee Plan Participants. If you own shares purchased through Applied’s Employees’ Stock Purchase Plan or Applied’s Stock Purchase Plan for Offshore Employees that are still held by the plans’ recordkeeper and you do not vote these shares, the shares may be voted in accordance with standard brokerage industry practices only on routine matters.

 

Q:

Can I change my vote or revoke my proxy?

 

A:

If you are a shareholder of record, you may change your vote or revoke your proxy at any time before the Annual Meeting. To change your vote or revoke your proxy, you must:

 

  Sign and return a later-dated proxy card, or enter a new vote over the Internet or by telephone; or

 

54    2020 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2020 ANNUAL MEETING

  

Provide written notice of the revocation to Applied’s Corporate Secretary at: Applied Materials, Inc., Attention: Christina Y. Lai,Teri A. Little, Corporate Secretary, 3225

Applied Materials, Inc.    61


Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1268, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95052, or bye-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com, before the proxies vote your shares at the Annual Meeting; or

 

  Attend the virtual Annual Meeting and vote in person.electronically at the meeting.

Only the latest validly-executed proxy that you submit will be counted.

 

Q:

What is the quorum requirement for the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

A majority of the outstanding shares entitled to vote as of the record date must be present at the Annual Meeting to constitute a quorum and in order to conduct business at the Annual Meeting. Your shares are counted as present if you vote in personelectronically at the Annual Meeting, over the Internet, by telephone, or by submitting a properly executed proxy card by mail.

Abstentions and brokernon-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining a quorum.

 

Q:

How are votes counted?

 

A:

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to each of the director nominees. If you elect to abstain from voting on the election of directors, the abstention will not have any effect on the election of directors. In tabulating the voting results for the election of directors, only “FOR” and “AGAINST” votes are counted.

You may vote “FOR,” “AGAINST,” or “ABSTAIN” with respect to:

 

  Proposal 2: The approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2019;2021;
  Proposal 3: The ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020;2022;

Proposal 4: The shareholder proposal regarding special shareholder meeting right; and

 

  Proposal 5: The approval of an amendmentshareholder proposal regarding executive compensation program and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to allow shareholders to act by written consent.policy.

If you elect to abstain from voting on any of these threefour proposals, the abstention will have the same effect as an “AGAINST” vote with respect to such proposals.

If you are a shareholder of record and you sign and return your proxy card without giving specific voting instructions, your shares will be voted on the proposals as recommended by our Board and in accordance with the discretion of the persons named on the proxy card with respect to any other matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting.

If your shares are held in street name and you do not instruct your broker on a timely basis on how to vote your shares, your brokerage firm, in its discretion, may either leave your shares unvoted or vote your shares on routine matters. Only the ratification of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm is a routine matter. Without your voting instructions, your brokerage firm cannot vote your shares on any other proposal. These unvoted shares, called “brokernon-votes,” refer to shares held by brokers who have not received voting instructions from their clients and who do not have discretionary authority to vote onnon-routine matters. Brokernon-votes are not considered entitled to vote onnon-routine proposals. Brokernon-votes will not have an effect on the election of any director nomineeProposals 1, 2, 4 or the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers. Brokernon-votes will have the same effect as a vote against the proposal to amend and restate our Certificate of Incorporation.5.

 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    55

62    2022 Proxy Statement


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2022 ANNUAL MEETING

Q: What is the vote requirement to approve each proposal?

 

A:

The following table describes the proposals to be considered at the Annual Meeting, the vote required to elect directors and to adopt each of the other proposals, and the manner in which votes will be counted:

 

Proposal 

Vote

Required

 

Effect of

Abstentions

 

Effect of

BrokerNon-Votes

 1. Election of ten directors

 

Majority of votes cast

 

No effect

 

No effect

 2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 2019

2021

 

Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon

 

Same as vote against

 

No effect

 3. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020

2022

 

Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon

 

Same as vote against

 

Brokers have discretion to vote

 

4. Approval of an amendment and restatement of our Certificate of Incorporation to allow shareholders to act by written consent

Shareholder proposal regarding special shareholder meeting

 

Majority of all outstanding shares

present and entitled to vote thereon
 

Same as vote against

No effect

 5. Shareholder proposal regarding executive compensation program and policy

 

Majority of shares present and entitled to vote thereon

Same as vote against

No effect

 

Q:

Who will count the votes? Where can I find the voting results of the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

Votes will be tabulated by an independent inspector of elections appointed for the Annual Meeting. Preliminary voting results will be announced at the Annual Meeting. Final voting results will be reported in a Current Report on Form8-K, which will be filed with the SEC following the Annual Meeting.

 

Q:

Who will bear the cost of soliciting votes for the Annual Meeting?

 

A:

Applied will bear the entire cost of proxy solicitation, including the preparation, assembly, printing, mailing and distribution of the proxy materials. We have hired Innisfree M&A Incorporated to assist in the distribution and solicitation of proxies. Solicitations may be made personally or by mail, facsimile, telephone, messenger, or via the Internet. In addition to the estimated proxy solicitation cost of $20,000, plus reasonableout-of-pocket expenses for this service, we will reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians for their reasonableout-of-pocket expenses for forwarding the proxy materials to shareholders.

Q:

Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full set of proxy materials?

 

A:

In accordance with SEC rules, we are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily via the Internet, instead of mailing printed copies of those materials to each shareholder. On January 30, 2020,26, 2022, we commenced mailing a Notice of Internet Availability to our shareholders (other than those who had previously requested electronic or paper delivery) containing instructions on how to access our proxy materials, including this Proxy Statement and our Annual Report. The Notice of Internet Availability also instructs you on how to vote over the Internet.

This process is designed to expedite shareholders’ receipt of proxy materials, lower the cost of the Annual Meeting, and help conserve natural resources. However, if you would prefer to receive printed proxy materials, please follow the instructions included in the Notice of Internet Availability. If you have previously elected to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive these materials viae-mail unless you elect otherwise.

 

 

56    2020 Proxy Statement

Applied Materials, Inc.    63


QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS ABOUT THE PROXY STATEMENT AND OUR 2020 ANNUAL MEETING

 

Q:

I share an address with another shareholder and we received only one paper copy of the proxy materials. How can I obtain an additional copy of the proxy materials?

 

A:

Under a practice approved by the SEC called “householding,” shareholders who have the same address and last name and who do not participate in electronic delivery of proxy materials will receive only one mailed copy of our proxy materials, unless one or more of these shareholders notifies us that he or shethey wish to receive individual

 wishes to receive individual copies. Shareholders who participate in householding will continue to receive separate proxy cards.

If you share an address with another shareholder and received only one set of proxy materials and would like to request a separate paper copy of these materials, please: (1) go to www.proxyvote.com and follow the instructions provided; (2) send ane-mail message to investor_relations@amat.com with “Request for Proxy Materials” in the subject line and provide your name, address and the control number indicated on your proxy card or Notice of Internet Availability; or (3) call our Investor Relations department at(408) 748-5227.

 

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    57

64    2022 Proxy Statement


OTHER MATTERS

OTHER MATTERS

Shareholder Proposals or Nominations for 20212023 Annual Meeting

 

 

If a shareholder would like us to consider including a proposal in the proxy statement for our 20212023 Annual Meeting pursuant toRule 14a-8 of the Exchange Act, the proposal must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices or by e-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com on or before October 2, 2020.September 28, 2022.

For a shareholder’s notice of nomination of one or more director candidates to be included in our proxy statement and ballot pursuant to the proxy access right included in Section 2.15 of our Bylaws, it must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices or by e-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com no earlier than September 2, 2020,August 29, 2022, and no later than the close of business on October 2, 2020.September 28, 2022. The notice must contain the information required by our Bylaws, and the shareholder(s) and nominee(s) must comply with the information and other

requirements in our Bylaws relating to the inclusion of shareholder nominees in our proxy materials.

If a shareholder seeks to propose other business or nominate a director, but does not seek to include a proposal or director nominee in our proxy statement for our 20212023 Annual Meeting, notice must be received by our Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than November 27, 2020,25, 2022, and no later than the close of business on December 27, 2020.25, 2022.

Our Bylaws contain specific requirements regarding a shareholder’s ability to nominate a director or to submit a proposal for consideration at an upcoming meeting. If you would like a copy of our Bylaws, please contact our Corporate Secretary by mail addressed to Christina Y. Lai, Corporate Secretary, Applied Materials, Inc., 3225 Oakmead Village Drive, M/S 1268, P.O. Box 58039, Santa Clara, CA 95052, or bye-mail at corporatesecretary@amat.com.

 

 

No Incorporation by Reference

 

 

In Applied’s filings with the SEC, information is sometimes “incorporated by reference.” This means that we are referring you to information that has previously been filed with the SEC and the information should be considered as part of the particular filing. As provided under SEC rules, the “Audit Committee Report” and the “Human Resources and Compensation Committee Report” contained in this Proxy Statement are not incorporated by reference into any of our other filings with the SEC, except to the extent we specifically incorporate either report by reference into a filing. In addition, this Proxy Statement includes several website addresses.addresses, including the website where our Sustainability Report can be accessed. These website addresses are intended to provide inactive, textual references only. The information on these websites and in our Sustainability Report is not part of or incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.Statement or any of our other filings with the SEC.

YOU MAY OBTAIN A COPY OF APPLIED’S ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 27, 201931, 2021 ON OUR WEBSITE ATwww.appliedmaterials.com OR WITHOUT CHARGE BY SENDING A WRITTEN REQUEST TO APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., 3050 BOWERS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 58039, M/S 1261, SANTA CLARA, CALIFORNIA 95052-8039, ATTN: INVESTOR RELATIONS.

By Order of the Board of Directors

Santa Clara, California

January 30, 202026, 2022

 

 

58    2020 Proxy Statement

Applied Materials, Inc.    65


APPENDIX A

 

UNAUDITED RECONCILIATION OFNON-GAAP ADJUSTED FINANCIAL MEASURES

 

   

Fiscal Year

 
    2019  2018  2017  2016   2015 
   (In millions, except per share amounts) 

Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Diluted Share

       

Reported earnings per diluted share—GAAP basis1,2

  $2.86 $2.96 $3.25 $1.54  $1.12

Certain items associated with acquisitions3

   0.05  0.18  0.16  0.16   0.14

Acquisition integration and deal costs

   0.02  —     —     —      —   

Impairment (gain on sale) of strategic investments, net

   —     (0.02  —     —      —   

Loss (gain) on strategic investments, net

   (0.03  —     —     —      —   

Certain items associated with terminated business combination4

   —     —     —     —      0.03

Gain on derivatives associated with terminated business combination, net

   —     —     —     —      (0.05

Inventory charges (reversals) related to restructuring and asset impairments5

   —     —     —     —      0.03

Other gains, losses or charges, net

   —     —     (0.01  0.01   0.01

Income tax effect of changes in applicable U.S. tax laws6

   (0.03  1.08  —     —      —   

Income tax effects related to amortization of intra-entity intangible asset transfers

   0.07  —     —     —      —   
Resolution of prior years’ income tax filings, reinstatement of federal R&D tax credit and other tax items2   0.10  (0.02  (0.07  0.04   (0.09
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted earnings per diluted share

  $3.04 $4.18 $3.33 $1.75  $1.19
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average number of diluted shares

   945  1,026  1,084  1,116   1,226
   

Fiscal Year

 

 
    2021  2020  2019  2018  2017 
   (In millions, except per share amounts) 

Non-GAAP Adjusted Earnings Per Diluted Share

      

Reported earnings per diluted share—GAAP basis1

  $6.40 $3.92 $2.86 $2.96 $3.25

Certain items associated with acquisitions2

   0.04  0.05  0.05  0.18  0.16

Acquisition integration and deal costs

   0.04  0.07  0.02  —     —   

Certain incremental expenses related to COVID-193

   0.02  0.03  —     —     —   

Severance and related charges4

   0.13  —     —     —     —   

Deal termination fee

   0.17  —     —     —     —   

Realized loss (gain) on strategic investments, net

   (0.03  —     —     (0.02  —   

Unrealized loss (gain) on strategic investments, net

   (0.05  (0.01  (0.03  —     —   

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

   —     0.03  —     —     —   

Other charges

   0.01  —     —     —     (0.01

Income tax effect of changes in applicable U.S. tax laws5

   —     —     (0.03  1.08  —   

Income tax effects related to intra-entity intangible asset transfers

   0.07  0.12  0.07  —     —   

Resolution of prior years’ income tax filings and other tax items

   0.04  (0.04  0.10  (0.02  (0.07
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted earnings per diluted share

  $6.84 $4.17 $3.04 $4.18 $3.33
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Weighted average number of diluted shares

   919  923  945  1,026  1,084

 

1 

AmountsAmount for fiscal 2017 included the recognition of the previously unrecognized foreign tax credits.

2 

Amounts for fiscal 2015 included an adjustment to decrease the provision for income taxes by $28 million with a corresponding increase in net income, resulting in an increase in diluted earnings per share of $0.02. The adjustment was excluded in Applied’s non-GAAP adjusted results and was made primarily to correct an error in the recognition of cost of sales in the U.S. related to intercompany sales, which resulted in overstating profitability in the U.S. and the provision for income taxes in immaterial amounts in each year since fiscal 2010.

3

These items are incremental charges attributable to acquisitions, consisting of amortization of purchased intangible assets.

3

Temporary incremental employee compensation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

4 

These items are incrementalThe severance and related charges primarily related to the terminated business combination agreement with Tokyo Electron Limited, consisting of acquisition-related and integration planning costs.a one-time voluntary retirement program offered to certain eligible employees.

5

Results for fiscal 2015 primarily included $35 million of inventory charges, $17 million of restructuring charges and asset impairments related to cost reductions in the solar business, and a $2 million favorable adjustment of restructuring reserves related to prior restructuring plans.

6 

Charges to income tax provision related to aone-time transition tax and a decrease in U.S. deferred tax assets as a result of the recent U.S. tax legislation.

 

   Fiscal Year
    20192021
   (In millions, except
percentages)

Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit

    

Reported gross profit—GAAP basis

  $6,386  $10,914

Certain items associated with acquisitions1

   37   27
  

 

 

Certain incremental expenses related to COVID-192

   12

Other charges

   2
  

 

 

Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Profit

  $6,423  $10,955
  

 

   

 

 

Non-GAAP Adjusted Gross Margin (% of net sales)

   44.0   47.5

 

1 

These items are incremental charges attributable to acquisitions, consisting of amortization of purchased intangible assets.

2

Temporary incremental employee compensation during the COVID-19 pandemic.

 

Applied Materials, Inc.    A-1

Applied Materials, Inc.    A-1


   

Fiscal Year

 
    2019  2018  2017  2016  2015 
   (In millions, except percentages) 

Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported operating income—GAAP basis

  $3,350 $4,491 $3,936 $2,152 $1,693

Certain items associated with acquisitions1

   55  197  191  188  185

Acquisition integration and deal costs

   22  5  3  2  2

Certain items associated with terminated business combination2

   —     —     —     —     50

Gain on derivatives associated with terminated business combination, net

   —     —     —     —     (89

Inventory charges (reversals) related to restructuring and asset impairments3,4

   —     —     —     (3  49

Other gains, losses or charges, net

   —     —     (12  8  6
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted operating income

  $3,427 $4,693 $4,118 $2,347 $1,896
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin

   23.5  28.1  28.0  21.7  19.6

   

Fiscal Year

 

 
    2021  2020  2019  2018  2017 
   (In millions, except percentages) 

Non-GAAP Adjusted Operating Income

  

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Reported operating income—GAAP basis

  $6,889 $4,365 $3,350 $4,491 $3,936

Certain items associated with acquisitions1

   47  54  55  197  191

Acquisition integration and deal costs

   45  80  22  5  3

Certain incremental expenses related to COVID-192

   24  30  —     —     —   

Severance and related charges3

   157  —     —     —     —   

Deal termination fee

   154  —     —     —     —   

Other charges

   6  —     —     —     (12
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted operating income

  $7,322 $4,529 $3,427 $4,693 $4,118
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Non-GAAP adjusted operating margin

   31.7  26.3  23.5  28.1  28.0

1 

These items are incremental charges attributable to completed acquisitions, consisting of amortization of purchased intangible assets.

2 

These items areTemporary incremental charges related toemployee compensation during the terminated business combination agreement with Tokyo Electron Limited, consisting of acquisition-related and integration planning costs.COVID-19 pandemic.

3 

Results for fiscal 2016 included adjustments associated with the cost reductions in the solar business.

4

Results for fiscal 2015 primarily included $35 million of inventoryThe severance and related charges $17 million of restructuring charges and asset impairmentsprimarily related to cost reductions in the solar business, and a $2 million favorable adjustment of restructuring reserves relatedone-time voluntary retirement program offered to prior restructuring plans.certain eligible employees.

Use ofNon-GAAP Adjusted Financial Measures

Management usesnon-GAAP adjusted financial measures to evaluate the Company’s operating and financial performance and for planning purposes, and as performance measures in its executive compensation program. Applied believes these measures enhance an overall understanding of its performance and investors’ ability to review the Company’s business from the same perspective as the Company’s management and facilitate comparisons of this period’s results with prior periods on a consistent basis by excluding items that management does not believe are indicative of Applied’s ongoing operating performance.

Thenon-GAAP adjusted financial measures presented above are adjusted to exclude the impact of certain costs, expenses, gains and losses, including certain items related to mergers and acquisitions; restructuring and severance charges and any associated adjustments; certain incremental expenses related to COVID-19;impairments of assets, or investments;assets; gain or loss on salestrategic investments; loss on early extinguishment of strategic investments;debt; certain income tax items and other discrete adjustments. Additionally, fiscal 2019 and 2018non-GAAP results exclude estimated discrete income tax expense items associated with recent U.S. tax legislation. Reconciliations of thesenon-GAAP measures to the most directly comparable financial measures calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP are provided in the financial tables presented above. There are limitations in usingnon-GAAP financial measures because thenon-GAAP financial measures are not prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, may be different fromnon-GAAP financial measures used by other companies, and may exclude certain items that may have a material impact upon our reported financial results. The presentation of this additional information is not meant to be considered in isolation or as a substitute for the directly comparable financial measures prepared in accordance with GAAP.

Applied adopted the authoritative guidance related to revenue recognition in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 using the full retrospective method. Applied also adopted authoritative guidance related to retirement benefits in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 using the retrospective method. The adoption of these guidance required restating fiscal years 2018 and 2017 results as presented above.

A-2    2020 Proxy Statement


APPENDIX B

PROPOSED AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE

OF INCORPORATION

AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

OF

APPLIED MATERIALS, INC.

(as amended to March 10, 2009)

Applied Materials, Inc., a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Delaware, hereby certifies as follows:

(1)

The original certificate of incorporation was filed with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware on March 18, 1987.

(2)

This Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation was duly adopted by the board of directors of the corporation and by the stockholders of the Corporation in accordance with Sections 242 and 245 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”).

(3)

Pursuant to Sections 242 and 245 of the DGCL, the text of the Certificate of Incorporation of Applied Materials, Inc. is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as follows:

FIRST: The name of the corporation is Applied Materials, Inc.

SECOND: The address of the corporation’s registered office in the State of Delaware is CorporationTrust Center, 1209 Orange StreetService Company, 251 Little Falls Drive, in the City of Wilmington,Delaware, County of New Castle, 19808-1674. The name of its registered agent at that address isThe CorporationTrustService Company.

THIRD: Reserved

THIRD: The name and mailing address of the incorporator of the corporation is: Donald A.

Slichter

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe 55

Almaden Boulevard

San Jose, California 95113

FOURTH: The nature of the business or purposes to be conducted or promoted by the corporation is to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the General Corporation Law of Delaware.

FIFTH: 1. The corporation is authorized to issue two classes of shares to be designated, respectively, “Preferred Stock” and “Common Stock.” The number of shares of Preferred Stock authorized to be issued is One Million (1,000,000) and the number of shares of Common Stock authorized to be issued is Two Billion Five Hundred Million (2,500,000,000). The stock, whether Preferred Stock or Common Stock, shall have a par value of $.01 per share.

2. The shares of Preferred Stock may be issued from time to time in one or more series. The Board of Directors is authorized, by filing a certificate pursuant to the applicable law of the State of Delaware, to establish from time to time the number of shares to be included in each such series, and to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof, including but not limited to the fixing or alteration of the dividend rights, dividend rate, conversion rights, voting rights, rights and terms of redemption (including sinking fund provisions), the redemption price or prices, and the liquidation preferences of any wholly unissued series of shares of Preferred Stock; and to increase or decrease the number of shares of any series subsequent to the issue of shares of that series, but not below the number of shares of such series then outstanding. In case the number of shares of any series shall be so decreased, the shares constituting such decrease shall resume the status which they had prior to the adoption of the resolution originally fixing the number of shares of such series.

SIXTH: In furtherance and not in limitation of the powers conferred by statute, the Board of Directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend and repeal from time to time any or all of the bylaws of the corporation, including bylaw amendments increasing or reducing the authorized number of directors.

SEVENTH: No action shall be taken by the stockholders except at an annual or special meeting of stockholders. No action shall be taken by stockholders by written consent.

SEVENTH: 1. Action by Written Consent. Subject to the rights of the holders of any series of Preferred Stock or any other series or class of stock as set forth in this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to elect directors under specificcircumstances, all actions required or permitted to be taken by the stockholders of the corporation entitled to vote at an annual

Applied Materials, Inc.    B-1


or special meeting of stockholders of the corporation may be effected without a meeting by the written consent of suchstockholders pursuant to Section 228 of the General corporation Law of the State of Delaware; provided that no such action maybe effected except in accordance with the provisions of this Article SEVENTH, the bylaws of the corporation and applicable law.

2. Request for Record Date. The record date for determining such stockholders entitled to consent to corporate action in writing without a meeting shall be as fixed by the Board of Directors or as otherwise established under this Article SEVENTH. Any stockholder of the corporation seeking to have the stockholders authorize or take corporate action by written consent without a meeting shall, by written request addressed to the secretary of this corporation and delivered by certified mail to the corporation’s principal executive offices and signed by one or more stockholders of record (“Record Stockholders”) of at least twenty percent (20%) of the outstanding shares of Common Stock of the corporation (the “Requisite Percentage”) (which shares are determined to be “Owned” by such Record Stockholders in accordance with Section 2.3 of the bylaws of the corporation, as may be amended from time to time) at the time such request is delivered that shall not revoke such request and that shall continue to be Record Stockholders of not less than the Requisite Percentage through the date of delivery of consents at the time such request is delivered to request that a record date be fixed for such purpose. The written request must contain the information set forth in paragraph3 of this Article SEVENTH. Following delivery of the request, the Board of Directors shall, by the later of (i) twenty (20) days after delivery of a valid request to set a record date and (ii) five (5) days after delivery of any information required by the corporation to determine the validity of the request for a record date or to determine whether the action to which the request relates may be effected by written consent under paragraph 4 of this Article SEVENTH, determine the validity of the request and whether the request relates to an action that may be taken by written consent and, if appropriate, adopt a resolution fixing the record date for such purpose. The record date for such purpose shall be no more than ten (10) days after the date upon which the resolution fixing the record date is adopted by the Board of Directors and shall not precede the date such resolution is adopted. If a request has been determined to be valid, to have been duly delivered to the secretary of the corporation and to relate to an action that may be effected by written consent pursuant to this Article SEVENTH or if no such determination shall have been made by the date required by this Article SEVENTH, and in either event no record date has been fixed by the Board of Directors, the record date shall be the first date on which a signed written consent relating to the action taken or proposed to be taken by written consent is delivered to this corporation in the manner described in paragraph 7 of this Article SEVENTH; provided that, if prior action by the Board of Directors is required under the provisions of Delaware law, the record date shall be at the close of business on the day on which the Board of Directors adopts the resolution taking such prior action.

3. Request Requirements. Any request required by paragraph 2 of this Article SEVENTH (a) must include documentary evidence of Ownership of the Requisite Percentage as of the date of such written request to the secretary of the corporation; provided, however, that if the Record Stockholders making the request are not the beneficial owners of the shares representing the Requisite Percentage, then to be valid, the request must also include documentary evidence (or, if not simultaneously provided with the request, such documentary evidence must be delivered to the secretary of the corporation within ten (10) days after the date on which the request is delivered to the secretary of the corporation) that the beneficial owners on whose behalf the request is made beneficially Own the Requisite Percentage as of the date on which such request is delivered to the secretary of the corporation, (b) must contain an agreement to solicit consents in accordance with this Article SEVENTH, (c) must provide a statement of the specific purpose or purposes of the proposal to be taken by written consent of stockholders, the matters proposed to be acted on the written consent of the stockholders and the reasons for conducting such business through a written consent of stockholders and any material interest in such business of each proposing Record Stockholder, and (d) must contain (i) such information and representations required by Section 2.5 of this corporation’s bylaws as though such requesting Record Stockholders are intending to nominate a candidate for director or propose other business to be brought before an annual meeting of stockholders, as applicable, and (ii) the text of the proposed action to be taken (including the text of any resolutions proposed to be adopted by written consent of stockholders and the language of any proposed amendment to the bylaws of this corporation). The corporation may require the Record Stockholders submitting such request to furnish such other information as may be requested by the corporation to determine whether the request relates to an action that may be effected by written consent under paragraph 4 of this Article SEVENTH. In connection with an action or actions proposed to be taken by written consent in accordance with this Article SEVENTH, the Record Stockholders seeking such action or actions shall further update andsupplement the information previously provided to the corporation in connection therewith, if necessary, as required by Section 2.5 of the corporation’s bylaws. Any Record Stockholder delivering a request required by paragraph 2 of this Article SEVENTH may revoke his, her or its request at any time by written revocation delivered by certified mail to the secretary of the corporation at the corporation’s principal executive offices. Any disposition by a Record Stockholder delivering a request required by paragraph 2 of this Article SEVENTH of any shares of common stock of the corporation (or of beneficial ownership of such shares by the beneficial owner on whose behalf the request was made) after the date of such request shall be deemed a revocation of the request with respect to such shares, and each such Record Stockholder and the applicable beneficial ownershall certify to the secretary of the corporation on the day prior to the record date set for the action by written consent as to

B-2    2020 Proxy Statement


APPENDIX B

whether any such disposition has occurred. If the unrevoked requests represent in the aggregate less than the Requisite Percentage, the Board of Directors, in its discretion, may cancel the action by written consent.

4. Actions Which May Be Taken by Written Consent. Stockholders are not entitled to act by written consent if in the good faith determination of the Board of Directors (a) the request for a record date for such action does not comply with this Article SEVENTH or the bylaws of the corporation, (b) the action relates to an item of business that is not a proper subject for stockholder action under applicable law, (c) the request for a record date for such action is received by the secretary of corporation during the period commencing ninety (90) days prior to the first anniversary of the date of the immediately preceding annual meeting and ending on the date of the final adjournment of the next annual meeting of stockholders, (d) an identical or substantially similar item of business, as determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the corporation in its sole and absolute discretion, which determination shall be conclusive and binding on the corporation and its stockholders (a “Similar Item”), was presented at a meeting of stockholders held not more than ninety (90) days before the request for a record date for such action is received by the secretary of the corporation, (e) a Similar Item is included in the corporation’s notice of meeting as an item of business to be brought before an annual or special stockholders meeting that has been called but not yet held or that is called to be held within ninety (90) days after the request for a record date for such action is received by the secretary of the corporation, or (f) the request for a record date for such action was made in a manner that involved a violation of Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or other applicable law. For purposes of this paragraph 4 of Article SEVENTH, the nomination, election or removal of directors shall be deemed to be a Similar Item with respect to all actions involving the nomination, election or removal of directors, changing the size of the board of directors and filling of vacancies and/or newly created directorships resulting from any increase in the authorized number of directors.

5. Manner of Consent Solicitation. Stockholders may take action by written consent only if consents are solicited by the stockholder or group of stockholders seeking to take action by written consent of stockholders from all Record Stockholders of capital stock of this corporation entitled to vote on the matter and in accordance with applicable law.

6. Date of Consent. Every written consent purporting to take or authorize the taking of corporate action (each such written consent is referred to in this paragraph and in paragraph 7as a “Consent”) must bear the date of signature of each Record Stockholder who signs the Consent, and no Consent shall be effective to take the corporate action referred to therein unless, within 60 days of the earliest dated Consent delivered in the manner required by paragraph 7 of this Article SEVENTH and not later than 120 days after the record date, consents signed by a sufficient number of Record Stockholders to take such action are so delivered to this corporation.

7. Delivery of Consents. No Consents may be dated or delivered to this corporation or its registered office in the State of Delaware until 60 days after the corporation has received a valid request to set a record date. Consents must be delivered to this corporation by delivery to its registered office in the State of Delaware or its principal executive offices. Delivery must be made by hand or by certified or registered mail, return receipt requested. In the event of the delivery to this corporation of Consents, the secretary of this corporation, or such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate, shall provide for the safe-keeping of such Consents and any related revocations and shall promptly conduct such ministerial review of the sufficiency of all Consents and any related revocations and of the validity of the action to be taken by written consent as the secretary of this corporation, or such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate, as the case may be, deems necessary or appropriate, including, without limitation, whether the Record Stockholders of a number of shares having the requisite voting power to authorize or take the action specified in Consents have given consent; provided, however, that if the action to which the Consents relate is the election or removal of one or more members of the Board of Directors, the secretary of this corporation, or such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate, as the case may be, shall promptly designate two persons, who shall not be members of the Board of Directors, to serve as inspectors (“Inspectors”) with respect to such Consent, and such Inspectors shall discharge the functions of the secretary of this corporation, or such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate, as the case may be, under this Article SEVENTH. If after such investigation the secretary of this corporation, such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate or the Inspectors, as the case may be, shall determine that the action purported to have been taken is duly authorized by the Consents, that fact shall be certified on the records of this corporation kept for the purpose of recording the proceedings of meetings of stockholders and the Consents shall be filed in such records. In conducting the investigation required by this section, the secretary of this corporation, such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate or the Inspectors, as the case may be, may, at the expense of this corporation, retain special legal counsel and any other necessary or appropriate professional advisors as such person or persons may deem necessary or appropriate and, to the fullest extent permitted by law, shall be fully protected in relying in good faith upon the opinion of such counsel or advisors.

8. Effectiveness of Consent. If the Board of Directors shall determine that any request to fix a record date or to take stockholder action by written consent was not properly made in accordance with, or relates to an action that may not be effected by writtenconsent pursuant to, this Article SEVENTH, or the Record Stockholder or Record Stockholders seeking to take such action do

Applied Materials, Inc.    B-3


not otherwise comply with this Article SEVENTH, then the Board of Directors shall not be required to fix a record date and any such purported action by written consent shallbe null and void to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. No action bywritten consent without a meeting shall be effective until such date as the secretary of this corporation, such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate, or the Inspectors, as applicable, certify to this corporation that the Consents delivered to this corporation in accordance with paragraph 7 of this Article SEVENTH, represent at least the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to take the corporate action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present and voted, in accordance with Delaware law and this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.

9. Challenge to Validity of Consent. Nothing contained in this Article SEVENTH shall in any way be construed to suggest or imply that the Board of Directors of this corporation or any stockholder shall not be entitled to contest the validity of any Consent or related revocations, whether before or after such certification by the secretary of this corporation, such other officer of this corporation as the Board of Directors may designate or the Inspectors, as the case may be, or to take any other action (including, without limitation, the commencement, prosecution or defense of any litigation with respect thereto, and the seeking of injunctive relief in such litigation).

10. Board-solicited Stockholder Action by Written Consent. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary set forth above, (x) none of the foregoing provisions of this Article SEVENTH shall apply to any solicitation of stockholder action by written consent by or at the direction of the Board of Directors and (y) the Board of Directors shall be entitled to solicit stockholder action by written consent in accordance with applicable law.

EIGHTH: Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the bylaws of the corporation shall so provide.

NINTH: A director of the corporation shall not be personally liable to the corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

TENTH: 1. Each person who was or is made a party or is threatened to be made a party to or is involved in any action, suit or proceeding, whether civil, criminal, administrative or investigative (hereinafter a “proceeding”), by reason of the fact that he or she, or a person of whom he or she is the legal representative, is or was a director, officer, employee or agent, of the corporation or is or was serving at the request of the corporation as a director, officer, employee or agent of another corporation or of a partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise, including service with respect to employee benefit plans, whether the basis of such proceeding is alleged action in an official capacity as a director, officer, employee or agent or in any other capacity while serving as a director, officer, employee or agent, shall be indemnified and held harmless by the corporation to the fullest extent authorized by the Delaware General Corporation Law, against all expense, liability and loss (including attorneys’ fees, judgments, fines, ERISA excise taxes or penalties and amounts paid or to be paid in settlement) reasonably incurred or suffered by such person in connection therewith and such indemnification shall continue as to a person who has ceased to be a director, officer, employee or agent and shall inure to the benefit of his or her heirs, executors and administrators; provided, however, that, except as provided in paragraph 2 hereof, the corporation shall indemnify any such person seeking indemnification in connection with a proceeding (or part thereof) initiated by such person only if such proceeding (or part thereof) was authorized by the Board of Directors of the corporation. The right to indemnification conferred in this Article shall be a contract right.

2. If a claim under paragraph 1 of this Article is not paid in full by the corporation within 30 days after a written claim has been received by the corporation, the claimant may at any time thereafter bring suit against the corporation to recover the unpaid amount of the claim and, if successful in whole or in part, the claimant shall be entitled to be paid also the expense of prosecuting such claim. It shall be a defense to any such action (other than an action brought to enforce a claim for expenses incurred in defending any proceeding in advance of its final disposition where the required undertaking, if any is required, has been tendered to the corporation) that the claimant has not met the standards of conduct which make it permissible under the Delaware General Corporation Law for the corporation to indemnify the claimant for the amount claimed.

3. The right to indemnification conferred in this Article shall not be exclusive of any other right which any person may have or hereafter acquire under any statute, provision of theAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, bylaw, agreement, vote of stockholders or disinterested directors or otherwise.

4. The corporation may maintain insurance, at its expense, to protect itself and any director, officer, employee or agent of the corporation or another corporation, partnership, joint venture, trust or other enterprise against any such expense, liability or loss, whether or not the corporation would have the power to indemnify such person against such expense, liability or loss under the Delaware General Corporation Law.

ELEVENTH: The corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in thisAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by statute, and all rights conferred on

B-4    2020 Proxy Statement


APPENDIX B

stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the provisions set forth in thisAmended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, including this Article ELEVENTH, may not be amended or repealed in any respect unless such amendment or repeal is approved by the affirmative vote of not less than a majority of the total voting power of all outstanding shares of stock in this corporation entitled to vote thereon.

THE UNDERSIGNED, being the incorporator hereinbefore named, for the purpose of forming a corporation to do business both within and without the State of Delaware, and in pursuance of the Delaware Corporation Law, does hereby make and file this Certificate.

/s/ Donald A. Slichter

Donald. A. Slichter

IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of Applied Materials, Inc. has been executed by its duly authorized officer this [    ] day of [                ], 20[    ].

Applied Materials, Inc.A-2
By:    2022 Proxy Statement  
Name:
Title

Applied Materials, Inc.    B-5


LOGO


LOGO DIRECTIONS TO APPLIED MATERIALS BOWERS CAMPUS3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054 DIRECTIONS FROM HIGHWAY 101 Exit onto Bowers Avenue / Great America Parkway Proceed to Bowers Avenue Cross Scott Boulevard Applied Materials Bowers Campus is on your right Turn RIGHT into the 2nd driveway between Buildings 1 and 2 Proceed between Buildings 1 and 2 to the covered parking lot The entrance to Building 1 is located to the left of the parking lot DIRECTIONS FROM INTERSTATE 280 Exit onto Lawrence Expressway / Stevens Creek BoulevardProceed to Lawrence Expressway North. Continue for approximately 4 milesTurn RIGHT onto Arques Avenue Proceed on Arques Avenue, which becomes Scott Boulevard Turn RIGHT onto Bowers Aveune Applied Materials Bowers Campus is on your right Turn RIGHT into the 2nd driveway between Buildings 1 and 2Proceed between Buildings 1 and 2 to the covered parking lot The entrance to Building 1 is located to the left of the parking lot


LOGOLOGO

3225 OAKMEAD VILLAGE DRIVE P.O. BOX 58039, M/S 1241 SANTA CLARA, CA 95054 YOU CAN VOTE OVER THE INTERNET OR BY TELEPHONE QUICK · EASY · CONVENIENT AVAILABLE 24 HOURS A DAY · 7 DAYS A WEEK APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. encourages you to take advantage of convenient ways to vote. If voting by proxy, you may vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail. Your Internet or telephone vote authorizes the named proxies to vote in the same manner as if you marked, signed, and returned your proxy card. To vote over the Internet, by telephone or by mail, please read the 20202022 Proxy Statement and then follow these easy steps: VOTE BY INTERNET Before The Meeting - Go to www.proxyvote.com or scan the QR Barcode above Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on March 11, 2020.9, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form. During The Meeting - Go to www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022 You may attend the meeting via the Internet and vote during the meeting. Have the information that is printed below in the box marked by the arrow available and follow the instructions. ELECTRONIC DELIVERY OF FUTURE PROXY MATERIALS If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by Applied Materials, Inc. in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically over the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in the future. VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903 Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 11:59 P.M. Eastern Time on March 11, 2020.9, 2022. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions. VOTE BY MAIL Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to APPLIED MATERIALS, INC., c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717. TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS: E88857-Z76235D65637-P65858 KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED. DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR all of the nominees listed below and FOR management proposals 2 3 and 4:3: 1. Election of Directors Nominees: Abstain Against For Against Abstain Nominees: 1a. Rani Borkar 1b. Judy Bruner 1b.1c. Xun (Eric) Chen 1c.1d. Aart J. de Geus 1d.1e. Gary E. Dickerson 1e. Stephen R. Forrest 1f. Thomas J. Iannotti 1g. Alexander A. Karsner 1h. Adrianna C. Ma 1i. Yvonne McGill 1j. Scott A. McGregor Please indicate if you plan to attend this meeting. Yes NoAgainst For Against Abstain 2. Approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of Applied Materials’ named executive officers for fiscal year 2019.2021. 3. Ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as Applied Materials’ independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 2020.2022. The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST shareholder proposals 4 and 5: Abstain Against For 4. ApprovalShareholder proposal to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of an amendmenta combined 10% of our outstanding common stock the power to call a special shareholder meeting. 5. Shareholder proposal to improve the executive compensation program and restatement of Applied Materials’ Certificate of Incorporationpolicy, such as to allow shareholders to act by written consent.include the CEO pay ratio factor and voices from employees. NOTE: The proposals to be voted on may also include such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Please sign exactly as your name appears herein. When shares are held by joint tenants, both should sign. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, trustee or guardian, please give full title as such. If a corporation, please sign in full corporate name by president or other authorized officer. If a partnership, please sign in partnership name by authorized person. Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX] Date Signature (Joint Owners) Date


LOGOLOGO

Important notice regarding the availability of proxy materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on March 12, 2020:10, 2022: The Proxy Statement and Annual Report to Shareholders are available at www.proxyvote.com. E88858-Z76235atwww.proxyvote.com. D65638-P65858 APPLIED MATERIALS, INC. PROXY FOR ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS ON MARCH 12, 202010, 2022 THIS PROXY IS SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS The undersigned hereby appoints Gary E. Dickerson Daniel J. Durn and Christina Y. Lai,Teri A. Little, or anyeither of them, each with full power of substitution, as proxies of the undersigned, to attend the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Applied Materials, Inc. to be held virtually at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/AMAT2022 on Thursday, March 12, 202010, 2022 at 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time, at Applied Materials, Inc.’s corporate offices at 3050 Bowers Avenue, Building 1, Santa Clara, California 95054, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, and to vote the number of shares the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present on the items set forth on the reverse side and, in their discretion, upon such other business that may properly come before such meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED AS SPECIFIED, OR IF NO CHOICE IS SPECIFIED, WILL BE VOTED FOR EACH OF THE TEN NOMINEES FOR ELECTION AS DIRECTORS (PROPOSAL 1), FOR THE APPROVAL, ON AN ADVISORY BASIS, OF THE COMPENSATION OF OUR NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICERS FOR FISCAL YEAR 20192021 (PROPOSAL 2), FOR THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF KPMG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR FISCAL YEAR 20202022 (PROPOSAL 3) AND FOR, AGAINST THE APPROVALSHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO AMEND THE APPROPRIATE COMPANY GOVERNING DOCUMENTS TO GIVE THE OWNERS OF AN AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENTA COMBINED 10% OF OUR CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATIONOUTSTANDING COMMON STOCK THE POWER TO ALLOW SHAREHOLDERSCALL A SPECIAL SHAREHOLDER MEETING (PROPOSAL 4), AND AGAINST THE SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL TO ACT BY WRITTEN CONSENTIMPROVE THE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROGRAM AND POLICY, SUCH AS TO INCLUDE THE CEO PAY RATIO FACTOR AND VOICES FROM EMPLOYEES (PROPOSAL 4)5). Dear Shareholder: On the reverse side of this card are instructions on how to vote over the Internet or by telephone for the election of directors (Proposal 1), for the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers for fiscal year 20192021 (Proposal 2), for the ratification of the appointment of KPMG LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for fiscal year 20202022 (Proposal 3) and for, against the approvalshareholder proposal to amend the appropriate company governing documents to give the owners of an amendment and restatementa combined 10% of our Certificate of Incorporationoutstanding common stock the power to allow shareholderscall a special shareholder meeting (Proposal 4), and against the shareholder proposal to act by written consentimprove the executive compensation program and policy, such as to include the CEO pay ratio factor and voices from employees (Proposal 4)5). Please consider voting over the Internet or by telephone. Your vote is recorded as if you mailed in your proxy card. We believe voting this way is convenient. Thank you for your attention to these matters. Applied Materials, Inc. PLEASE SIGN, DATE AND MAIL THIS PROXY CARD PROMPTLY USING THE ENCLOSED POSTAGE-PAID ENVELOPE. If you vote over the Internet or by telephone, you do not need to return the proxy card. THANK YOU FOR VOTING! (Continued and to be signed on the reverse side)